TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of Factors Influencing Educational Effectiveness in Higher Educational Institutions

AU - Васильев, Юрий Николаевич

AU - Васильева, Полина Александровна

AU - Батова, Ольга Владимировна

AU - Цветкова, Анна Юрьевна

N1 - References Liu, F.; Xu, H. Effects of Educational Efficiency on National Competitiveness Based on Cross-National Data. Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Almazova, N.; Krylova, E.; Rubtsova, A.; Odinokaya, M. Challenges and Opportunities for Russian Higher Education amid COVID-19: Teachers’ Perspective. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Alvarez-Sández, D.; Velázquez-Victorica, K.; Mungaray-Moctezuma, A.; López-Guerrero, A. Administrative Processes Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] McNamara, A. Crisis Management in Higher Education in the Time of COVID-19: The Case of Actor Training. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Litvinenko, V.S.; Petrov, E.I.; Vasilevskaya, D.V.; Yakovenko, A.V.; Naumov, I.A.; Ratnikov, M.A. Assessment of the role of the state in the management of mineral resources. J. Min. Inst. 2023, 259, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Zvonnikov, V.I.; Chelyshkova, M.B. Quality Control during Training Certification: A Competency-Based Approach; Logos: Moscow, Russia, 2009; p. 272. [Google Scholar] Qazi, Z.; Qazi, W.; Raza, S.A.; Yousufi, S.Q. The Antecedents Affecting University Reputation and Student Satisfaction: A Study in Higher Education Context. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2022, 25, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Brits, H.J. A quest for waste reduction at institutions of higher learning: Investigating the integration of Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma methodologies with total quality management. S. Afr. J. High. Educ. 2018, 32, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mulyana, I.J.; Singgih, M.L.; Partiwi, S.G.; Hermanto, Y.B. Identification and Prioritization of LeanWaste in Higher Education Institutions (HEI): A Proposed Framework. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Klein, L.L.; Alves, A.C.; Abreu, M.F.; Feltrin, T.S. Lean management and sustainable practices in Higher Education Institutions of Brazil and Portugal: A cross country perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 342, 130868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Antony, J.; Ghadge, A.; Ashby, S.A.; Cudney, E.A. Lean Six Sigma journey in a UK higher education institute: A case study. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2018, 35, 510–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Khandan, R.; Shannon, L. The Effect of Teaching–Learning Environments on Student’s Engagement with Lean Mindset. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Naveed Bin Rais, R.; Rashid, M.; Zakria, M.; Hussain, S.; Qadir, J.; Imran, M.A. Employing Industrial Quality Management Systems for Quality Assurance in Outcome-Based Engineering Education: A Review. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Nasim, K.; Sikander, A.; Tian, X. Twenty years of research on total quality management in Higher Education: A systematic literature review. High. Educ. Q. 2020, 74, 75–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Vlašić, S.; Vale, S.; Puhar, D.K. Quality management in education. Interdiscip. Manag. Res. 2009, 5, 565–573. [Google Scholar] Gundić, A.; Županović, D.; Grbić, L.; Baric, M. Conceptual Model of Measuring MHEI Effiency. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Inga, E.; Inga, J.; Cárdenas, J.; Cárdenas, J. Planning and Strategic Management of Higher Education Considering the Vision of Latin America. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Halkiotis, D.; Konteles, I.; Brinia, V. The Technical Efficiency of High Schools: The Case of a Greek Prefecture. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kenny, J. Effciency and Effectiveness in Higher Education: Who is Accountable for what? Aust. Univ. Rev. 2008, 50, 11–19. [Google Scholar] Massy, W. Metrics for Efficiency and Effectiveness in Higher Education: Completing the Completion Agenda. In Proceedings of the State Higher Education Executive Officers’ (SHEEO) Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO, USA, 4–6 November 2011. [Google Scholar] Lockheed, M.E.; Hanushek, E.A. Concepts of Educational Efficiency and Effectiveness; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar] López, S.A.; Albíter, R.A.; Ramírez, R.L. Terminal efficiency in Higher Education, the need for a new paradigm. Rev. Educ. Super. 2008, 146, 135–151. [Google Scholar] Deming, W. Out of the Crisis; MIT Press, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar] Leguey Galán, S.; Matosas López, L. De qué depende la satisfacción del alumnado con la actividad docente? Espacios 2018, 39, 13–29. [Google Scholar] Wyness, G. Deserving Poor: Are Higher Education Bursaries Going to the Right Students? Educ. Sci. 2016, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Marshall, S.J. Internal and External Stakeholders in Higher Education. In Shaping the University of the Future; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 77–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Duan, M.; Dong, F.; Wang, J. Student-Centered Assessment Research on Holographic Learning Paradigm Based on Intelligent Analytic Hierarchy Process in Teaching of Bridge Engineering Course. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kosor, M. Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education: Concepts, Methods and Perspective. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 106, 1031–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Agasisti, T. Management of Higher Education Institutions and the Evaluation of Their Efficiency and Performance. Tert. Educ. Manag. 2017, 23, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Litvinenko, V.; Bowbrick, I.; Naumov, I.; Zaitseva, Z. Global guidelines and requirements for professional competencies of natural resource extraction engineers: Implications for ESG principles and sustainable development goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 338, 130530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Rosak-Szyrocka, J.; Apostu, S.A.; Ali Turi, J.; Tanveer, A. University 4.0 Sustainable Development in the Way of Society 5.0. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Žaleniene, I.; Pereira, P. Higher Education for Sustainability: A Global Perspective. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 2, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kuzminskaya, T.P. Problems of improving the quality of education in Russian universities. J. Econ. Regul. 2017, 8, 118–132. [Google Scholar] Shendaleva, O.A. Improvement and development of the quality management system in organizations of higher professional education. Vestn. Omsk. Yuridicheskogo Inst. 2010, 1, 102–104. [Google Scholar] Kaur, H.; Bhalla, G.S. Determinants of Effectiveness in Public Higher Education—Students’ Viewpoint. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2018, 32, 1135–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Dyatlov, A.V.; Kovalev, V.V. Efficiency of management of higher education in Russia in the practices of application of managerial tools. Bull. Inst. Sociol. 2023, 4, 70–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ramírez-Correa, P.; Peña-Vinces, J.C.; Alfaro-Pérez, J. Evaluating the Efficiency of the Higher Education System in Emerging Economies: Empirical Evidences from Chilean Universities. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2012, 6, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Rudnik, S.N.; Afanasev, V.G.; Samylovskaya, E.A. 250 years in the service of the Fatherland: Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mininbg university in facts and figures. J. Min. Inst. 2023, 263, 810–830. [Google Scholar] Bondareva, O.N.; Egorenkova, N.A.; Shchukina, D.A. To the Origins of Humanitarian Education at the Saint-Petersburg Mining University. Vopr. Istor. 2021, 12, 89–101. [Google Scholar] Ponomarenko, T.V.; Nevskaya, M.A.; Marinina, O.A. Innovative learning methods in technical universities: The possibility of forming interdisciplinary competencies. Espacios 2019, 40, 16. [Google Scholar] Katuntsov, E.V.; Kultan, J.; Makhovikov, A.B. Application of electronic learning tools for training of specialists in the field of information technologies for enterprises of mineral resources sector. J. Min. Inst. 2017, 226, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Shchukina, D.A.; Egorenkova, N.A.; Bondareva, O.N.; Grillo, S.V.C. The Charter of Saint-Petersburg Mining University as a Historical and Cultural Document. Eur. J. Contemp. Educ. 2020, 9, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] Oblova, I.S.; Gagarina, O.Y. Maria Kell-Continuer of the famous scientific dynasty. Gornyi Zhurnal 2023, 2023, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Gerasimova, I.G.; Oblova, I.S. Scientific heritage of professor G. V. Illyuvieva. Obogashchenie Rud. 2022, 2022, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mokeev, A.B.; Podolsky, S.I.; Yanchenko, D.G. Mining industry and education in the kingdom of Poland in the second half of the 19th-early 20th centuries. Bylye Gody 2021, 16, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Rudnik, S.; Mokeev, A.; Kudryavtseva, R. Russian and Western European mining schools in the first half of the 19th century: A comparative analysis of educational process organization. Bylye Gody 2020, 58, 2514–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Dorofeev, D.Y.; Borovkova, N.V.; Vasileva, M.A. Mining Museum as a space of science and education in Mining University. J. Min. Inst. 2023, 263, 674–686. [Google Scholar]

