Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice. / Smorgunov, Leonid.
Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers. ed. / Alexander V. Boukhanovsky; Andrei V. Chugunov; Daniel A. Alexandrov; Yury Kabanov; Olessia Koltsova. Springer Nature, 2018. p. 13-23 2 (Communications in Computer and Information Science; Vol. 858).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice
AU - Smorgunov, Leonid
N1 - Smorgunov L. Blockchain and a Problem of Procedural Justice of Public Choice. Digital Transformation and Global Society. Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 30 – June 2, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Verlag: Springer International Publishing, 2018, p. 13-23.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).
AB - In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).
KW - Active citizen
KW - Autonomous identity
KW - Blockchain
KW - Collaboration
KW - Procedural justice
KW - Reciprocity
KW - Reputation
KW - Trust
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057097077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/blockchain-problem-procedural-justice-public-choice
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85057097077
SN - 9783030028428
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 13
EP - 23
BT - Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers
A2 - Boukhanovsky, Alexander V.
A2 - Chugunov, Andrei V.
A2 - Alexandrov, Daniel A.
A2 - Kabanov, Yury
A2 - Koltsova, Olessia
PB - Springer Nature
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society, DTGS 2018
Y2 - 30 May 2018 through 2 June 2018
ER -
ID: 35633331