Standard

Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action. / Ogleznev, Vitaly.

In: Schole, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2016, p. 471-482.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Harvard

Ogleznev, V 2016, 'Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action', Schole, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 471-482.

APA

Ogleznev, V. (2016). Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action. Schole, 10(2), 471-482.

Vancouver

Ogleznev V. Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action. Schole. 2016;10(2):471-482.

Author

Ogleznev, Vitaly. / Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action. In: Schole. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 471-482.

BibTeX

@article{6ab2b246e1014852b7e513fa7b5f74dd,
title = "Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action",
abstract = "This essay is concerned with different approaches to the elucidation of action. It explicates the influence of Aristotle's theory of action on the development of the modern philosophy of action, provided, first of all, by Reductionist and Causalist's points of view. The author argues that the denial of the physical and psychological components of the action allows to conclude, firstly, that action is a social concept, logically dependent on the accepted rules of conduct; secondly, that it is fundamentally not descriptive, but ascriptive in its character; and thirdly, that it is a defeasible concept to be defined through exceptions and not by a set of necessary and sufficient conditions whether physical or psychological.",
keywords = "Action, Aristotle, Behavior, Conduct, Descriptive and ascriptive approaches, Intention, Movement, Responsibility",
author = "Vitaly Ogleznev",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "471--482",
journal = "SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ",
issn = "1995-4328",
publisher = "Издательство Новосибирского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Descriptive and Ascriptive Approaches to the Elucidation of Action

AU - Ogleznev, Vitaly

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This essay is concerned with different approaches to the elucidation of action. It explicates the influence of Aristotle's theory of action on the development of the modern philosophy of action, provided, first of all, by Reductionist and Causalist's points of view. The author argues that the denial of the physical and psychological components of the action allows to conclude, firstly, that action is a social concept, logically dependent on the accepted rules of conduct; secondly, that it is fundamentally not descriptive, but ascriptive in its character; and thirdly, that it is a defeasible concept to be defined through exceptions and not by a set of necessary and sufficient conditions whether physical or psychological.

AB - This essay is concerned with different approaches to the elucidation of action. It explicates the influence of Aristotle's theory of action on the development of the modern philosophy of action, provided, first of all, by Reductionist and Causalist's points of view. The author argues that the denial of the physical and psychological components of the action allows to conclude, firstly, that action is a social concept, logically dependent on the accepted rules of conduct; secondly, that it is fundamentally not descriptive, but ascriptive in its character; and thirdly, that it is a defeasible concept to be defined through exceptions and not by a set of necessary and sufficient conditions whether physical or psychological.

KW - Action

KW - Aristotle

KW - Behavior

KW - Conduct

KW - Descriptive and ascriptive approaches

KW - Intention

KW - Movement

KW - Responsibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978975657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84978975657

VL - 10

SP - 471

EP - 482

JO - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

JF - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

SN - 1995-4328

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 48883654