The effectiveness of the discrimination of segment sizes by people with different cognitive style parameters - field dependence vs. field independence, analytical vs. synthetic, and flexible vs. rigid cognitive control - was studied. Discrimination effectiveness was assessed in terms of the magnitude of the Ponzo illusion. The magnitude of the Ponzo illusion was found to be significantly smaller in subjects with a field-independent cognitive style than in those with a field-dependent style. People with the flexible type of cognitive control demonstrated a tendency to more accurate perception of segment size in the Ponzo figure than those with rigid control. There was no relationship between the analytical-synthetic style of categorization and the magnitude of the Ponzo illusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)748-753
Number of pages6
JournalNeuroscience and Behavioral Physiology
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014

    Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

    Research areas

  • analytical vs. synthetic, field independence vs. field dependence, flexible vs. rigid cognitive control, local vs. global image analysis, Ponzo illusion, segment size

ID: 51465521