PY - 2024/6/7

Y1 - 2024/6/7

N2 - This paper discusses the results of the study of educational effectiveness at the tertiary level. It contains an overview of the research considering the quality and effectiveness of higher education development, the issues of creating criteria for their assessment and measurement. The four groups of factors (“Man”, “Milieu”, “Material”, “Method”) for evaluating educational effectiveness were determined, totally including 65 points. The results of the students’ surveys revealed the most significant factors as well as the least crucial ones influencing educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. The total number of respondents was 279. It was found that the subgroup of factors “Teacher’s competence” is the most important from the viewpoint of the respondents, while the subgroup “Infrastructure facilities” is the least valuable one. The priority measures list was given, the implementation of which will make it possible to increase educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. Methods such as Ishikawa diagram building, brainstorming and the survey of students were used for achieving the objectives of this research.

AB - This paper discusses the results of the study of educational effectiveness at the tertiary level. It contains an overview of the research considering the quality and effectiveness of higher education development, the issues of creating criteria for their assessment and measurement. The four groups of factors (“Man”, “Milieu”, “Material”, “Method”) for evaluating educational effectiveness were determined, totally including 65 points. The results of the students’ surveys revealed the most significant factors as well as the least crucial ones influencing educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. The total number of respondents was 279. It was found that the subgroup of factors “Teacher’s competence” is the most important from the viewpoint of the respondents, while the subgroup “Infrastructure facilities” is the least valuable one. The priority measures list was given, the implementation of which will make it possible to increase educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. Methods such as Ishikawa diagram building, brainstorming and the survey of students were used for achieving the objectives of this research.

KW - education; effectiveness; efficiency; factors; quality; higher education

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/84a1cf5b-0529-37bf-886d-671ed2a78a4c/

U2 - 10.3390/su16124886

DO - 10.3390/su16124886

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 12

M1 - 4886

ER -