Standard

Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals. / Kosterov, A.; Sergienko, E. S.; Iosifidi, A. G.; Kharitonskii, P. V.; Yanson, S. Yu.

Problems of Geocosmos–2018: Proceedings of the XII International Conference and School. ed. / Tatiana Yanovskaya; Andrei Kosterov; Nikita Bobrov; Andrey Divin; Alexander Saraev; Nadezhda Zolotova. Cham : Springer Nature, 2020. p. 127-142 (Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kosterov, A, Sergienko, ES, Iosifidi, AG, Kharitonskii, PV & Yanson, SY 2020, Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals. in T Yanovskaya, A Kosterov, N Bobrov, A Divin, A Saraev & N Zolotova (eds), Problems of Geocosmos–2018: Proceedings of the XII International Conference and School. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences, Springer Nature, Cham, pp. 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_10

APA

Kosterov, A., Sergienko, E. S., Iosifidi, A. G., Kharitonskii, P. V., & Yanson, S. Y. (2020). Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals. In T. Yanovskaya, A. Kosterov, N. Bobrov, A. Divin, A. Saraev, & N. Zolotova (Eds.), Problems of Geocosmos–2018: Proceedings of the XII International Conference and School (pp. 127-142). (Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_10

Vancouver

Kosterov A, Sergienko ES, Iosifidi AG, Kharitonskii PV, Yanson SY. Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals. In Yanovskaya T, Kosterov A, Bobrov N, Divin A, Saraev A, Zolotova N, editors, Problems of Geocosmos–2018: Proceedings of the XII International Conference and School. Cham: Springer Nature. 2020. p. 127-142. (Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_10

Author

Kosterov, A. ; Sergienko, E. S. ; Iosifidi, A. G. ; Kharitonskii, P. V. ; Yanson, S. Yu. / Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals. Problems of Geocosmos–2018: Proceedings of the XII International Conference and School. editor / Tatiana Yanovskaya ; Andrei Kosterov ; Nikita Bobrov ; Andrey Divin ; Alexander Saraev ; Nadezhda Zolotova. Cham : Springer Nature, 2020. pp. 127-142 (Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences).

BibTeX

@inbook{b8d3805e63204921a53de7baf8d61ff4,
title = "Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals",
abstract = "To evaluate the effect of undersaturation of magnetic hysteresis loops measured in moderate (<2 T) fields in magnetically hard minerals such as goethite or hematite, we measured room temperature hysteresis loops in a 7 T field and DC backfield demagnetization curves in fields up to 3 T using an MPMS 3 instrument. Sediments from different regions of the East European platform, mostly of Carboniferous age were used for this study. Similar experiments were also carried out for a small collection of archaeological ceramics (bricks) apparently containing a High Coercivity Low unblocking Temperature (HCLT) magnetic phase (ε-Fe2O3?). Hysteresis measurements were complemented by thermomagnetic analysis at low and high temperatures, microscopic observations, and X-ray diffraction studies. High-field magnetic hysteresis loops alone appear insufficient to definitively discriminate goethite from hematite, though there is, expectedly, a tendency that increasing goethite content leads to magnetic hardening, with coercive force reaching 1 T and coercivity of remanence 1.7 T. At the same time, ε-Fe2O3 can seemingly be distinguished from either hematite or goethite due to its high saturation magnetization. However, combining hysteresis measurements with low- and high-temperature thermomagnetic analysis provides a much better insight into the magnetic mineralogy of samples. Still, acquiring the reference data on well characterized hematite, goethite, and ε-Fe2O3 samples is highly desirable.",
keywords = "Day-Dunlop plot, Goethite, HCLT phase, Hematite, Magnetic hysteresis",
author = "A. Kosterov and Sergienko, {E. S.} and Iosifidi, {A. G.} and Kharitonskii, {P. V.} and Yanson, {S. Yu}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_10",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-21787-7",
series = "Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
pages = "127--142",
editor = "Tatiana Yanovskaya and Andrei Kosterov and Nikita Bobrov and Andrey Divin and Alexander Saraev and Nadezhda Zolotova",
booktitle = "Problems of Geocosmos–2018",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Analysis of Strong-Field Hysteresis in High Coercivity Magnetic Minerals

AU - Kosterov, A.

AU - Sergienko, E. S.

AU - Iosifidi, A. G.

AU - Kharitonskii, P. V.

AU - Yanson, S. Yu

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - To evaluate the effect of undersaturation of magnetic hysteresis loops measured in moderate (<2 T) fields in magnetically hard minerals such as goethite or hematite, we measured room temperature hysteresis loops in a 7 T field and DC backfield demagnetization curves in fields up to 3 T using an MPMS 3 instrument. Sediments from different regions of the East European platform, mostly of Carboniferous age were used for this study. Similar experiments were also carried out for a small collection of archaeological ceramics (bricks) apparently containing a High Coercivity Low unblocking Temperature (HCLT) magnetic phase (ε-Fe2O3?). Hysteresis measurements were complemented by thermomagnetic analysis at low and high temperatures, microscopic observations, and X-ray diffraction studies. High-field magnetic hysteresis loops alone appear insufficient to definitively discriminate goethite from hematite, though there is, expectedly, a tendency that increasing goethite content leads to magnetic hardening, with coercive force reaching 1 T and coercivity of remanence 1.7 T. At the same time, ε-Fe2O3 can seemingly be distinguished from either hematite or goethite due to its high saturation magnetization. However, combining hysteresis measurements with low- and high-temperature thermomagnetic analysis provides a much better insight into the magnetic mineralogy of samples. Still, acquiring the reference data on well characterized hematite, goethite, and ε-Fe2O3 samples is highly desirable.

AB - To evaluate the effect of undersaturation of magnetic hysteresis loops measured in moderate (<2 T) fields in magnetically hard minerals such as goethite or hematite, we measured room temperature hysteresis loops in a 7 T field and DC backfield demagnetization curves in fields up to 3 T using an MPMS 3 instrument. Sediments from different regions of the East European platform, mostly of Carboniferous age were used for this study. Similar experiments were also carried out for a small collection of archaeological ceramics (bricks) apparently containing a High Coercivity Low unblocking Temperature (HCLT) magnetic phase (ε-Fe2O3?). Hysteresis measurements were complemented by thermomagnetic analysis at low and high temperatures, microscopic observations, and X-ray diffraction studies. High-field magnetic hysteresis loops alone appear insufficient to definitively discriminate goethite from hematite, though there is, expectedly, a tendency that increasing goethite content leads to magnetic hardening, with coercive force reaching 1 T and coercivity of remanence 1.7 T. At the same time, ε-Fe2O3 can seemingly be distinguished from either hematite or goethite due to its high saturation magnetization. However, combining hysteresis measurements with low- and high-temperature thermomagnetic analysis provides a much better insight into the magnetic mineralogy of samples. Still, acquiring the reference data on well characterized hematite, goethite, and ε-Fe2O3 samples is highly desirable.

KW - Day-Dunlop plot

KW - Goethite

KW - HCLT phase

KW - Hematite

KW - Magnetic hysteresis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088224221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_10

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_10

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85088224221

SN - 978-3-030-21787-7

T3 - Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences

SP - 127

EP - 142

BT - Problems of Geocosmos–2018

A2 - Yanovskaya, Tatiana

A2 - Kosterov, Andrei

A2 - Bobrov, Nikita

A2 - Divin, Andrey

A2 - Saraev, Alexander

A2 - Zolotova, Nadezhda

PB - Springer Nature

CY - Cham

ER -

ID: 46104229