TY - JOUR

T1 - Городские режимы и общественно значимые проекты трансформации городской среды в Российской Федерации

AU - Аксенов, Константин Эдуардович

AU - Галустов, Кирилл Артёмович

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The authors of the article aim to identify the principles and patterns of mutual influence of socially significant projects of transformation of the urban environment and urban regimes in the Russian Federation. Clarence Stone's concept of urban regimes is used as a theoretical framework. Based on the author's system of criteria of social significance, 6 projects of urban environment transformation in 4 cities were selected and analyzed: Oklita Center and Fuchkov Buyan in St. Petersburg, Zaiyadye Park and the development of fields of the Fimiryazev Academy in Moscow, St. Catherine's Church in Yekaterinburg and concreting of the embankments of the river Vologda in Vologda. If the initial phase of all projects took place in the realities of local urban growth regimes, with the predominance of the interests of the established coalitions of business and government, then the subsequent increase in the role of public activism in all projects and the change of goal-setting under its influence led to a change in the local urban regime during their implementation. It is shown that in five studied cases, during the implementation of projects, there was a transition of local urban regimes from "growth" to "progressive", and in one - from "growth" to a greater extent towards the "status quo" regime. The general principles and patterns of mutual influence of socially significant transformation projects and urban regimes in the Russian Federation are identified and described: competitive public interaction of all types of actors; change or relocation of the project as a spatial way of conflict resolution; the prevailing shift from the realization of the interests of government and business in favor of society; involvement of paternalistic tools as a way to achieve consensus. Such conditions of mutual influence of socially significant projects and urban regimes can develop in a certain period in any major Russian city, then we can expect in it similar to the described results of space transformation. The results of the study clearly demonstrate the beginning of the process of local transformation of the dominant urban regimes in the Russian Federation.

AB - The authors of the article aim to identify the principles and patterns of mutual influence of socially significant projects of transformation of the urban environment and urban regimes in the Russian Federation. Clarence Stone's concept of urban regimes is used as a theoretical framework. Based on the author's system of criteria of social significance, 6 projects of urban environment transformation in 4 cities were selected and analyzed: Oklita Center and Fuchkov Buyan in St. Petersburg, Zaiyadye Park and the development of fields of the Fimiryazev Academy in Moscow, St. Catherine's Church in Yekaterinburg and concreting of the embankments of the river Vologda in Vologda. If the initial phase of all projects took place in the realities of local urban growth regimes, with the predominance of the interests of the established coalitions of business and government, then the subsequent increase in the role of public activism in all projects and the change of goal-setting under its influence led to a change in the local urban regime during their implementation. It is shown that in five studied cases, during the implementation of projects, there was a transition of local urban regimes from "growth" to "progressive", and in one - from "growth" to a greater extent towards the "status quo" regime. The general principles and patterns of mutual influence of socially significant transformation projects and urban regimes in the Russian Federation are identified and described: competitive public interaction of all types of actors; change or relocation of the project as a spatial way of conflict resolution; the prevailing shift from the realization of the interests of government and business in favor of society; involvement of paternalistic tools as a way to achieve consensus. Such conditions of mutual influence of socially significant projects and urban regimes can develop in a certain period in any major Russian city, then we can expect in it similar to the described results of space transformation. The results of the study clearly demonstrate the beginning of the process of local transformation of the dominant urban regimes in the Russian Federation.

KW - socially significant projects

KW - transformation of the urban environment

KW - urban political regimes

KW - urban regimes

KW - use of urban space

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f03a0a1f-306b-3ef4-985e-e312c9768540/

U2 - 10.21638/spbu07.2023.101

DO - 10.21638/spbu07.2023.101

M3 - статья

VL - 68

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Науки о Земле

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Науки о Земле

SN - 1812-9323

IS - 1

ER -