Standard

A production/recycling model with quality consideration. / Dobos, Imre; Richter, Knut.

In: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 104, No. 2, 01.12.2006, p. 571-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Dobos, I & Richter, K 2006, 'A production/recycling model with quality consideration', International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006

APA

Dobos, I., & Richter, K. (2006). A production/recycling model with quality consideration. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006

Vancouver

Dobos I, Richter K. A production/recycling model with quality consideration. International Journal of Production Economics. 2006 Dec 1;104(2):571-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006

Author

Dobos, Imre ; Richter, Knut. / A production/recycling model with quality consideration. In: International Journal of Production Economics. 2006 ; Vol. 104, No. 2. pp. 571-579.

BibTeX

@article{b751e071ad0442e5a1ca2e6a7a27bc23,
title = "A production/recycling model with quality consideration",
abstract = "An integrated production-recycling system is investigated. A constant demand can be satisfied by production and recycling. The used items might be bought back and then recycled. The not recycled products are disposed off. Two types of models are analyzed. The first model examines and minimizes the EOQ related cost. The second model generalizes the first one by introducing additionally linear waste disposal, recycling, production and buyback costs. This basic model was examined by the authors in a previous paper. The main results are that a pure strategy (either production or recycling) is optimal. This paper extends the model for the case of quality consideration: it is asked for the quality of the bought back products. In the former model we have assumed that all returned items are serviceable. One can put the following question: Who should control the quality of the returned items? If the suppliers examine the quality of the reusable products, then the buyback rate is strongly smaller than one, α < 1. If the user does it, then not all returned items are recyclable, i.e. the use rate is smaller than one, δ < 1. Which one of the control systems are more cost advantageous in this case?",
keywords = "Cost minimization, EOQ model, Production, Quality, Recycling, Reverse logistics, Waste disposal",
author = "Imre Dobos and Knut Richter",
year = "2006",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "571--579",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A production/recycling model with quality consideration

AU - Dobos, Imre

AU - Richter, Knut

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - An integrated production-recycling system is investigated. A constant demand can be satisfied by production and recycling. The used items might be bought back and then recycled. The not recycled products are disposed off. Two types of models are analyzed. The first model examines and minimizes the EOQ related cost. The second model generalizes the first one by introducing additionally linear waste disposal, recycling, production and buyback costs. This basic model was examined by the authors in a previous paper. The main results are that a pure strategy (either production or recycling) is optimal. This paper extends the model for the case of quality consideration: it is asked for the quality of the bought back products. In the former model we have assumed that all returned items are serviceable. One can put the following question: Who should control the quality of the returned items? If the suppliers examine the quality of the reusable products, then the buyback rate is strongly smaller than one, α < 1. If the user does it, then not all returned items are recyclable, i.e. the use rate is smaller than one, δ < 1. Which one of the control systems are more cost advantageous in this case?

AB - An integrated production-recycling system is investigated. A constant demand can be satisfied by production and recycling. The used items might be bought back and then recycled. The not recycled products are disposed off. Two types of models are analyzed. The first model examines and minimizes the EOQ related cost. The second model generalizes the first one by introducing additionally linear waste disposal, recycling, production and buyback costs. This basic model was examined by the authors in a previous paper. The main results are that a pure strategy (either production or recycling) is optimal. This paper extends the model for the case of quality consideration: it is asked for the quality of the bought back products. In the former model we have assumed that all returned items are serviceable. One can put the following question: Who should control the quality of the returned items? If the suppliers examine the quality of the reusable products, then the buyback rate is strongly smaller than one, α < 1. If the user does it, then not all returned items are recyclable, i.e. the use rate is smaller than one, δ < 1. Which one of the control systems are more cost advantageous in this case?

KW - Cost minimization

KW - EOQ model

KW - Production

KW - Quality

KW - Recycling

KW - Reverse logistics

KW - Waste disposal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748945682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748945682

VL - 104

SP - 571

EP - 579

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 48975423