Standard

Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities. / Ланкина, Ольга Юрьевна; Пец, Юлия Викторовна.

In: CEFR Journal – Research and Practice, Vol. 3, No. October (2020), 2020, p. 115 – 125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Ланкина, ОЮ & Пец, ЮВ 2020, 'Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities', CEFR Journal – Research and Practice, vol. 3, no. October (2020), pp. 115 – 125.

APA

Ланкина, О. Ю., & Пец, Ю. В. (2020). Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities. CEFR Journal – Research and Practice, 3(October (2020)), 115 – 125.

Vancouver

Ланкина ОЮ, Пец ЮВ. Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities. CEFR Journal – Research and Practice. 2020;3(October (2020)):115 – 125.

Author

Ланкина, Ольга Юрьевна ; Пец, Юлия Викторовна. / Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities. In: CEFR Journal – Research and Practice. 2020 ; Vol. 3, No. October (2020). pp. 115 – 125.

BibTeX

@article{cc93c4a2ac404aa6af03218dfd292823,
title = "Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities",
abstract = "Collaborating in a group and leading group work are often used in the modern language classroom. However, it still seems relevant to find an effective way to assess group discussions and to identify problems that students experiencewhen they have to mediate texts and concepts or collaborate on shared tasks. This paper analyzes the engagement of students with a task to mediate and discuss information in a group and how students approach the tasks at the B1 and B2 Council of Europe (CoE) or CEFR levels. The objective of this paper is to show that group discussions can be used for the formative and summative assessment of mediation skills as they are described in the CEFR Companion Volume (CEFR/CV; CoE 2018). We will describe the process of how learners can receive global achievement marks for mediation on par with analytical marks for interaction, discourse management, range, accuracy, and phonological control. We also provide an example of how assessment of a group discussion can be done by giving students a global achievement mark for mediation and analytical marks. The outcome of the research is a test that can be used in the classroom and to provide criteria for assessing mediation when it is part of a group discussion.",
keywords = "mediation, classroom-based assessment, descriptors for mediation, global and analytical marks, CEFR/ CV, group discussion",
author = "Ланкина, {Ольга Юрьевна} and Пец, {Юлия Викторовна}",
note = "Olga Y. Lankina is a researcher. Her field of research includes language testing and mediation. She holds a specialist degree in applied linguistics and works as an ESP teacher and teacher of English for academic purposes at St. Petersburg State University (Russia). Olga is a Speaking Examiner and examiner trainer. In 2013-2014 she took part in linking the University test to the CoE. She is a member of EALTA and UKALTA.",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "115 – 125",
journal = "CEFR journal",
issn = "2434-849X",
publisher = "Japan Association for Language Teaching",
number = "October (2020)",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classroom-based assessment of group discussion: Challenges and opportunities

AU - Ланкина, Ольга Юрьевна

AU - Пец, Юлия Викторовна

N1 - Olga Y. Lankina is a researcher. Her field of research includes language testing and mediation. She holds a specialist degree in applied linguistics and works as an ESP teacher and teacher of English for academic purposes at St. Petersburg State University (Russia). Olga is a Speaking Examiner and examiner trainer. In 2013-2014 she took part in linking the University test to the CoE. She is a member of EALTA and UKALTA.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Collaborating in a group and leading group work are often used in the modern language classroom. However, it still seems relevant to find an effective way to assess group discussions and to identify problems that students experiencewhen they have to mediate texts and concepts or collaborate on shared tasks. This paper analyzes the engagement of students with a task to mediate and discuss information in a group and how students approach the tasks at the B1 and B2 Council of Europe (CoE) or CEFR levels. The objective of this paper is to show that group discussions can be used for the formative and summative assessment of mediation skills as they are described in the CEFR Companion Volume (CEFR/CV; CoE 2018). We will describe the process of how learners can receive global achievement marks for mediation on par with analytical marks for interaction, discourse management, range, accuracy, and phonological control. We also provide an example of how assessment of a group discussion can be done by giving students a global achievement mark for mediation and analytical marks. The outcome of the research is a test that can be used in the classroom and to provide criteria for assessing mediation when it is part of a group discussion.

AB - Collaborating in a group and leading group work are often used in the modern language classroom. However, it still seems relevant to find an effective way to assess group discussions and to identify problems that students experiencewhen they have to mediate texts and concepts or collaborate on shared tasks. This paper analyzes the engagement of students with a task to mediate and discuss information in a group and how students approach the tasks at the B1 and B2 Council of Europe (CoE) or CEFR levels. The objective of this paper is to show that group discussions can be used for the formative and summative assessment of mediation skills as they are described in the CEFR Companion Volume (CEFR/CV; CoE 2018). We will describe the process of how learners can receive global achievement marks for mediation on par with analytical marks for interaction, discourse management, range, accuracy, and phonological control. We also provide an example of how assessment of a group discussion can be done by giving students a global achievement mark for mediation and analytical marks. The outcome of the research is a test that can be used in the classroom and to provide criteria for assessing mediation when it is part of a group discussion.

KW - mediation, classroom-based assessment, descriptors for mediation, global and analytical marks, CEFR/ CV, group discussion

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 115

EP - 125

JO - CEFR journal

JF - CEFR journal

SN - 2434-849X

IS - October (2020)

ER -

ID: 90383384