Standard

Историческая наука и петербургский историк Фроянов. Часть 2. / Дворниченко, Андрей Юрьевич.

In: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2021, p. 677-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Дворниченко, АЮ 2021, 'Историческая наука и петербургский историк Фроянов. Часть 2', ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 677-698. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.301

APA

Дворниченко, А. Ю. (2021). Историческая наука и петербургский историк Фроянов. Часть 2. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ, 66(3), 677-698. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.301

Vancouver

Author

Дворниченко, Андрей Юрьевич. / Историческая наука и петербургский историк Фроянов. Часть 2. In: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ. 2021 ; Vol. 66, No. 3. pp. 677-698.

BibTeX

@article{246fc6639c53492595c5afb36b7dff80,
title = "Историческая наука и петербургский историк Фроянов. Часть 2",
abstract = "This article is devoted to the scholarly work of the prominent Russian historian Igor Iakovlevich Froianov who died last December. He is a brilliant representative of the Petersburg Historical School, and first and foremost — a well-known specialist in the history of so called Kievan Rus. He created a complex concept of the “obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus. His concept is ultimately comprehensive because he studied in consecutive order practically all sides of such a phenomenon as Kievan Rus: economy, political life, social struggle, culture. His concept emerged in confrontation with the prevalent Soviet vision of this history, and at the same time from the very beginning it became a creative continuation and development of pre-revolution historiography. He also devoted several interesting and important works to the period of Moscow Rus, particularly to the process of formation of the Russian monarchy. These works made an excellent foundation for the new original view of this epoch of the Russian history, different from other concepts. Froianov{\textquoteright}s legacy is divided into two parts: before and after the middle of the 1990s when so called “perestroika” took place in the USSR. On the one hand, he continued to study the old time. On the other hand, a number of his later works are devoted to the history of Russian revolution (1917) and to the above-mentioned “perestroika”. These works are closely connected with a publicistic genre which captivated him in those years. However, it is to a certain extent a continuation of his previous interests as these works are dedicated to the same Russian-Orthodox Civilization.",
keywords = "I. Ya. Froianov, Kievan Russia, Moscow Rus, “Obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus, “October of 1917”, “Submersion in the abyss”, {"}October of 1917{"}, {"}Submersion in the abyss{"}, {"}obcshinno-vechevaia{"} civilization of Old Rus, I. Ya. Froianov, Kievan Russia, Moscow Rus, “Obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus, “October of 1917”, “Submersion in the abyss”",
author = "Дворниченко, {Андрей Юрьевич}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.301",
language = "русский",
volume = "66",
pages = "677--698",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ",
issn = "1812-9323",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Историческая наука и петербургский историк Фроянов. Часть 2

AU - Дворниченко, Андрей Юрьевич

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This article is devoted to the scholarly work of the prominent Russian historian Igor Iakovlevich Froianov who died last December. He is a brilliant representative of the Petersburg Historical School, and first and foremost — a well-known specialist in the history of so called Kievan Rus. He created a complex concept of the “obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus. His concept is ultimately comprehensive because he studied in consecutive order practically all sides of such a phenomenon as Kievan Rus: economy, political life, social struggle, culture. His concept emerged in confrontation with the prevalent Soviet vision of this history, and at the same time from the very beginning it became a creative continuation and development of pre-revolution historiography. He also devoted several interesting and important works to the period of Moscow Rus, particularly to the process of formation of the Russian monarchy. These works made an excellent foundation for the new original view of this epoch of the Russian history, different from other concepts. Froianov’s legacy is divided into two parts: before and after the middle of the 1990s when so called “perestroika” took place in the USSR. On the one hand, he continued to study the old time. On the other hand, a number of his later works are devoted to the history of Russian revolution (1917) and to the above-mentioned “perestroika”. These works are closely connected with a publicistic genre which captivated him in those years. However, it is to a certain extent a continuation of his previous interests as these works are dedicated to the same Russian-Orthodox Civilization.

AB - This article is devoted to the scholarly work of the prominent Russian historian Igor Iakovlevich Froianov who died last December. He is a brilliant representative of the Petersburg Historical School, and first and foremost — a well-known specialist in the history of so called Kievan Rus. He created a complex concept of the “obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus. His concept is ultimately comprehensive because he studied in consecutive order practically all sides of such a phenomenon as Kievan Rus: economy, political life, social struggle, culture. His concept emerged in confrontation with the prevalent Soviet vision of this history, and at the same time from the very beginning it became a creative continuation and development of pre-revolution historiography. He also devoted several interesting and important works to the period of Moscow Rus, particularly to the process of formation of the Russian monarchy. These works made an excellent foundation for the new original view of this epoch of the Russian history, different from other concepts. Froianov’s legacy is divided into two parts: before and after the middle of the 1990s when so called “perestroika” took place in the USSR. On the one hand, he continued to study the old time. On the other hand, a number of his later works are devoted to the history of Russian revolution (1917) and to the above-mentioned “perestroika”. These works are closely connected with a publicistic genre which captivated him in those years. However, it is to a certain extent a continuation of his previous interests as these works are dedicated to the same Russian-Orthodox Civilization.

KW - I. Ya. Froianov

KW - Kievan Russia

KW - Moscow Rus

KW - “Obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus

KW - “October of 1917”

KW - “Submersion in the abyss”

KW - "October of 1917"

KW - "Submersion in the abyss"

KW - "obcshinno-vechevaia" civilization of Old Rus

KW - I. Ya. Froianov

KW - Kievan Russia

KW - Moscow Rus

KW - “Obcshinno-vechevaia” civilization of Old Rus

KW - “October of 1917”

KW - “Submersion in the abyss”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120044260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c58ad10b-d243-3ca6-b144-e7387dbcb780/

U2 - 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.301

DO - 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2021.301

M3 - статья

VL - 66

SP - 677

EP - 698

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

SN - 1812-9323

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 88807866