Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities. / Ланкина, Ольга Юрьевна; Пец, Юлия Викторовна.
In: CEFR Journal – Research and Practice, Vol. 3, No. October (2020), 2020, p. 115 – 125.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities
AU - Ланкина, Ольга Юрьевна
AU - Пец, Юлия Викторовна
N1 - Olga Y. Lankina is a researcher. Her field of research includes language testing and mediation. She holds a specialist degree in applied linguistics and works as an ESP teacher and teacher of English for academic purposes at St. Petersburg State University (Russia). Olga is a Speaking Examiner and examiner trainer. In 2013-2014 she took part in linking the University test to the CoE. She is a member of EALTA and UKALTA.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Collaborating in a group and leading group work are often used in the modern language classroom. However, it still seems relevant to find an effective way to assess group discussions and to identify problems that students experiencewhen they have to mediate texts and concepts or collaborate on shared tasks. This paper analyzes the engagement of students with a task to mediate and discuss information in a group and how students approach the tasks at the B1 and B2 Council of Europe (CoE) or CEFR levels. The objective of this paper is to show that group discussions can be used for the formative and summative assessment of mediation skills as they are described in the CEFR Companion Volume (CEFR/CV; CoE 2018). We will describe the process of how learners can receive global achievement marks for mediation on par with analytical marks for interaction, discourse management, range, accuracy, and phonological control. We also provide an example of how assessment of a group discussion can be done by giving students a global achievement mark for mediation and analytical marks. The outcome of the research is a test that can be used in the classroom and to provide criteria for assessing mediation when it is part of a group discussion.
AB - Collaborating in a group and leading group work are often used in the modern language classroom. However, it still seems relevant to find an effective way to assess group discussions and to identify problems that students experiencewhen they have to mediate texts and concepts or collaborate on shared tasks. This paper analyzes the engagement of students with a task to mediate and discuss information in a group and how students approach the tasks at the B1 and B2 Council of Europe (CoE) or CEFR levels. The objective of this paper is to show that group discussions can be used for the formative and summative assessment of mediation skills as they are described in the CEFR Companion Volume (CEFR/CV; CoE 2018). We will describe the process of how learners can receive global achievement marks for mediation on par with analytical marks for interaction, discourse management, range, accuracy, and phonological control. We also provide an example of how assessment of a group discussion can be done by giving students a global achievement mark for mediation and analytical marks. The outcome of the research is a test that can be used in the classroom and to provide criteria for assessing mediation when it is part of a group discussion.
KW - mediation, classroom-based assessment, descriptors for mediation, global and analytical marks, CEFR/ CV, group discussion
M3 - Article
VL - 3
SP - 115
EP - 125
JO - CEFR journal
JF - CEFR journal
SN - 2434-849X
IS - October (2020)
ER -
ID: 90383384