The article is devoted to commenting on the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which addresses a number of significant problems of arbitration practice. In particular, the author sees the use of the category legality to refuse to enforce the award as controversial. The reference to the validity of the award as an element of public order is no less controversial. The approaches of the Supreme Court to the arbitration decision on the basis of re-evaluation of the circumstances of the case are also contradictory.

Translated title of the contributionTHE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY, PUBLIC ORDER, RE-EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE AND REVIEW OF THE AWARD. IN ONE JUDICIAL ACT
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)116-119
JournalТРЕТЕЙСКИЙ СУД
Issue number3/4 (119/120)
StatePublished - 2019

ID: 50885092