Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Descriptional complexity of input-driven pushdown automata. / Okhotin, Alexander; Piao, Xiaoxue; Salomaa, Kai.
Languages Alive: Essays Dedicated to Jurgen Dassow on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. ed. / Henning Bordihn; Martin Kutrib; Bianca Truthe. 2012. p. 186-206 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 7300 LNAI).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Descriptional complexity of input-driven pushdown automata
AU - Okhotin, Alexander
AU - Piao, Xiaoxue
AU - Salomaa, Kai
PY - 2012/10/8
Y1 - 2012/10/8
N2 - It is known that a nondeterministic input-driven pushdown automaton (IDPDA) can be determinized. Alur and Madhusudan (Adding nesting structure to words, J.ACM 56(3), 2009) showed that a deterministic IDPDA simulating a nondeterministic IDPDA with n states and stack symbols may need, in the worst case, states. In their construction, the equivalent deterministic IDPDA does, in fact, not need to use the stack. This paper considers the size blow-up of determinization in more detail, and gives a lower bound construction, that is tight within a multiplicative constant, with respect to the size of the nondeterministic automaton both for the number of states and the number of stack symbols. The paper also surveys the recent results on operational state complexity of IDPDAs, and on the cost of converting a nondeterministic automaton to an unambiguous one, and an unambiguous automaton to a deterministic one.
AB - It is known that a nondeterministic input-driven pushdown automaton (IDPDA) can be determinized. Alur and Madhusudan (Adding nesting structure to words, J.ACM 56(3), 2009) showed that a deterministic IDPDA simulating a nondeterministic IDPDA with n states and stack symbols may need, in the worst case, states. In their construction, the equivalent deterministic IDPDA does, in fact, not need to use the stack. This paper considers the size blow-up of determinization in more detail, and gives a lower bound construction, that is tight within a multiplicative constant, with respect to the size of the nondeterministic automaton both for the number of states and the number of stack symbols. The paper also surveys the recent results on operational state complexity of IDPDAs, and on the cost of converting a nondeterministic automaton to an unambiguous one, and an unambiguous automaton to a deterministic one.
KW - descriptional complexity
KW - input-driven pushdown
KW - nondeterminism
KW - state complexity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867012117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-31644-9-13
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-31644-9-13
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84867012117
SN - 9783642316432
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 186
EP - 206
BT - Languages Alive
A2 - Bordihn, Henning
A2 - Kutrib, Martin
A2 - Truthe, Bianca
ER -
ID: 41140066