Standard

РЕЦЕНЗИЯ НА КНИГУ Л. А. ДЕ СУСА, А. ФАЛЬКАТО (РЕД.) PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND VALUES. / Сидоров, Алексей Михайлович.

In: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2022, p. 455-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{895142b57f6a420da91ff2f7c1fb3ff4,
title = "РЕЦЕНЗИЯ НА КНИГУ Л. А. ДЕ СУСА, А. ФАЛЬКАТО (РЕД.) PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND VALUES",
abstract = "The review is devoted to a joint monograph of Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity and Values published in 2019. The peculiarity and novelty of this monograph is that it is devoted not so much to the cognitive and epistemological aspects of phenomenology of intersubjectivity as to ethical, existential and value problems of relations with the Others, presented in various phenomenological concepts. One of the advantages of the work is the pluralistic approach, which allows the reader to get acquainted with the solutions to the problem of intersubjectivity posed by a number of the most prominent phenomenologists, i. e. Husserl, Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Marcel, Levinas and others. The book traces the idea that emerging of the topic of intersubjectivity in phenomenology caused a socio-ethical and axiological shift in the phenomenological movement. Considering moving of modern philosophy towards “the intersubjective paradigm” (W. H{\"o}sle), the aim of the authors of the monograph to show the relevance and innovation of phenomenology in discussing the problems of the Other, communication and ethics can be assessed as a promising theoretical project. Whereas critics of the phenomenological movement reproached “methodological solipsism” of phenomenology, which develops Cartesian-Kantian subjectivism, a serious analysis of the works of the most prominent representatives of the phenomenological tradition leads the authors of the monograph to the conclusion that a phenomenological subject is social in its essence. The review draws a conclusion that the joint monograph brings into sharp focus that phenomenology is in possession of deep and diverse ways of studying the common being of people and collectively shared values.",
keywords = "Heidegger, Husserl, Levinas, Sartre, Scheler, ethics, intersubjectivity, phenomenology, value, Heidegger, Husserl, Levinas, Sartre, Scheler, ethics, intersubjectivity, phenomenology, value",
author = "Сидоров, {Алексей Михайлович}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-455-465",
language = "русский",
volume = "11",
pages = "455--465",
journal = "Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania",
issn = "2226-5260",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - РЕЦЕНЗИЯ НА КНИГУ Л. А. ДЕ СУСА, А. ФАЛЬКАТО (РЕД.) PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO INTERSUBJECTIVITY AND VALUES

AU - Сидоров, Алексей Михайлович

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The review is devoted to a joint monograph of Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity and Values published in 2019. The peculiarity and novelty of this monograph is that it is devoted not so much to the cognitive and epistemological aspects of phenomenology of intersubjectivity as to ethical, existential and value problems of relations with the Others, presented in various phenomenological concepts. One of the advantages of the work is the pluralistic approach, which allows the reader to get acquainted with the solutions to the problem of intersubjectivity posed by a number of the most prominent phenomenologists, i. e. Husserl, Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Marcel, Levinas and others. The book traces the idea that emerging of the topic of intersubjectivity in phenomenology caused a socio-ethical and axiological shift in the phenomenological movement. Considering moving of modern philosophy towards “the intersubjective paradigm” (W. Hösle), the aim of the authors of the monograph to show the relevance and innovation of phenomenology in discussing the problems of the Other, communication and ethics can be assessed as a promising theoretical project. Whereas critics of the phenomenological movement reproached “methodological solipsism” of phenomenology, which develops Cartesian-Kantian subjectivism, a serious analysis of the works of the most prominent representatives of the phenomenological tradition leads the authors of the monograph to the conclusion that a phenomenological subject is social in its essence. The review draws a conclusion that the joint monograph brings into sharp focus that phenomenology is in possession of deep and diverse ways of studying the common being of people and collectively shared values.

AB - The review is devoted to a joint monograph of Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity and Values published in 2019. The peculiarity and novelty of this monograph is that it is devoted not so much to the cognitive and epistemological aspects of phenomenology of intersubjectivity as to ethical, existential and value problems of relations with the Others, presented in various phenomenological concepts. One of the advantages of the work is the pluralistic approach, which allows the reader to get acquainted with the solutions to the problem of intersubjectivity posed by a number of the most prominent phenomenologists, i. e. Husserl, Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Marcel, Levinas and others. The book traces the idea that emerging of the topic of intersubjectivity in phenomenology caused a socio-ethical and axiological shift in the phenomenological movement. Considering moving of modern philosophy towards “the intersubjective paradigm” (W. Hösle), the aim of the authors of the monograph to show the relevance and innovation of phenomenology in discussing the problems of the Other, communication and ethics can be assessed as a promising theoretical project. Whereas critics of the phenomenological movement reproached “methodological solipsism” of phenomenology, which develops Cartesian-Kantian subjectivism, a serious analysis of the works of the most prominent representatives of the phenomenological tradition leads the authors of the monograph to the conclusion that a phenomenological subject is social in its essence. The review draws a conclusion that the joint monograph brings into sharp focus that phenomenology is in possession of deep and diverse ways of studying the common being of people and collectively shared values.

KW - Heidegger

KW - Husserl

KW - Levinas

KW - Sartre

KW - Scheler

KW - ethics

KW - intersubjectivity

KW - phenomenology

KW - value

KW - Heidegger

KW - Husserl

KW - Levinas

KW - Sartre

KW - Scheler

KW - ethics

KW - intersubjectivity

KW - phenomenology

KW - value

UR - https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49241428

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134648898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/19b99969-c776-32fb-aff0-2e7b45459187/

U2 - 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-455-465

DO - 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-455-465

M3 - рецензия

VL - 11

SP - 455

EP - 465

JO - Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania

JF - Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania

SN - 2226-5260

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 97598766