TY - GEN

T1 - ANTI-CRISIS INDUSTRIAL POLICY OF THE RUSSIAN REGIONS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

AU - Рахман Хашими, Матиар Мизанурович

AU - Федоров, Андрей Владиславович

AU - Попов, Дмитрий Дмитриевич

AU - Кошкин, Андрей Вячеславович

AU - Шарагина, Арина Дмитриевна

AU - Яковлева, Екатерина Владимировна

PY - 2022/11/28

Y1 - 2022/11/28

N2 - This paper is aimed to systematize, classify and analyze the anti-crisis industrial policy measures taken bythe regional governments of the subjects of the Russian Federation during the COVID-19 pandemic in2020. Classification is carried out according to the following criteria: aim, scale, duration andproactivity/reactivity specific measures. Based on the results of the work, 91 measures from 32 subjectsof the Russian Federation were analyzed. The research sample includes 4 subjects from each of the 8federal districts of Russia. The total predominance of reactive measures (82) over proactive measures (9)was revealed. Only 6 measures in 32 regions were long-term, most (52) medium-term, as well as 33short-term. Due to the research results 14 measures were focused on maintaining demand, 77 – onmaintaining employment. At the same time, the majority of measures aimed to maintain demand wereminor-scale (11 out of 14) and short-term (12 out of 14). The article explains the popularity of certainmeasures. Thus, as the most popular measures of anti-crisis industrial policy can be called tax benefitsand exemptions for tenants of regional and municipal property. A number of conclusions were drawnregarding the political aspect of budget federalism in Russia (the special role of inter-budget transfers inregional industrial policy is noted), as well as the need to actualize the issue of the planning time-frame ofregional governments of the subjects of the Russian Federation, to study the correlation of effectivenessand proactivity/reactivity of anti-crisis industrial policy measures.

AB - This paper is aimed to systematize, classify and analyze the anti-crisis industrial policy measures taken bythe regional governments of the subjects of the Russian Federation during the COVID-19 pandemic in2020. Classification is carried out according to the following criteria: aim, scale, duration andproactivity/reactivity specific measures. Based on the results of the work, 91 measures from 32 subjectsof the Russian Federation were analyzed. The research sample includes 4 subjects from each of the 8federal districts of Russia. The total predominance of reactive measures (82) over proactive measures (9)was revealed. Only 6 measures in 32 regions were long-term, most (52) medium-term, as well as 33short-term. Due to the research results 14 measures were focused on maintaining demand, 77 – onmaintaining employment. At the same time, the majority of measures aimed to maintain demand wereminor-scale (11 out of 14) and short-term (12 out of 14). The article explains the popularity of certainmeasures. Thus, as the most popular measures of anti-crisis industrial policy can be called tax benefitsand exemptions for tenants of regional and municipal property. A number of conclusions were drawnregarding the political aspect of budget federalism in Russia (the special role of inter-budget transfers inregional industrial policy is noted), as well as the need to actualize the issue of the planning time-frame ofregional governments of the subjects of the Russian Federation, to study the correlation of effectivenessand proactivity/reactivity of anti-crisis industrial policy measures.

U2 - 10.15405/epsbs.2022.11.54

DO - 10.15405/epsbs.2022.11.54

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

SP - 386

EP - 397

BT - SCTCMG 2022 International Scientific Conference «Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism»

PB - European Publisher Ltd.

Y2 - 19 April 2022 through 21 April 2022

ER -