Standard

Славянство и Запад в истории и культуре (к публикации «Исторических писем об отношениях русского народа к его соплеменникам» В.И. Ламанского). / Malinov, Aleksey Valeryevich; Naldoniova, Lenka; Kupriyanov, Victor Alexandrovich.

In: СОЛОВЬЕВСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ, Vol. 2022, No. 1, 30.03.2022, p. 116-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{52ad442d02c146df89f6ec99931970ba,
title = "Славянство и Запад в истории и культуре (к публикации «Исторических писем об отношениях русского народа к его соплеменникам» В.И. Ламанского)",
abstract = "The article serves as the introduction into the publication of the “Historical Letter” by V.I. Lamansky. The authors consider the context of V.I. Lamansky{\textquoteright}s discourse concerning the reciprocal relations between the Slavs and the Germans. Considering these relations as inimical, V.I. Lamansky substantiated this idea by references to the opinion of German scholars about the Slavs. He showed the malignancy of the German cultural and political influence on the Slavs, something which leads to the loss of their nationality, based on the example of Czech and, to some extent, Croatian history. It is not a coincidence that the essential part of the second “Historical Letter” is based on the material of the Hussite movement and Thirty Years{\textquoteright} War which caused the germanisation of the Czech people. Lamansky attached great importance to the Hussite movement, as he considered it one of the highest manifestations of the Slavic self-consciousness (or at least of the Western Slavs). Based on the letters of the scholar showing his attitude to the Czech people, F. Palacky and other leaders of the Czech Revival, the authors demonstrate that Lamansky had probably borrowed the notion of “the Greek-Slavic world” as against the German-Roman world from German historiological literature. Being an adherent of Slavophilism, Lamansky considerably contributed to it. Particularly, he tried to more definitely formulate Slavophile{\textquoteright}s attitude to the “Slavic question,” on which the attention of the founders of the movement had paid little attention. His interpretation of Slavic history was best realized in his master{\textquoteright}s thesis “On the Slavs in Middle Asia, Africa and Spain” (1859). The second “Historical Question” was likely written soon after finishing work on the thesis and was a step on the way to his other serious work, namely his doctoral thesis “On Historical Studies of the Greek-Slavic World in Europe” (1871), as both “Historical Letters” and the dissertation were written from similar historiographical positions.",
keywords = "Civilizational antagonism, Historiosophy, Language as a soft power, Nationality in science, Russian-Czech ties, Slavophilism, University philosophy",
author = "Malinov, {Aleksey Valeryevich} and Lenka Naldoniova and Kupriyanov, {Victor Alexandrovich}",
note = "Funding Information: Аннотация. Предваряется публикация второго «Исторического письма» В.И. Ламанского. Рас-сматривается контекст рассуждений В.И. Ламанского, посвященных взаимным отношениям сла-вян и германских народов, которые В.И. Ламанский оценивает как враждебные и в качестве под-тверждения приводит мнения немецких ученых о славянах и на примере истории Чехии и отча-сти Хорватии показывает пагубность для славян влияния германской культуры и политической системы, приводящего к утрате народности. Рассматривается позиция В.И. Ламанского, отра-женная во втором «Историческом письме», в отношении гуситского движения как проявления славянского самосознания. На основе писем ученого, в которых приводятся его мнения о чехах, Ф. Палацком и других деятелях чешского национального движения, показано, что концепт греко-славянского мира и его антагонистическое отношение к миру германо-романскому Ламанский заимствовал, скорее всего, из немецкой же историологической литературы. Анализируются сла-вянофильские взгляды Ламанского, существенно дополнившего и развившего учение славяно-филов, в частности, более определенно сформулировав отношение славянофилов к «славянскому вопросу», который мало занимал основателей этого движения. Рассматривается его интерпрета-ция славянской истории, нашедшая отражение в магистерской диссертации «О славянах в Малой Азии, в Африке и в Испании» (1859 г.). Второе «Историческое письмо», написанное вскоре по-сле завершения работы над диссертацией, рассматривается как опосредующая работа на пути к 1 Статья подготовлена в рамках проекта РФФИ (грант № 20-011-00071). (The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number № 20-011-00071). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, Ivanovo State Power Engineering University. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "30",
doi = "10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.116-137",
language = "русский",
volume = "2022",
pages = "116--137",
journal = "СОЛОВЬЕВСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ",
issn = "2076-9210",
publisher = "Ивановский государственный энергетический университет ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Славянство и Запад в истории и культуре (к публикации «Исторических писем об отношениях русского народа к его соплеменникам» В.И. Ламанского)

