Standard

Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR : Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths. / Grigorenko, Elena L.; Geiser, Christian; Slobodskaya, Helena R.; Francis, David J.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 893-911.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Grigorenko, EL, Geiser, C, Slobodskaya, HR & Francis, DJ 2010, 'Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths', Psychological Assessment, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020703

APA

Grigorenko, E. L., Geiser, C., Slobodskaya, H. R., & Francis, D. J. (2010). Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths. Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020703

Vancouver

Grigorenko EL, Geiser C, Slobodskaya HR, Francis DJ. Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths. Psychological Assessment. 2010 Dec;22(4):893-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020703

Author

Grigorenko, Elena L. ; Geiser, Christian ; Slobodskaya, Helena R. ; Francis, David J. / Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR : Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths. In: Psychological Assessment. 2010 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 893-911.

BibTeX

@article{907fec9138884d2493d6fd3371b959b3,
title = "Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths",
abstract = "A large community-based sample of Russian youths (n = 841, age M = 13.17 years, SD = 2.51) was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (mothers and fathers separately), Teacher's Report Form, and Youth Self-Report. The multiple indicator-version of the correlated trait-correlated method minus one, or CT-C(M - 1), model was applied to analyze (a) the convergent and divergent validity of these instruments in Russia, (b) the degree of trait-specificity of rater biases, and (c) potential predictors of rater-specific effects. As expected, based on the published results from different countries and in different languages, the convergent validity of the instruments was rather high between mother and father reports, but rather low for parent, teacher, and self-reports. For self- and teacher reports, rater-specific effects were related to age and gender of the children for some traits. These results, once again, attest to the importance of incorporating information from multiple observers when psychopathological traits are evaluated in children and adolescents.",
keywords = "CBCL, Correlated trait-correlated method minus one CT-C(M - 1), Russian youth, TRF, YSR",
author = "Grigorenko, {Elena L.} and Christian Geiser and Slobodskaya, {Helena R.} and Francis, {David J.}",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1037/a0020703",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "893--911",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR

T2 - Trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths

AU - Grigorenko, Elena L.

AU - Geiser, Christian

AU - Slobodskaya, Helena R.

AU - Francis, David J.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - A large community-based sample of Russian youths (n = 841, age M = 13.17 years, SD = 2.51) was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (mothers and fathers separately), Teacher's Report Form, and Youth Self-Report. The multiple indicator-version of the correlated trait-correlated method minus one, or CT-C(M - 1), model was applied to analyze (a) the convergent and divergent validity of these instruments in Russia, (b) the degree of trait-specificity of rater biases, and (c) potential predictors of rater-specific effects. As expected, based on the published results from different countries and in different languages, the convergent validity of the instruments was rather high between mother and father reports, but rather low for parent, teacher, and self-reports. For self- and teacher reports, rater-specific effects were related to age and gender of the children for some traits. These results, once again, attest to the importance of incorporating information from multiple observers when psychopathological traits are evaluated in children and adolescents.

AB - A large community-based sample of Russian youths (n = 841, age M = 13.17 years, SD = 2.51) was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (mothers and fathers separately), Teacher's Report Form, and Youth Self-Report. The multiple indicator-version of the correlated trait-correlated method minus one, or CT-C(M - 1), model was applied to analyze (a) the convergent and divergent validity of these instruments in Russia, (b) the degree of trait-specificity of rater biases, and (c) potential predictors of rater-specific effects. As expected, based on the published results from different countries and in different languages, the convergent validity of the instruments was rather high between mother and father reports, but rather low for parent, teacher, and self-reports. For self- and teacher reports, rater-specific effects were related to age and gender of the children for some traits. These results, once again, attest to the importance of incorporating information from multiple observers when psychopathological traits are evaluated in children and adolescents.

KW - CBCL

KW - Correlated trait-correlated method minus one CT-C(M - 1)

KW - Russian youth

KW - TRF

KW - YSR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650122708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0020703

DO - 10.1037/a0020703

M3 - Article

C2 - 21133549

AN - SCOPUS:78650122708

VL - 22

SP - 893

EP - 911

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 87396498