Standard

Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media . / Bolgov, R.; Filatova, O.; Tarnavsky, A.

Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security. 2016. p. 37-47.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Harvard

Bolgov, R, Filatova, O & Tarnavsky, A 2016, Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media . in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security. pp. 37-47.

APA

Bolgov, R., Filatova, O., & Tarnavsky, A. (2016). Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security (pp. 37-47)

Vancouver

Bolgov R, Filatova O, Tarnavsky A. Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security. 2016. p. 37-47

Author

Bolgov, R. ; Filatova, O. ; Tarnavsky, A. / Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media . Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security. 2016. pp. 37-47

BibTeX

@inproceedings{717c75c483d048f794af78fe2278f0bc,
title = "Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media ",
abstract = "This paper provides an analysis of the reports in the Russian social media (Facebook, VK, Instagram and Twitter) during the escalation of the armed conflict in Donbas (from January to March 2015) on topics related to the conflict. These include institutional actors (the executive and legislative branches at the federal level and officially registered political parties) and political individuals. We examined only the textual messages belonging to the subjects of the sample. Reposts from the pages of other actors were not included in the database. The authors hypothesize the existence of two divergent discourses which characterize differently the armed Donbas conflict in the social media. To confirm the hypothesis the authors devised an analysis technique that is optimal for discourse analysis in political studies. The technique involves two levels of discourse analysis - identifying key conceptual metaphors in both alleged discourses (positively or negatively characterizing the Donbas insurgents) and the ident",
keywords = "Public Discourse, Conflict in Donbas, Social Media, Social media, Discourse Analysis.",
author = "R. Bolgov and O. Filatova and A. Tarnavsky",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "978 1 910810 82 8",
pages = "37--47",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Analysis of public discourse about the Donbas conflict inRussian social media 

AU - Bolgov, R.

AU - Filatova, O.

AU - Tarnavsky, A.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper provides an analysis of the reports in the Russian social media (Facebook, VK, Instagram and Twitter) during the escalation of the armed conflict in Donbas (from January to March 2015) on topics related to the conflict. These include institutional actors (the executive and legislative branches at the federal level and officially registered political parties) and political individuals. We examined only the textual messages belonging to the subjects of the sample. Reposts from the pages of other actors were not included in the database. The authors hypothesize the existence of two divergent discourses which characterize differently the armed Donbas conflict in the social media. To confirm the hypothesis the authors devised an analysis technique that is optimal for discourse analysis in political studies. The technique involves two levels of discourse analysis - identifying key conceptual metaphors in both alleged discourses (positively or negatively characterizing the Donbas insurgents) and the ident

AB - This paper provides an analysis of the reports in the Russian social media (Facebook, VK, Instagram and Twitter) during the escalation of the armed conflict in Donbas (from January to March 2015) on topics related to the conflict. These include institutional actors (the executive and legislative branches at the federal level and officially registered political parties) and political individuals. We examined only the textual messages belonging to the subjects of the sample. Reposts from the pages of other actors were not included in the database. The authors hypothesize the existence of two divergent discourses which characterize differently the armed Donbas conflict in the social media. To confirm the hypothesis the authors devised an analysis technique that is optimal for discourse analysis in political studies. The technique involves two levels of discourse analysis - identifying key conceptual metaphors in both alleged discourses (positively or negatively characterizing the Donbas insurgents) and the ident

KW - Public Discourse

KW - Conflict in Donbas

KW - Social Media

KW - Social media

KW - Discourse Analysis.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978 1 910810 82 8

SP - 37

EP - 47

BT - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security

ER -

ID: 7561524