Standard

ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED? / PEREDO, M; STERN, DP; TSYGANENKO, NA.

In: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, Vol. 98, No. A9, 01.09.1993, p. 15343-15354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

PEREDO, M, STERN, DP & TSYGANENKO, NA 1993, 'ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED?', JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, vol. 98, no. A9, pp. 15343-15354. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA01150

APA

PEREDO, M., STERN, DP., & TSYGANENKO, NA. (1993). ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED? JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 98(A9), 15343-15354. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA01150

Vancouver

PEREDO M, STERN DP, TSYGANENKO NA. ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED? JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE. 1993 Sep 1;98(A9):15343-15354. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA01150

Author

PEREDO, M ; STERN, DP ; TSYGANENKO, NA. / ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED?. In: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE. 1993 ; Vol. 98, No. A9. pp. 15343-15354.

BibTeX

@article{d792cac20ced46899a41590688b2e6e4,
title = "ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED?",
abstract = "The distribution of the average north-south magnetic field component [B(z)] in the vicinity of the neutral sheet has been investigated. This component is crucial for mappings between the nightside polar ionosphere and the equatorial magnetosphere. Data sets consisting of approximately 0.5 R(E) averages of magnetic field observations by the IMP/HEOS and ISEE spacecraft have been compared to the field predicted by the Tsyganenko models T87 and T89. In agreement with recent studies by C. Huang (data with 4-s resolution), it was found that both T87 and T89 underestimate [B(z)] in the near tail region (x(GSM) = -10 to -22 R(E)) by as much as a factor of 2. Modified versions of the T87 model, incorporating plasma sheet warping, were obtained by fitting the model parameters via nonlinear least squares to the ISEE data set and yielded [B(z)] values in agreement with the ISEE data. The study reveals an enormous scatter among the observed baseline values of [B(z)] (on a time scale of 10-20 min), as well as intrinsic biases imposed by the mathematical structure of tail models. and these two factors (especially the first one) greatly limit the accuracy of model predictions of tail [B(z)]. In order to reduce the second factor, a localized tail model has been developed and was used to explore the spatial variations of [B(z)]. Comparisons between observations and models, both global and local, are presented. Finally, suggested guidelines for use of existing models and limitations of their use are discussed.",
keywords = "MAGNETIC-FIELD MODEL, NEUTRAL SHEET, EQUATORIAL MAGNETOTAIL, QUANTITATIVE MODELS, GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD, TAIL CURRENT SHEET, MODELING, Kp-INDEX",
author = "M PEREDO and DP STERN and NA TSYGANENKO",
year = "1993",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/93JA01150",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "15343--15354",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "A9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ARE EXISTING MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELS EXCESSIVELY STRETCHED?

AU - PEREDO, M

AU - STERN, DP

AU - TSYGANENKO, NA

PY - 1993/9/1

Y1 - 1993/9/1

N2 - The distribution of the average north-south magnetic field component [B(z)] in the vicinity of the neutral sheet has been investigated. This component is crucial for mappings between the nightside polar ionosphere and the equatorial magnetosphere. Data sets consisting of approximately 0.5 R(E) averages of magnetic field observations by the IMP/HEOS and ISEE spacecraft have been compared to the field predicted by the Tsyganenko models T87 and T89. In agreement with recent studies by C. Huang (data with 4-s resolution), it was found that both T87 and T89 underestimate [B(z)] in the near tail region (x(GSM) = -10 to -22 R(E)) by as much as a factor of 2. Modified versions of the T87 model, incorporating plasma sheet warping, were obtained by fitting the model parameters via nonlinear least squares to the ISEE data set and yielded [B(z)] values in agreement with the ISEE data. The study reveals an enormous scatter among the observed baseline values of [B(z)] (on a time scale of 10-20 min), as well as intrinsic biases imposed by the mathematical structure of tail models. and these two factors (especially the first one) greatly limit the accuracy of model predictions of tail [B(z)]. In order to reduce the second factor, a localized tail model has been developed and was used to explore the spatial variations of [B(z)]. Comparisons between observations and models, both global and local, are presented. Finally, suggested guidelines for use of existing models and limitations of their use are discussed.

AB - The distribution of the average north-south magnetic field component [B(z)] in the vicinity of the neutral sheet has been investigated. This component is crucial for mappings between the nightside polar ionosphere and the equatorial magnetosphere. Data sets consisting of approximately 0.5 R(E) averages of magnetic field observations by the IMP/HEOS and ISEE spacecraft have been compared to the field predicted by the Tsyganenko models T87 and T89. In agreement with recent studies by C. Huang (data with 4-s resolution), it was found that both T87 and T89 underestimate [B(z)] in the near tail region (x(GSM) = -10 to -22 R(E)) by as much as a factor of 2. Modified versions of the T87 model, incorporating plasma sheet warping, were obtained by fitting the model parameters via nonlinear least squares to the ISEE data set and yielded [B(z)] values in agreement with the ISEE data. The study reveals an enormous scatter among the observed baseline values of [B(z)] (on a time scale of 10-20 min), as well as intrinsic biases imposed by the mathematical structure of tail models. and these two factors (especially the first one) greatly limit the accuracy of model predictions of tail [B(z)]. In order to reduce the second factor, a localized tail model has been developed and was used to explore the spatial variations of [B(z)]. Comparisons between observations and models, both global and local, are presented. Finally, suggested guidelines for use of existing models and limitations of their use are discussed.

KW - MAGNETIC-FIELD MODEL

KW - NEUTRAL SHEET

KW - EQUATORIAL MAGNETOTAIL

KW - QUANTITATIVE MODELS

KW - GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD

KW - TAIL CURRENT SHEET

KW - MODELING

KW - Kp-INDEX

U2 - 10.1029/93JA01150

DO - 10.1029/93JA01150

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 15343

EP - 15354

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

SN - 0148-0227

IS - A9

ER -

ID: 28014028