Standard

DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE : JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES. / Frolov, Serge; Stetckevich, Mikhail.

In: Hebrew Studies, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2021, p. 73-93.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Frolov, S & Stetckevich, M 2021, 'DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE: JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES', Hebrew Studies, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1353/HBR.2021.0011

APA

Frolov, S., & Stetckevich, M. (2021). DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE: JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES. Hebrew Studies, 62(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1353/HBR.2021.0011

Vancouver

Frolov S, Stetckevich M. DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE: JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES. Hebrew Studies. 2021;62(1):73-93. https://doi.org/10.1353/HBR.2021.0011

Author

Frolov, Serge ; Stetckevich, Mikhail. / DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE : JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES. In: Hebrew Studies. 2021 ; Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 73-93.

BibTeX

@article{655be4e7a9ae449aaac480843abd60ab,
title = "DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE: JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES",
abstract = "Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts.",
author = "Serge Frolov and Mikhail Stetckevich",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 National Association of Professors of Hebrew. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1353/HBR.2021.0011",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "73--93",
journal = "Hebrew Studies",
issn = "0146-4094",
publisher = "National Association of Professors of Hebrew in American Institutions of Higher Learning",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE

T2 - JOANNA HOYT and REPENTANCE in JUDGES

AU - Frolov, Serge

AU - Stetckevich, Mikhail

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 National Association of Professors of Hebrew. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts.

AB - Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121703556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/HBR.2021.0011

DO - 10.1353/HBR.2021.0011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85121703556

VL - 62

SP - 73

EP - 93

JO - Hebrew Studies

JF - Hebrew Studies

SN - 0146-4094

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 91415591