Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
«Европеизм» между политикой и культурой: исторические смыслы и современные трансформации (материалы «круглого стола»). / Pruzhinin, B.I.; Kantor, V.K.; Kasavina, N.A.; Kiyashchenko, L.P.; Kozyrev, A.P.; Konacheva, S.A.; Mezhuev, B.V.; Mikhailov, I.A.; Mochalova, I.N.; Porus, V.N.; Pskhu, R.V.; Rozin, V.M.; Serebriany, S.D.; Baichun, Z.; Chumakov, A.N.; Shchedrina, T.G.
In: ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ, Vol. 2024, No. 9, 01.09.2024, p. 24-77.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - «Европеизм» между политикой и культурой: исторические смыслы и современные трансформации (материалы «круглого стола»)
AU - Pruzhinin, B.I.
AU - Kantor, V.K.
AU - Kasavina, N.A.
AU - Kiyashchenko, L.P.
AU - Kozyrev, A.P.
AU - Konacheva, S.A.
AU - Mezhuev, B.V.
AU - Mikhailov, I.A.
AU - Mochalova, I.N.
AU - Porus, V.N.
AU - Pskhu, R.V.
AU - Rozin, V.M.
AU - Serebriany, S.D.
AU - Baichun, Z.
AU - Chumakov, A.N.
AU - Shchedrina, T.G.
N1 - Export Date: 21 October 2024
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - The journal “Voprosy Filosofii” has repeatedly addressed various aspects of the philosophy of culture. In particular, issues of the interaction between Russia, the West, and the East, the unity of the world and the diversity of cultures, multiculturalism and the dialogue of cultures, the role of the philosopher in culture, and the prospects for the development of Russian culture have been discussed. Special importance has been given to the understanding of cultural studies as a scientific and educational discipline. In April 2024, we once again turned to the philosophy of culture in the context of the problem of “Europeanism” and discussed the historical meanings and contemporary transformations of this cultural-historical phenomenon. The following questions were proposed for discussion. What constitutes the “essence” of European culture? Does “Europeanism” have an obligatory historical and geographical attachment? Why does the methodological concept of “presentism-antiquarianism” gain crucial importance today, particularly for research in the field of the philosophy of culture? Is antiquity the origin only of European culture, or is it the origin of the Great Culture? Is “Europeanization of the Earth” possible today? (Spengler, Husserl, Heidegger). Who are the true heirs of antiquity today? Are there differences between Greek and Roman cultures? Which type has Europe inherited today, and to what extent? Has the perception of “Europeanism” changed in Russian and world philosophy of the 19th–21st centuries? The role of Hegel in the mythologization of “Europe.” Is “Europeanism” a political myth of the 21st century? How do you evaluate the attempts at philosophical comparisons of the crisis of European culture in the 1920s and the 2020s? Does “Europeanism” exhaust European culture? And what philosophical or cultural problem do we want to see behind this? The crucial topic of discussion was the interpretation of Europeanism as a symbolic construct, connected with the assessment of the prospects for the development of the cultural future of Russia, Europe, and Humanity. © 2024, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
AB - The journal “Voprosy Filosofii” has repeatedly addressed various aspects of the philosophy of culture. In particular, issues of the interaction between Russia, the West, and the East, the unity of the world and the diversity of cultures, multiculturalism and the dialogue of cultures, the role of the philosopher in culture, and the prospects for the development of Russian culture have been discussed. Special importance has been given to the understanding of cultural studies as a scientific and educational discipline. In April 2024, we once again turned to the philosophy of culture in the context of the problem of “Europeanism” and discussed the historical meanings and contemporary transformations of this cultural-historical phenomenon. The following questions were proposed for discussion. What constitutes the “essence” of European culture? Does “Europeanism” have an obligatory historical and geographical attachment? Why does the methodological concept of “presentism-antiquarianism” gain crucial importance today, particularly for research in the field of the philosophy of culture? Is antiquity the origin only of European culture, or is it the origin of the Great Culture? Is “Europeanization of the Earth” possible today? (Spengler, Husserl, Heidegger). Who are the true heirs of antiquity today? Are there differences between Greek and Roman cultures? Which type has Europe inherited today, and to what extent? Has the perception of “Europeanism” changed in Russian and world philosophy of the 19th–21st centuries? The role of Hegel in the mythologization of “Europe.” Is “Europeanism” a political myth of the 21st century? How do you evaluate the attempts at philosophical comparisons of the crisis of European culture in the 1920s and the 2020s? Does “Europeanism” exhaust European culture? And what philosophical or cultural problem do we want to see behind this? The crucial topic of discussion was the interpretation of Europeanism as a symbolic construct, connected with the assessment of the prospects for the development of the cultural future of Russia, Europe, and Humanity. © 2024, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
KW - ancient culture
KW - European culture
KW - Europeanism
KW - history of Russian philosophy
KW - philosophy of culture
KW - European culture
KW - Europeanism
KW - ancient culture
KW - history of Russian philosophy
KW - philosophy of culture
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a2d688a8-6955-34c8-a8a7-46142ce91e2b/
U2 - 10.21146/0042-8744-2024-9-24-77
DO - 10.21146/0042-8744-2024-9-24-77
M3 - статья
VL - 2024
SP - 24
EP - 77
JO - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ
JF - ВОПРОСЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ
SN - 0042-8744
IS - 9
ER -
ID: 126221461