Standard

Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease : A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group. / Gauhar, Vineet; Traxer, Olivier; Fong, Khi Yung; Sietz, Christian; Chew, Ben Hall; Bin Hamri, Saeed; Gökce, Mehmet Ilker; Gadzhiev, Nariman; Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei; Malkhasyan, Vigen; Ragoori, Deepak; Tanidir, Yiloren; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar; Castellani, Daniele.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.2025, p. 42-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Gauhar, V, Traxer, O, Fong, KY, Sietz, C, Chew, BH, Bin Hamri, S, Gökce, MI, Gadzhiev, N, Yuen, SKK, Malkhasyan, V, Ragoori, D, Tanidir, Y, Somani, BK & Castellani, D 2025, 'Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group', Journal of Endourology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0653

APA

Gauhar, V., Traxer, O., Fong, K. Y., Sietz, C., Chew, B. H., Bin Hamri, S., Gökce, M. I., Gadzhiev, N., Yuen, S. K. K., Malkhasyan, V., Ragoori, D., Tanidir, Y., Somani, B. K., & Castellani, D. (2025). Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group. Journal of Endourology, 39(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0653

Vancouver

Author

Gauhar, Vineet ; Traxer, Olivier ; Fong, Khi Yung ; Sietz, Christian ; Chew, Ben Hall ; Bin Hamri, Saeed ; Gökce, Mehmet Ilker ; Gadzhiev, Nariman ; Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei ; Malkhasyan, Vigen ; Ragoori, Deepak ; Tanidir, Yiloren ; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar ; Castellani, Daniele. / Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease : A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group. In: Journal of Endourology. 2025 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 42-49.

BibTeX

@article{f829236e8ef34f9da173335590f12d0b,
title = "Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group",
abstract = "Objective: We aim to evaluate stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) for kidney stones, using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS), comparing thulium fiber laser (TFL) and high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (HPHL). Methods: Data from adults who underwent F-URS in 15 centers were prospectively analyzed (August 2023-January 2024). Exclusion criteria were ureteral stones, concomitant bilateral procedures, and renal abnormalities. One-to-one propensity score matching for age, gender, stone location, stone volume, and Hounsfield unit was performed. SFR was assessed using computed tomography scan within 30 days and defined as zero fragments. Data are presented as median (25th-75th quartiles). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of SFR. Results: Of included patients, HPHL was used in 114 patients and TFL in 181 patients. After matching, 96 patients from each group with similar baseline characteristics were included. There was no difference between the groups regarding the use of disposable scopes, lithotripsy mode, and ureteroscopy, lasing and total surgical time. There was no case of sepsis, and blood transfusion was necessary for only one patient in the HPHL group. The incidence of transient fever was similar (3.4% in HPHL vs 3.8% in TFL group). Postoperative day 1 loin pain did not differ significantly. Postoperative stay did not differ significantly [1 [0, 2] in HPHL vs 1 [0, 1] days in TFL group, p = 0.12]. Thirty-day SFR was similar (52.1% for HL vs 64.6% for TFL group, p = 0.11). At multivariable analysis, the use of TFL (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.82) was significantly associated with higher odds of being stone-free. Conclusions: Both lasers are safe and efficacious and can be suitably used for F-URS with FANS with high SFR and minimal complications.",
keywords = "Humans, Ureteroscopy/methods, Kidney Calculi/therapy, Propensity Score, Female, Male, Lithotripsy, Laser/methods, Thulium, Middle Aged, Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use, Suction/instrumentation, Adult, Ureteroscopes, Treatment Outcome, Aged, thulium fiber laser, retrograde intrarenal surgery, flexible ureteroscopy, laser lithotripsy, kidney calculi, holmium laser",
author = "Vineet Gauhar and Olivier Traxer and Fong, {Khi Yung} and Christian Sietz and Chew, {Ben Hall} and {Bin Hamri}, Saeed and G{\"o}kce, {Mehmet Ilker} and Nariman Gadzhiev and Yuen, {Steffi Kar Kei} and Vigen Malkhasyan and Deepak Ragoori and Yiloren Tanidir and Somani, {Bhaskar Kumar} and Daniele Castellani",
year = "2025",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1089/end.2024.0653",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "42--49",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease

