Standard

Античный стоицизм в русской периодике XIX века: особенности рецепции. / Попов, Данил Сергеевич; Мочалова, Ирина Николаевна.

In: SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2024, p. 387-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Попов, Данил Сергеевич ; Мочалова, Ирина Николаевна. / Античный стоицизм в русской периодике XIX века: особенности рецепции. In: SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ. 2024 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 387-409.

BibTeX

@article{ecd424655167453fa115cf1f76d8b8ef,
title = "Античный стоицизм в русской периодике XIX века: особенности рецепции",
abstract = "The scope of the study is the history of the reception of the Stoic legacy in Russian periodicals (journals, newspapers, collections of works) published during the 19th century. As to the character and content of publications written in the early 19th century and devoted to the Stoics, they continued the traditions of the 18th century. They retained edifying and entertaining character, demonstrating sometimes the lack of scholarship and originality. A landmark event that sparked an interest in the Stoics among educated Russian public was the broad discussion in a number of major journals and newspapers about the works of G. Boissier, C. Martha, and E. Renan translated into Russian or published in 1879-1881. In the last decades of the 19th century, periodicals in Russia contributed to the maintenance of interest in the philosophers of Portico as well. On the pages of journals and newspapers, moral strategies and religious views of the Stoics were extolled and overthrown; new translations of Stoic texts and critical works on the Stoics were actively discussed; certain aspects of Stoic ideas came into the focus of attention of publicists of various kinds - from revolutionaries to scholars and theologians. Due to the fact that periodicals had their own specificity, distinct from works written for scholars or students, they played an important role in shaping the reception of the Stoics in Russian society. They also contributed to the processes of forming a sound base for further Stoic (and more broadly, Ancient) studies in Russia in the early 20th century.",
keywords = "Russian periodicals of the 19th century, Russian philosophy, Stoic philosophy",
author = "Попов, {Данил Сергеевич} and Мочалова, {Ирина Николаевна}",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.25205/1995-4328-2024-18-1-387-409",
language = "русский",
volume = "18",
pages = "387--409",
journal = "SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ",
issn = "1995-4328",
publisher = "Издательство Новосибирского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Античный стоицизм в русской периодике XIX века: особенности рецепции

AU - Попов, Данил Сергеевич

AU - Мочалова, Ирина Николаевна

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - The scope of the study is the history of the reception of the Stoic legacy in Russian periodicals (journals, newspapers, collections of works) published during the 19th century. As to the character and content of publications written in the early 19th century and devoted to the Stoics, they continued the traditions of the 18th century. They retained edifying and entertaining character, demonstrating sometimes the lack of scholarship and originality. A landmark event that sparked an interest in the Stoics among educated Russian public was the broad discussion in a number of major journals and newspapers about the works of G. Boissier, C. Martha, and E. Renan translated into Russian or published in 1879-1881. In the last decades of the 19th century, periodicals in Russia contributed to the maintenance of interest in the philosophers of Portico as well. On the pages of journals and newspapers, moral strategies and religious views of the Stoics were extolled and overthrown; new translations of Stoic texts and critical works on the Stoics were actively discussed; certain aspects of Stoic ideas came into the focus of attention of publicists of various kinds - from revolutionaries to scholars and theologians. Due to the fact that periodicals had their own specificity, distinct from works written for scholars or students, they played an important role in shaping the reception of the Stoics in Russian society. They also contributed to the processes of forming a sound base for further Stoic (and more broadly, Ancient) studies in Russia in the early 20th century.

AB - The scope of the study is the history of the reception of the Stoic legacy in Russian periodicals (journals, newspapers, collections of works) published during the 19th century. As to the character and content of publications written in the early 19th century and devoted to the Stoics, they continued the traditions of the 18th century. They retained edifying and entertaining character, demonstrating sometimes the lack of scholarship and originality. A landmark event that sparked an interest in the Stoics among educated Russian public was the broad discussion in a number of major journals and newspapers about the works of G. Boissier, C. Martha, and E. Renan translated into Russian or published in 1879-1881. In the last decades of the 19th century, periodicals in Russia contributed to the maintenance of interest in the philosophers of Portico as well. On the pages of journals and newspapers, moral strategies and religious views of the Stoics were extolled and overthrown; new translations of Stoic texts and critical works on the Stoics were actively discussed; certain aspects of Stoic ideas came into the focus of attention of publicists of various kinds - from revolutionaries to scholars and theologians. Due to the fact that periodicals had their own specificity, distinct from works written for scholars or students, they played an important role in shaping the reception of the Stoics in Russian society. They also contributed to the processes of forming a sound base for further Stoic (and more broadly, Ancient) studies in Russia in the early 20th century.

KW - Russian periodicals of the 19th century

KW - Russian philosophy

KW - Stoic philosophy

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9642e283-50bf-3918-8800-0275da08a59b/

U2 - 10.25205/1995-4328-2024-18-1-387-409

DO - 10.25205/1995-4328-2024-18-1-387-409

M3 - статья

VL - 18

SP - 387

EP - 409

JO - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

JF - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

SN - 1995-4328

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 121302483