AU - Malinov, Aleksey Valeryevich

AU - Naldoniova, Lenka

AU - Kupriyanov, Victor Alexandrovich

N1 - Funding Information: Аннотация. Предваряется публикация второго «Исторического письма» В.И. Ламанского. Рас-сматривается контекст рассуждений В.И. Ламанского, посвященных взаимным отношениям сла-вян и германских народов, которые В.И. Ламанский оценивает как враждебные и в качестве под-тверждения приводит мнения немецких ученых о славянах и на примере истории Чехии и отча-сти Хорватии показывает пагубность для славян влияния германской культуры и политической системы, приводящего к утрате народности. Рассматривается позиция В.И. Ламанского, отра-женная во втором «Историческом письме», в отношении гуситского движения как проявления славянского самосознания. На основе писем ученого, в которых приводятся его мнения о чехах, Ф. Палацком и других деятелях чешского национального движения, показано, что концепт греко-славянского мира и его антагонистическое отношение к миру германо-романскому Ламанский заимствовал, скорее всего, из немецкой же историологической литературы. Анализируются сла-вянофильские взгляды Ламанского, существенно дополнившего и развившего учение славяно-филов, в частности, более определенно сформулировав отношение славянофилов к «славянскому вопросу», который мало занимал основателей этого движения. Рассматривается его интерпрета-ция славянской истории, нашедшая отражение в магистерской диссертации «О славянах в Малой Азии, в Африке и в Испании» (1859 г.). Второе «Историческое письмо», написанное вскоре по-сле завершения работы над диссертацией, рассматривается как опосредующая работа на пути к 1 Статья подготовлена в рамках проекта РФФИ (грант № 20-011-00071). (The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number № 20-011-00071). Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Ivanovo State Power Engineering University. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/3/30

Y1 - 2022/3/30

N2 - The article serves as the introduction into the publication of the “Historical Letter” by V.I. Lamansky. The authors consider the context of V.I. Lamansky’s discourse concerning the reciprocal relations between the Slavs and the Germans. Considering these relations as inimical, V.I. Lamansky substantiated this idea by references to the opinion of German scholars about the Slavs. He showed the malignancy of the German cultural and political influence on the Slavs, something which leads to the loss of their nationality, based on the example of Czech and, to some extent, Croatian history. It is not a coincidence that the essential part of the second “Historical Letter” is based on the material of the Hussite movement and Thirty Years’ War which caused the germanisation of the Czech people. Lamansky attached great importance to the Hussite movement, as he considered it one of the highest manifestations of the Slavic self-consciousness (or at least of the Western Slavs). Based on the letters of the scholar showing his attitude to the Czech people, F. Palacky and other leaders of the Czech Revival, the authors demonstrate that Lamansky had probably borrowed the notion of “the Greek-Slavic world” as against the German-Roman world from German historiological literature. Being an adherent of Slavophilism, Lamansky considerably contributed to it. Particularly, he tried to more definitely formulate Slavophile’s attitude to the “Slavic question,” on which the attention of the founders of the movement had paid little attention. His interpretation of Slavic history was best realized in his master’s thesis “On the Slavs in Middle Asia, Africa and Spain” (1859). The second “Historical Question” was likely written soon after finishing work on the thesis and was a step on the way to his other serious work, namely his doctoral thesis “On Historical Studies of the Greek-Slavic World in Europe” (1871), as both “Historical Letters” and the dissertation were written from similar historiographical positions.

AB - The article serves as the introduction into the publication of the “Historical Letter” by V.I. Lamansky. The authors consider the context of V.I. Lamansky’s discourse concerning the reciprocal relations between the Slavs and the Germans. Considering these relations as inimical, V.I. Lamansky substantiated this idea by references to the opinion of German scholars about the Slavs. He showed the malignancy of the German cultural and political influence on the Slavs, something which leads to the loss of their nationality, based on the example of Czech and, to some extent, Croatian history. It is not a coincidence that the essential part of the second “Historical Letter” is based on the material of the Hussite movement and Thirty Years’ War which caused the germanisation of the Czech people. Lamansky attached great importance to the Hussite movement, as he considered it one of the highest manifestations of the Slavic self-consciousness (or at least of the Western Slavs). Based on the letters of the scholar showing his attitude to the Czech people, F. Palacky and other leaders of the Czech Revival, the authors demonstrate that Lamansky had probably borrowed the notion of “the Greek-Slavic world” as against the German-Roman world from German historiological literature. Being an adherent of Slavophilism, Lamansky considerably contributed to it. Particularly, he tried to more definitely formulate Slavophile’s attitude to the “Slavic question,” on which the attention of the founders of the movement had paid little attention. His interpretation of Slavic history was best realized in his master’s thesis “On the Slavs in Middle Asia, Africa and Spain” (1859). The second “Historical Question” was likely written soon after finishing work on the thesis and was a step on the way to his other serious work, namely his doctoral thesis “On Historical Studies of the Greek-Slavic World in Europe” (1871), as both “Historical Letters” and the dissertation were written from similar historiographical positions.

KW - Civilizational antagonism

KW - Historiosophy

KW - Language as a soft power

KW - Nationality in science

KW - Russian-Czech ties

KW - Slavophilism

KW - University philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128974794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/55691938-f566-3240-b3b5-07531de88cbd/

U2 - 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.116-137

DO - 10.17588/2076-9210.2022.1.116-137

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85128974794

VL - 2022

SP - 116

EP - 137

JO - СОЛОВЬЕВСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ

JF - СОЛОВЬЕВСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ

SN - 2076-9210

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 95041336