Standard

Does chemometrics work for matrix effects correction in X-ray fluorescence analysis? / Aidene, Soraya ; Khaydukova, Maria ; Pashkova, Galina; Chubarov, Victor ; Savinov, Sergey ; Semenov, Valentin; Kirsanov, Dmitry; Panchuk, Vitaly.

In: SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, Vol. 185, 106310, 11.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{f88c2be0dbfb46bbb38502a3b9d5a66a,
title = "Does chemometrics work for matrix effects correction in X-ray fluorescence analysis?",
abstract = "Matrix effects are the main problem of quantitative analysis using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). A largenumber of methods (fundamental parameters, intensity correction, etc.) have been proposed to account for sucheffects in order to increase the accuracy of determining the content of target analytes. Application of chemometricalgorithms for data processing of XRF spectra has been actively developed in recent years. The possibilitiesof these methods have not been systematically studied in terms of the correction of matrix effects yet. Thepresent study is intended to fill this gap. The article compares the capabilities of the most popular chemometricapproaches and classical methods of XRF data processing using as an example quantitative determination of anumber of elements in ore and steel samples performed with energy-dispersive XRF.",
keywords = "Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence, Matrix effect correction, Multivariate regression, Chemometric, Intensity correction, Chemometrics, SULFUR, MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION, SPECTROMETRY, TXRF",
author = "Soraya Aidene and Maria Khaydukova and Galina Pashkova and Victor Chubarov and Sergey Savinov and Valentin Semenov and Dmitry Kirsanov and Vitaly Panchuk",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.sab.2021.106310",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
journal = "SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY",
issn = "0584-8547",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does chemometrics work for matrix effects correction in X-ray fluorescence analysis?

AU - Aidene, Soraya

AU - Khaydukova, Maria

AU - Pashkova, Galina

AU - Chubarov, Victor

AU - Savinov, Sergey

AU - Semenov, Valentin

AU - Kirsanov, Dmitry

AU - Panchuk, Vitaly

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - Matrix effects are the main problem of quantitative analysis using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). A largenumber of methods (fundamental parameters, intensity correction, etc.) have been proposed to account for sucheffects in order to increase the accuracy of determining the content of target analytes. Application of chemometricalgorithms for data processing of XRF spectra has been actively developed in recent years. The possibilitiesof these methods have not been systematically studied in terms of the correction of matrix effects yet. Thepresent study is intended to fill this gap. The article compares the capabilities of the most popular chemometricapproaches and classical methods of XRF data processing using as an example quantitative determination of anumber of elements in ore and steel samples performed with energy-dispersive XRF.

AB - Matrix effects are the main problem of quantitative analysis using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). A largenumber of methods (fundamental parameters, intensity correction, etc.) have been proposed to account for sucheffects in order to increase the accuracy of determining the content of target analytes. Application of chemometricalgorithms for data processing of XRF spectra has been actively developed in recent years. The possibilitiesof these methods have not been systematically studied in terms of the correction of matrix effects yet. Thepresent study is intended to fill this gap. The article compares the capabilities of the most popular chemometricapproaches and classical methods of XRF data processing using as an example quantitative determination of anumber of elements in ore and steel samples performed with energy-dispersive XRF.

KW - Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence

KW - Matrix effect correction

KW - Multivariate regression

KW - Chemometric

KW - Intensity correction

KW - Chemometrics

KW - SULFUR

KW - MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION

KW - SPECTROMETRY

KW - TXRF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118702831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0ac8ce5b-36d4-3616-a32a-c5933f57868a/

U2 - 10.1016/j.sab.2021.106310

DO - 10.1016/j.sab.2021.106310

M3 - Article

VL - 185

JO - SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY

JF - SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY

SN - 0584-8547

M1 - 106310

ER -

ID: 88218294