Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review
ИНТЕРВЬЮ С Я. А. СЛИНИНЫМ (САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ, 12 СЕНТЯБРЯ 2013 Г.) (ИНТЕРВЬЮ ПОДГОТОВИЛИ НАТАЛЬЯ АРТЁМЕНКО И АНДРЕЙ ПАТКУЛЬ). / Patkul, Andrey; Natalia, Artemenko.
In: Horizon, Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014, p. 237-250.Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - ИНТЕРВЬЮ С Я. А. СЛИНИНЫМ (САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ, 12 СЕНТЯБРЯ 2013 Г.) (ИНТЕРВЬЮ ПОДГОТОВИЛИ НАТАЛЬЯ АРТЁМЕНКО И АНДРЕЙ ПАТКУЛЬ)
AU - Patkul, Andrey
AU - Natalia, Artemenko
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - This is the text of an interview given by professor of department of logic of the philosophical faculty St. Petersburg State University Yaroslav A. Slinin to Natalia Artemenko and Andrei Patkul. Prof. Slinin talks about the genesis of his philosophical views, in particular, about his way into phenomenology. His recollections of the phenomenological community in the former Leningrad is of very interest in the context of Soviet philosophy’s historiography. It ought to remarked that the course under the titled «Phenomenology and Logic» delivered by Prof. Slinin since 1970 brought to bear overwhelming influence on the shaping of today’s philosophical community in St. Petersburg. Hence, the problems of correlation between phenomenology and logic are discussed in this interview. Prof. Slinin points that the problematic of logic is the confluence point of phenomenology and analytical philosophy, which deal with the same problems but by different methods and in different attitudes. The main distinction points between these two philosophical trends are, on the one hand, that phenomenology has a metaphysical background, which is denied by representatives of classical analytical philosophy, and on the other hand, that phenomenologists as distinguished from analytical philosophers accept the intellectual intuition of essences. Prof. Slinin states with regard to correlation between phenomenology and contemporary cognitive sciences that the Husserl’s distinction of transcendental and natural attitudes is very important up to now. He gives his own interpretation of Husserl’s doctrine of reduction in this context. Prof. Slinin tries to show also that Heidegger describes by ontological terms the same phenomena which are described by Husserl in transcendental terms. As conclusion, Prof. Slinin talk about his other non-phenomenological interests in philosophy, namely, about ancient philosophy (particularly, in its connection with phenomenology), patristic, early modern and Russian philosophy.
AB - This is the text of an interview given by professor of department of logic of the philosophical faculty St. Petersburg State University Yaroslav A. Slinin to Natalia Artemenko and Andrei Patkul. Prof. Slinin talks about the genesis of his philosophical views, in particular, about his way into phenomenology. His recollections of the phenomenological community in the former Leningrad is of very interest in the context of Soviet philosophy’s historiography. It ought to remarked that the course under the titled «Phenomenology and Logic» delivered by Prof. Slinin since 1970 brought to bear overwhelming influence on the shaping of today’s philosophical community in St. Petersburg. Hence, the problems of correlation between phenomenology and logic are discussed in this interview. Prof. Slinin points that the problematic of logic is the confluence point of phenomenology and analytical philosophy, which deal with the same problems but by different methods and in different attitudes. The main distinction points between these two philosophical trends are, on the one hand, that phenomenology has a metaphysical background, which is denied by representatives of classical analytical philosophy, and on the other hand, that phenomenologists as distinguished from analytical philosophers accept the intellectual intuition of essences. Prof. Slinin states with regard to correlation between phenomenology and contemporary cognitive sciences that the Husserl’s distinction of transcendental and natural attitudes is very important up to now. He gives his own interpretation of Husserl’s doctrine of reduction in this context. Prof. Slinin tries to show also that Heidegger describes by ontological terms the same phenomena which are described by Husserl in transcendental terms. As conclusion, Prof. Slinin talk about his other non-phenomenological interests in philosophy, namely, about ancient philosophy (particularly, in its connection with phenomenology), patristic, early modern and Russian philosophy.
KW - Cognitive sciences
KW - Ethic
KW - Inter-subjectivity
KW - Logic
KW - Phenomenology
KW - Philosophy in USSR
KW - Reduction
KW - Theory of subjectivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036653770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - редакционная статья
AN - SCOPUS:85036653770
VL - 3
SP - 237
EP - 250
JO - Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania
JF - Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania
SN - 2226-5260
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 13725679