The right not to testify against oneself is one of the basic constitutional rights in the Russian legal order, but the mechanism for the operation of this right in civil and arbitration proceedings remains unspecified today. The actual situation leads to the fact that any attempts to demand evidence from a procedural opponent may be blocked. The author analyzes the provisions of Anglo-Saxon law, where the privilege against self-incrimination arose, and concludes that the Russian legislator incorrectly reciprocated this institution, giving it a broader interpretation.
Translated title of the contributionDOES THE RIGHT NOT TO TESTIFY AGAINST ONESELF IN CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS APPLY?
Original languageRussian
Title of host publicationСмыслы, ценности, нормы в бытии человека, общества, государства
Subtitle of host publicationСборник статей и материалов
Place of PublicationЧелябинск
PublisherЮжно-Уральский государственный институт искусств им. П.И. Чайковского
Pages277-282
ISBN (Print)978-5-94934-097-4
StatePublished - 2022

    Research areas

  • civil procedure, THE CONSTI-TUTION, THE RIGHT NOT TO TESTIFY AGAINST ONESELF, DEMANDING EVIDENCE, MEETING THE BURDEN OF PROOF

ID: 96223059