КТО ТОТ, КТО ИСПОЛЬЗУЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИЙ ЯЗЫК? (К статье А. В. Кравченко «ЯЗЫК И ПРИРОДА ЧЕЛОВЕЧНОСТИ»)

Standard

КТО ТОТ, КТО ИСПОЛЬЗУЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИЙ ЯЗЫК? (К статье А. В. Кравченко «ЯЗЫК И ПРИРОДА ЧЕЛОВЕЧНОСТИ»). / Chebanov, S. V.

In: Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2022, p. 25-44.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{4c85dbf59e984efd870ee9fa9fe10041,

title = "КТО ТОТ, КТО ИСПОЛЬЗУЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИЙ ЯЗЫК? (К статье А. В. Кравченко «ЯЗЫК И ПРИРОДА ЧЕЛОВЕЧНОСТИ»)",

abstract = "The article is devoted to the polemic with Alexander Kravchenko regarding his thesis that the way out of the protracted crisis in linguistics is to use a systemic approach to linguistic semiosis as biological adaptation. The author argues that linguistics is not in a state of crisis but rather in a state of stagnation. Overcoming it presupposes an intensive methodological search that infinitely expands the horizons of permissible views rather than the use of a system approach that is inadequate to the task. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the marginal manifestations of language as fully as possible to obtain truly universal results, which is impossible without clarifying the nature of man as the user of language. Human nature is in a very complex relationship with human biology in its anthropological understanding and the biology of Homo sapiens as an object of zoology as one of its components. The doctrines of different epochs and schools of thought, from the Book of the Prophet Ezra through Thomas Aquinas, from Palamas to Austin, from Searle to Shchedrovitsky and Father Georgy Kochetkov, are examples of works claiming to solve this problem",

keywords = "Holism, Human biology, Human nature, Language, Methodology of linguistics, Modes of reality, Synthesis, Holism, Human biology, Human nature, Language, Methodology of linguistics, Modes of reality, Synthesis",

author = "Chebanov, {S. V.}",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.5922/2225-5346-2022-3-2",

language = "русский",

volume = "13",

pages = "25--44",

journal = "Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent",

issn = "2225-5346",

publisher = "Издательство Балтийского федерального университета им. И. Канта",

number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - КТО ТОТ, КТО ИСПОЛЬЗУЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИЙ ЯЗЫК? (К статье А. В. Кравченко «ЯЗЫК И ПРИРОДА ЧЕЛОВЕЧНОСТИ»)

AU - Chebanov, S. V.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The article is devoted to the polemic with Alexander Kravchenko regarding his thesis that the way out of the protracted crisis in linguistics is to use a systemic approach to linguistic semiosis as biological adaptation. The author argues that linguistics is not in a state of crisis but rather in a state of stagnation. Overcoming it presupposes an intensive methodological search that infinitely expands the horizons of permissible views rather than the use of a system approach that is inadequate to the task. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the marginal manifestations of language as fully as possible to obtain truly universal results, which is impossible without clarifying the nature of man as the user of language. Human nature is in a very complex relationship with human biology in its anthropological understanding and the biology of Homo sapiens as an object of zoology as one of its components. The doctrines of different epochs and schools of thought, from the Book of the Prophet Ezra through Thomas Aquinas, from Palamas to Austin, from Searle to Shchedrovitsky and Father Georgy Kochetkov, are examples of works claiming to solve this problem

AB - The article is devoted to the polemic with Alexander Kravchenko regarding his thesis that the way out of the protracted crisis in linguistics is to use a systemic approach to linguistic semiosis as biological adaptation. The author argues that linguistics is not in a state of crisis but rather in a state of stagnation. Overcoming it presupposes an intensive methodological search that infinitely expands the horizons of permissible views rather than the use of a system approach that is inadequate to the task. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the marginal manifestations of language as fully as possible to obtain truly universal results, which is impossible without clarifying the nature of man as the user of language. Human nature is in a very complex relationship with human biology in its anthropological understanding and the biology of Homo sapiens as an object of zoology as one of its components. The doctrines of different epochs and schools of thought, from the Book of the Prophet Ezra through Thomas Aquinas, from Palamas to Austin, from Searle to Shchedrovitsky and Father Georgy Kochetkov, are examples of works claiming to solve this problem

KW - Holism

KW - Human biology

KW - Human nature

KW - Language

KW - Methodology of linguistics

KW - Modes of reality

KW - Synthesis

KW - Holism

KW - Human biology

KW - Human nature

KW - Language

KW - Methodology of linguistics

KW - Modes of reality

KW - Synthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135865805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/b9659744-be15-34ce-8238-402f8d4739fc/

U2 - 10.5922/2225-5346-2022-3-2

DO - 10.5922/2225-5346-2022-3-2

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85135865805

VL - 13

SP - 25

EP - 44

JO - Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent

JF - Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent

SN - 2225-5346

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 99331411