Classification of metaphors according to the degree of difficulty of their perception and their decoding from the standpoint of invariant semantics

Standard

Classification of metaphors according to the degree of difficulty of their perception and their decoding from the standpoint of invariant semantics. / Kiseleva, Svetlana V. ; Vinogradova, Svetlana A. ; Pesina, Svetlana A. ; Trofimova, Nella A. ; Abilova, Makhabat G. ; Prosyannikova, Olga I. .

In: Res Militaris, Vol. 12, No. 3, 11.2022, p. 2129-2141.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{cf7eb20192af4d6fbedd8f38898a3850,

title = "Classification of metaphors according to the degree of difficulty of their perception and their decoding from the standpoint of invariant semantics",

abstract = "The article attempts to determine the nature of meanings in the semantic space of the lexiconby revealing the content of metaphors. A three-level classification of metaphors is presentedwithin the scope of the article. Its main criterion is the degree of difficulties in their comprehension. The metaphors are arranged according to the principles of fluent and crystalized intelligence. A semantic structure of a word is viewed as a multi-level configuration of meanings.It is fixed by a dominant invariant meaning. The analysis of the English substantive “a leg” ispresented. We have developed a new approach to the phenomena under consideration called the invariant-component method. As a result, the obtained semantic metaphorical clusters havelead to the lexical invariant definition. The latter is viewed as a set of basic dominant components that form the semantic core of a polysemous word. The results of the study led to theconclusion that lexical invariants make it possible to successfully decode metaphors of the firstbasic level according to our classification.",

keywords = "meaning, semantics, semantic structure of the word, polysemous word, classification of metaphors, classification of metaphors, a polysemous word, a semantic structure of the word, semantics, a meaning",

author = "Kiseleva, {Svetlana V.} and Vinogradova, {Svetlana A.} and Pesina, {Svetlana A.} and Trofimova, {Nella A.} and Abilova, {Makhabat G.} and Prosyannikova, {Olga I.}",

note = "Pesina S.A., Kiseleva S.V., Vinogradova S.A., Trofimova N.A., Kabirova O.R., Abilova M.G., Prossyannikova O.I. Classification of metaphors according to the degree of difficulty of their perception and their decoding from the standpoint of invariant semantics",

year = "2022",

month = nov,

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "2129--2141",

journal = "Res Militaris",

issn = "2265-6294",

publisher = "Association Res Militaris",

number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of metaphors according to the degree of difficulty of their perception and their decoding from the standpoint of invariant semantics

AU - Kiseleva, Svetlana V.

AU - Vinogradova, Svetlana A.

AU - Pesina, Svetlana A.

AU - Trofimova, Nella A.

AU - Abilova, Makhabat G.

AU - Prosyannikova, Olga I.

N1 - Pesina S.A., Kiseleva S.V., Vinogradova S.A., Trofimova N.A., Kabirova O.R., Abilova M.G., Prossyannikova O.I. Classification of metaphors according to the degree of difficulty of their perception and their decoding from the standpoint of invariant semantics

PY - 2022/11

Y1 - 2022/11

N2 - The article attempts to determine the nature of meanings in the semantic space of the lexiconby revealing the content of metaphors. A three-level classification of metaphors is presentedwithin the scope of the article. Its main criterion is the degree of difficulties in their comprehension. The metaphors are arranged according to the principles of fluent and crystalized intelligence. A semantic structure of a word is viewed as a multi-level configuration of meanings.It is fixed by a dominant invariant meaning. The analysis of the English substantive “a leg” ispresented. We have developed a new approach to the phenomena under consideration called the invariant-component method. As a result, the obtained semantic metaphorical clusters havelead to the lexical invariant definition. The latter is viewed as a set of basic dominant components that form the semantic core of a polysemous word. The results of the study led to theconclusion that lexical invariants make it possible to successfully decode metaphors of the firstbasic level according to our classification.

AB - The article attempts to determine the nature of meanings in the semantic space of the lexiconby revealing the content of metaphors. A three-level classification of metaphors is presentedwithin the scope of the article. Its main criterion is the degree of difficulties in their comprehension. The metaphors are arranged according to the principles of fluent and crystalized intelligence. A semantic structure of a word is viewed as a multi-level configuration of meanings.It is fixed by a dominant invariant meaning. The analysis of the English substantive “a leg” ispresented. We have developed a new approach to the phenomena under consideration called the invariant-component method. As a result, the obtained semantic metaphorical clusters havelead to the lexical invariant definition. The latter is viewed as a set of basic dominant components that form the semantic core of a polysemous word. The results of the study led to theconclusion that lexical invariants make it possible to successfully decode metaphors of the firstbasic level according to our classification.

KW - meaning

KW - semantics

KW - semantic structure of the word

KW - polysemous word

KW - classification of metaphors

KW - a polysemous word

KW - a semantic structure of the word

KW - semantics

KW - a meaning

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 2129

EP - 2141

JO - Res Militaris

JF - Res Militaris

SN - 2265-6294

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 103036567