Standard

Arctic security perspectives from Russia. / Sergunin, Alexander.

Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security. ed. / Gunhild Gjørv. 1st Edition. ed. London : Taylor & Francis, 2020. p. 129-139.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Harvard

Sergunin, A 2020, Arctic security perspectives from Russia. in G Gjørv (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security. 1st Edition edn, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 129-139. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265797

APA

Sergunin, A. (2020). Arctic security perspectives from Russia. In G. Gjørv (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security (1st Edition ed., pp. 129-139). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265797

Vancouver

Sergunin A. Arctic security perspectives from Russia. In Gjørv G, editor, Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security. 1st Edition ed. London: Taylor & Francis. 2020. p. 129-139 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265797

Author

Sergunin, Alexander. / Arctic security perspectives from Russia. Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security. editor / Gunhild Gjørv. 1st Edition. ed. London : Taylor & Francis, 2020. pp. 129-139

BibTeX

@inbook{83c5cc57ce2342d592dc720d2b49128e,
title = "Arctic security perspectives from Russia",
abstract = "There has been a significant shift in Russia{\textquoteright}s threat perceptions and security policies in the High North. In contrast with the Cold War era, when the Arctic was a zone for global confrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States/NATO, this region is now seen by Moscow as a platform for international cooperation. Russia now believes that there are no serious hard security threats to it and that the soft security agenda is much more important. Russia{\textquoteright}s military power has new functions, such as ascertaining Russian sovereignty over its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf in the region, protecting Moscow{\textquoteright}s economic interests in the High North, and performing some other symbolic functions. Moscow believes that the regional cooperative agenda could include climate change mitigation, environmental protection, maritime safety, Arctic research, Indigenous peoples, cross- and trans-border cooperative projects, culture, etc.",
author = "Alexander Sergunin",
note = "Sergunin A. Arctic security perspectives from Russia // Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security. Ed. by Gunhild Hoogensen Gj{\o}rv, Marc Lanteigne, Horatio Sam-Aggrey. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020, pp. 129-139",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.4324/9781315265797",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781315265797",
pages = "129--139",
editor = "Gunhild Gj{\o}rv",
booktitle = "Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1st Edition",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Arctic security perspectives from Russia

AU - Sergunin, Alexander

N1 - Sergunin A. Arctic security perspectives from Russia // Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security. Ed. by Gunhild Hoogensen Gjørv, Marc Lanteigne, Horatio Sam-Aggrey. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020, pp. 129-139

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - There has been a significant shift in Russia’s threat perceptions and security policies in the High North. In contrast with the Cold War era, when the Arctic was a zone for global confrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States/NATO, this region is now seen by Moscow as a platform for international cooperation. Russia now believes that there are no serious hard security threats to it and that the soft security agenda is much more important. Russia’s military power has new functions, such as ascertaining Russian sovereignty over its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf in the region, protecting Moscow’s economic interests in the High North, and performing some other symbolic functions. Moscow believes that the regional cooperative agenda could include climate change mitigation, environmental protection, maritime safety, Arctic research, Indigenous peoples, cross- and trans-border cooperative projects, culture, etc.

AB - There has been a significant shift in Russia’s threat perceptions and security policies in the High North. In contrast with the Cold War era, when the Arctic was a zone for global confrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States/NATO, this region is now seen by Moscow as a platform for international cooperation. Russia now believes that there are no serious hard security threats to it and that the soft security agenda is much more important. Russia’s military power has new functions, such as ascertaining Russian sovereignty over its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf in the region, protecting Moscow’s economic interests in the High North, and performing some other symbolic functions. Moscow believes that the regional cooperative agenda could include climate change mitigation, environmental protection, maritime safety, Arctic research, Indigenous peoples, cross- and trans-border cooperative projects, culture, etc.

UR - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315265797/chapters/10.4324/9781315265797-11

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0db7fb6e-ae00-3bbf-b7e1-de76e3c5f032/

U2 - 10.4324/9781315265797

DO - 10.4324/9781315265797

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781315265797

SP - 129

EP - 139

BT - Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security

A2 - Gjørv, Gunhild

PB - Taylor & Francis

CY - London

ER -

ID: 71070952