T2 - A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group

AU - Gauhar, Vineet

AU - Traxer, Olivier

AU - Fong, Khi Yung

AU - Sietz, Christian

AU - Chew, Ben Hall

AU - Bin Hamri, Saeed

AU - Gökce, Mehmet Ilker

AU - Gadzhiev, Nariman

AU - Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei

AU - Malkhasyan, Vigen

AU - Ragoori, Deepak

AU - Tanidir, Yiloren

AU - Somani, Bhaskar Kumar

AU - Castellani, Daniele

PY - 2025/1

Y1 - 2025/1

N2 - Objective: We aim to evaluate stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) for kidney stones, using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS), comparing thulium fiber laser (TFL) and high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (HPHL). Methods: Data from adults who underwent F-URS in 15 centers were prospectively analyzed (August 2023-January 2024). Exclusion criteria were ureteral stones, concomitant bilateral procedures, and renal abnormalities. One-to-one propensity score matching for age, gender, stone location, stone volume, and Hounsfield unit was performed. SFR was assessed using computed tomography scan within 30 days and defined as zero fragments. Data are presented as median (25th-75th quartiles). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of SFR. Results: Of included patients, HPHL was used in 114 patients and TFL in 181 patients. After matching, 96 patients from each group with similar baseline characteristics were included. There was no difference between the groups regarding the use of disposable scopes, lithotripsy mode, and ureteroscopy, lasing and total surgical time. There was no case of sepsis, and blood transfusion was necessary for only one patient in the HPHL group. The incidence of transient fever was similar (3.4% in HPHL vs 3.8% in TFL group). Postoperative day 1 loin pain did not differ significantly. Postoperative stay did not differ significantly [1 [0, 2] in HPHL vs 1 [0, 1] days in TFL group, p = 0.12]. Thirty-day SFR was similar (52.1% for HL vs 64.6% for TFL group, p = 0.11). At multivariable analysis, the use of TFL (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.82) was significantly associated with higher odds of being stone-free. Conclusions: Both lasers are safe and efficacious and can be suitably used for F-URS with FANS with high SFR and minimal complications.

AB - Objective: We aim to evaluate stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) for kidney stones, using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS), comparing thulium fiber laser (TFL) and high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (HPHL). Methods: Data from adults who underwent F-URS in 15 centers were prospectively analyzed (August 2023-January 2024). Exclusion criteria were ureteral stones, concomitant bilateral procedures, and renal abnormalities. One-to-one propensity score matching for age, gender, stone location, stone volume, and Hounsfield unit was performed. SFR was assessed using computed tomography scan within 30 days and defined as zero fragments. Data are presented as median (25th-75th quartiles). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of SFR. Results: Of included patients, HPHL was used in 114 patients and TFL in 181 patients. After matching, 96 patients from each group with similar baseline characteristics were included. There was no difference between the groups regarding the use of disposable scopes, lithotripsy mode, and ureteroscopy, lasing and total surgical time. There was no case of sepsis, and blood transfusion was necessary for only one patient in the HPHL group. The incidence of transient fever was similar (3.4% in HPHL vs 3.8% in TFL group). Postoperative day 1 loin pain did not differ significantly. Postoperative stay did not differ significantly [1 [0, 2] in HPHL vs 1 [0, 1] days in TFL group, p = 0.12]. Thirty-day SFR was similar (52.1% for HL vs 64.6% for TFL group, p = 0.11). At multivariable analysis, the use of TFL (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.82) was significantly associated with higher odds of being stone-free. Conclusions: Both lasers are safe and efficacious and can be suitably used for F-URS with FANS with high SFR and minimal complications.

KW - Humans

KW - Ureteroscopy/methods

KW - Kidney Calculi/therapy

KW - Propensity Score

KW - Female

KW - Male

KW - Lithotripsy, Laser/methods

KW - Thulium

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use

KW - Suction/instrumentation

KW - Adult

KW - Ureteroscopes

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Aged

KW - thulium fiber laser

KW - retrograde intrarenal surgery

KW - flexible ureteroscopy

KW - laser lithotripsy

KW - kidney calculi

KW - holmium laser

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/afaa6f32-d8e5-3d75-a1fe-96bc926802f9/

U2 - 10.1089/end.2024.0653

DO - 10.1089/end.2024.0653

M3 - Article

C2 - 39676748

VL - 39

SP - 42

EP - 49

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 135969230