Standard

Genome-Wide Association Studies in Suicidology : A Review of Recent Achievements. / Rozanov, V. A.; Mazo, G. E.; Kulemin, N. A.

In: Russian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 56, No. 7, 01.07.2020, p. 769-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Rozanov, V. A. ; Mazo, G. E. ; Kulemin, N. A. / Genome-Wide Association Studies in Suicidology : A Review of Recent Achievements. In: Russian Journal of Genetics. 2020 ; Vol. 56, No. 7. pp. 769-785.

BibTeX

@article{2dc7a6f5fe36426b9e94624d2be26c5e,
title = "Genome-Wide Association Studies in Suicidology: A Review of Recent Achievements",
abstract = "Abstract: Modern biological models based on stress-diathesis consider suicide an independent form of behavior, which is the basis for the search for specific genetic markers. The current review embraces all presently existing GWAS studies of suicidal phenotypes (suicidal ideation, attempts, and completed suicides). Fifteen studies based on this strategy and using different approaches to data analysis, including comparisons with existing databases on psychiatric genetics, pathway analysis, protein-protein interactions, functional grouping of genes, and enrichment analysis are discussed. In contrast to the candidate gene studies which intensively discussed associations with neurotransmitter systems of the brain (indol- and catecholamines, GABA, excitatory aminoacids, etc.), GWAS suggest a rather different set of factors. Many findings are among the genes involved in neurodevelopment, neuroplasticity, cell adhesion and migration, proliferation, and intracellular signaling, as well as immune system functioning. We consider that this confirms the relevance of the stress-vulnerability models implying a key role of the early development, which affects neuroplasticity. Stress as a systemic reaction of the organism demonstrates a significant role in the genesis of suicidal behavior. It should be noted that findings of different studies rarely coincide, thus demonstrating heterogeneous findings. This may be due to differences in bioinformatics approaches, description of phenotypes, and design of the study. Future accumulation of data especially considering the ethnic factor, increase in the sample size, and meta-analyses may clarify the polygenic nature of suicidal behavior and identify genetic markers that are valuable for both understanding the pathogenesis of suicidality and suicide prediction and prevention.",
keywords = "GWAS, neurodevelopmental genеs, neuroplasticity, polygenic risk assessment, stress vulnerability, suicidal behavior, suicide, GENETIC-BASIS, ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT, RISK, CHILDREN, neurodevelopmental genes, MENTAL-DISORDERS, PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS, SUICIDAL-BEHAVIOR, NEUROBIOLOGY, IDEATION, LINKAGE",
author = "Rozanov, {V. A.} and Mazo, {G. E.} and Kulemin, {N. A.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Pleiades Publishing, Inc. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1134/S1022795420070121",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "769--785",
journal = "Russian Journal of Genetics",
issn = "1022-7954",
publisher = "МАИК {"}Наука/Интерпериодика{"}",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genome-Wide Association Studies in Suicidology

T2 - A Review of Recent Achievements

AU - Rozanov, V. A.

AU - Mazo, G. E.

AU - Kulemin, N. A.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Pleiades Publishing, Inc. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/7/1

Y1 - 2020/7/1

N2 - Abstract: Modern biological models based on stress-diathesis consider suicide an independent form of behavior, which is the basis for the search for specific genetic markers. The current review embraces all presently existing GWAS studies of suicidal phenotypes (suicidal ideation, attempts, and completed suicides). Fifteen studies based on this strategy and using different approaches to data analysis, including comparisons with existing databases on psychiatric genetics, pathway analysis, protein-protein interactions, functional grouping of genes, and enrichment analysis are discussed. In contrast to the candidate gene studies which intensively discussed associations with neurotransmitter systems of the brain (indol- and catecholamines, GABA, excitatory aminoacids, etc.), GWAS suggest a rather different set of factors. Many findings are among the genes involved in neurodevelopment, neuroplasticity, cell adhesion and migration, proliferation, and intracellular signaling, as well as immune system functioning. We consider that this confirms the relevance of the stress-vulnerability models implying a key role of the early development, which affects neuroplasticity. Stress as a systemic reaction of the organism demonstrates a significant role in the genesis of suicidal behavior. It should be noted that findings of different studies rarely coincide, thus demonstrating heterogeneous findings. This may be due to differences in bioinformatics approaches, description of phenotypes, and design of the study. Future accumulation of data especially considering the ethnic factor, increase in the sample size, and meta-analyses may clarify the polygenic nature of suicidal behavior and identify genetic markers that are valuable for both understanding the pathogenesis of suicidality and suicide prediction and prevention.

AB - Abstract: Modern biological models based on stress-diathesis consider suicide an independent form of behavior, which is the basis for the search for specific genetic markers. The current review embraces all presently existing GWAS studies of suicidal phenotypes (suicidal ideation, attempts, and completed suicides). Fifteen studies based on this strategy and using different approaches to data analysis, including comparisons with existing databases on psychiatric genetics, pathway analysis, protein-protein interactions, functional grouping of genes, and enrichment analysis are discussed. In contrast to the candidate gene studies which intensively discussed associations with neurotransmitter systems of the brain (indol- and catecholamines, GABA, excitatory aminoacids, etc.), GWAS suggest a rather different set of factors. Many findings are among the genes involved in neurodevelopment, neuroplasticity, cell adhesion and migration, proliferation, and intracellular signaling, as well as immune system functioning. We consider that this confirms the relevance of the stress-vulnerability models implying a key role of the early development, which affects neuroplasticity. Stress as a systemic reaction of the organism demonstrates a significant role in the genesis of suicidal behavior. It should be noted that findings of different studies rarely coincide, thus demonstrating heterogeneous findings. This may be due to differences in bioinformatics approaches, description of phenotypes, and design of the study. Future accumulation of data especially considering the ethnic factor, increase in the sample size, and meta-analyses may clarify the polygenic nature of suicidal behavior and identify genetic markers that are valuable for both understanding the pathogenesis of suicidality and suicide prediction and prevention.

KW - GWAS

KW - neurodevelopmental genеs

KW - neuroplasticity

KW - polygenic risk assessment

KW - stress vulnerability

KW - suicidal behavior

KW - suicide

KW - GENETIC-BASIS

KW - ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT

KW - RISK

KW - CHILDREN

KW - neurodevelopmental genes

KW - MENTAL-DISORDERS

KW - PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS

KW - SUICIDAL-BEHAVIOR

KW - NEUROBIOLOGY

KW - IDEATION

KW - LINKAGE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088568797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1134/S1022795420070121

DO - 10.1134/S1022795420070121

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85088568797

VL - 56

SP - 769

EP - 785

JO - Russian Journal of Genetics

JF - Russian Journal of Genetics

SN - 1022-7954

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 71977727