Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Correction : Methane release from carbonate rock formations in the Siberian permafrost area during and after the 2020 heat wave (Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2021) 118 (e2107632118) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107632118). / Froitzheim, Nikolaus; Majka, Jaroslaw; Zastrozhnov, Dmitry.
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 118, No. 41, e2115789118, 04.10.2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Methane release from carbonate rock formations in the Siberian permafrost area during and after the 2020 heat wave (Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2021) 118 (e2107632118) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107632118)
AU - Froitzheim, Nikolaus
AU - Majka, Jaroslaw
AU - Zastrozhnov, Dmitry
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10/4
Y1 - 2021/10/4
N2 - The authors note that they included monthly atmospheric methane concentrations maps, starting in May 2020 and terminating in May 2021. However, the satellite devices measuring concentrations of atmospheric methane do not operate at such high latitudes during the winter months. The maps for the period November 2020–February 2021, presented on Fig. 1, repeat the signal from October 2021. Thus they should not be taken into consideration. The authors thank Ilse Aben (Netherlands Institute for Space Research) and Benjamin Poulter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) for pointing out this issue. This does not affect the results or conclusions of the article. The corrected Fig. 1 and its legend appear below. The online version has been corrected. (Figure Presented).
AB - The authors note that they included monthly atmospheric methane concentrations maps, starting in May 2020 and terminating in May 2021. However, the satellite devices measuring concentrations of atmospheric methane do not operate at such high latitudes during the winter months. The maps for the period November 2020–February 2021, presented on Fig. 1, repeat the signal from October 2021. Thus they should not be taken into consideration. The authors thank Ilse Aben (Netherlands Institute for Space Research) and Benjamin Poulter (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) for pointing out this issue. This does not affect the results or conclusions of the article. The corrected Fig. 1 and its legend appear below. The online version has been corrected. (Figure Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116909836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bd067db2-6319-3bf7-a4ab-23fabf31b14e/
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2115789118
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2115789118
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 34607965
AN - SCOPUS:85116909836
VL - 118
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
SN - 0027-8424
IS - 41
M1 - e2115789118
ER -
ID: 87564645