Standard

Definition per genus proximum et differentiam specificam and legal language: Aristotle and analytical jurisprudence. / Ogleznev, Vitaly; Surovtsev, Valery.

In: Schole, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2018, p. 108-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{80af9b4745e24283989c6ae8963bde62,
title = "Definition per genus proximum et differentiam specificam and legal language: Aristotle and analytical jurisprudence",
abstract = "The article is concerned with the general characteristics of Aristotle's theory of a genus-differentia definition. The authors examine the validity of the definitions in the framework of legal language and present some objections against the definitions of per genus proximum et differentia specificam as they are considered by Aristotle. At the same time, through the objections to the position of genus-differentia definition critics, it is proved that in a number of cases Aristotle's theory is more preferable than the approach offered by Herbert Hart, the proponent of analytical legal philosophy. The argument of Peter Hacker is used to reinstate Aristotle's genus-differentia definitions.",
keywords = "Analytical jurisprudence, Aristotle, Definitio per genus proximum et differentiam specificam, Legal language",
author = "Vitaly Ogleznev and Valery Surovtsev",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.21267/AQUILO.2018.12.10420",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "108--121",
journal = "SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ",
issn = "1995-4328",
publisher = "Издательство Новосибирского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Definition per genus proximum et differentiam specificam and legal language: Aristotle and analytical jurisprudence

AU - Ogleznev, Vitaly

AU - Surovtsev, Valery

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The article is concerned with the general characteristics of Aristotle's theory of a genus-differentia definition. The authors examine the validity of the definitions in the framework of legal language and present some objections against the definitions of per genus proximum et differentia specificam as they are considered by Aristotle. At the same time, through the objections to the position of genus-differentia definition critics, it is proved that in a number of cases Aristotle's theory is more preferable than the approach offered by Herbert Hart, the proponent of analytical legal philosophy. The argument of Peter Hacker is used to reinstate Aristotle's genus-differentia definitions.

AB - The article is concerned with the general characteristics of Aristotle's theory of a genus-differentia definition. The authors examine the validity of the definitions in the framework of legal language and present some objections against the definitions of per genus proximum et differentia specificam as they are considered by Aristotle. At the same time, through the objections to the position of genus-differentia definition critics, it is proved that in a number of cases Aristotle's theory is more preferable than the approach offered by Herbert Hart, the proponent of analytical legal philosophy. The argument of Peter Hacker is used to reinstate Aristotle's genus-differentia definitions.

KW - Analytical jurisprudence

KW - Aristotle

KW - Definitio per genus proximum et differentiam specificam

KW - Legal language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047650166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21267/AQUILO.2018.12.10420

DO - 10.21267/AQUILO.2018.12.10420

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85047650166

VL - 12

SP - 108

EP - 121

JO - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

JF - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

SN - 1995-4328

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 48883518