Standard

Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections. / Emeline, A. V.; Ryabchuk, V. K.; Serpone, N.

In: Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Vol. 109, No. 39, 06.10.2005, p. 18515-18521.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Emeline, AV, Ryabchuk, VK & Serpone, N 2005, 'Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections', Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 39, pp. 18515-18521. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0523367

APA

Emeline, A. V., Ryabchuk, V. K., & Serpone, N. (2005). Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(39), 18515-18521. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0523367

Vancouver

Emeline AV, Ryabchuk VK, Serpone N. Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2005 Oct 6;109(39):18515-18521. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0523367

Author

Emeline, A. V. ; Ryabchuk, V. K. ; Serpone, N. / Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections. In: Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2005 ; Vol. 109, No. 39. pp. 18515-18521.

BibTeX

@article{bf1dd666699b45c683a9a8a21e580a5f,
title = "Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections",
abstract = "In a recent article, Ollis1 analyzed heretofore reported photocatalyst kinetics of surface photochemical reactions that take place in heterogeneous systems and that rely heavily on the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH) kinetic model to interpret the experimental observations. This model assumes a fast adsorption/desorption equilibrium step and a subsequent slow surface step. His interesting analysis of the experimental results reported in 2000 by Emeline and co-workers,2 Xu and Langford,3 and Martyanov and Savinov4 prompted our reexamination of the LH kinetic model along with several other dogmas that continue to propagate in the heterogeneous photocatalytic landscape. This short article discusses some of these issues and reexamines certain misinterpretations. Specifically, we reexamine (1) the a priori assumed validity of the LH kinetic model in heterogeneous photocatalysis, (2) the recombination of photogenerated free charge carriers on the solid (metal oxide) photocatalyst by the band-to-band recombination pathway, and (3) the mistaken assertion1 that the kinetics of a heterogeneous photoreaction are either only first-order dependent or half-order dependent on photon flow (i.e., light irradiance).",
author = "Emeline, {A. V.} and Ryabchuk, {V. K.} and N. Serpone",
year = "2005",
month = oct,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1021/jp0523367",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "18515--18521",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry B",
issn = "1520-6106",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "39",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dogmas and misconceptions in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Some enlightened reflections

AU - Emeline, A. V.

AU - Ryabchuk, V. K.

AU - Serpone, N.

PY - 2005/10/6

Y1 - 2005/10/6

N2 - In a recent article, Ollis1 analyzed heretofore reported photocatalyst kinetics of surface photochemical reactions that take place in heterogeneous systems and that rely heavily on the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH) kinetic model to interpret the experimental observations. This model assumes a fast adsorption/desorption equilibrium step and a subsequent slow surface step. His interesting analysis of the experimental results reported in 2000 by Emeline and co-workers,2 Xu and Langford,3 and Martyanov and Savinov4 prompted our reexamination of the LH kinetic model along with several other dogmas that continue to propagate in the heterogeneous photocatalytic landscape. This short article discusses some of these issues and reexamines certain misinterpretations. Specifically, we reexamine (1) the a priori assumed validity of the LH kinetic model in heterogeneous photocatalysis, (2) the recombination of photogenerated free charge carriers on the solid (metal oxide) photocatalyst by the band-to-band recombination pathway, and (3) the mistaken assertion1 that the kinetics of a heterogeneous photoreaction are either only first-order dependent or half-order dependent on photon flow (i.e., light irradiance).

AB - In a recent article, Ollis1 analyzed heretofore reported photocatalyst kinetics of surface photochemical reactions that take place in heterogeneous systems and that rely heavily on the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH) kinetic model to interpret the experimental observations. This model assumes a fast adsorption/desorption equilibrium step and a subsequent slow surface step. His interesting analysis of the experimental results reported in 2000 by Emeline and co-workers,2 Xu and Langford,3 and Martyanov and Savinov4 prompted our reexamination of the LH kinetic model along with several other dogmas that continue to propagate in the heterogeneous photocatalytic landscape. This short article discusses some of these issues and reexamines certain misinterpretations. Specifically, we reexamine (1) the a priori assumed validity of the LH kinetic model in heterogeneous photocatalysis, (2) the recombination of photogenerated free charge carriers on the solid (metal oxide) photocatalyst by the band-to-band recombination pathway, and (3) the mistaken assertion1 that the kinetics of a heterogeneous photoreaction are either only first-order dependent or half-order dependent on photon flow (i.e., light irradiance).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26844563677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/jp0523367

DO - 10.1021/jp0523367

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:26844563677

VL - 109

SP - 18515

EP - 18521

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B

SN - 1520-6106

IS - 39

ER -

ID: 35141402