Standard

Оксобораты группы людвигита: природные и минералоподобные соединения как перспективные материалы. / Бирюков, Ярослав Павлович; Зинатуллин, Алмаз; Бубнова, Римма Сергеевна; Вагизов , Фарит; Шаблинский, Андрей Павлович; Филатов, Станислав Константинович; Пеков, Игорь Викторович.

In: Lithosphere (Russian Federation), Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.05.2024, p. 226-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Бирюков, ЯП, Зинатуллин, А, Бубнова, РС, Вагизов , Ф, Шаблинский, АП, Филатов, СК & Пеков, ИВ 2024, 'Оксобораты группы людвигита: природные и минералоподобные соединения как перспективные материалы', Lithosphere (Russian Federation), vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 226-239. https://doi.org/10.24930/1681-9004-2024-24-2-226-239

APA

Vancouver

Author

Бирюков, Ярослав Павлович ; Зинатуллин, Алмаз ; Бубнова, Римма Сергеевна ; Вагизов , Фарит ; Шаблинский, Андрей Павлович ; Филатов, Станислав Константинович ; Пеков, Игорь Викторович. / Оксобораты группы людвигита: природные и минералоподобные соединения как перспективные материалы. In: Lithosphere (Russian Federation). 2024 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 226-239.

BibTeX

@article{a08fdcd1faa34df285c13619bd2abb25,
title = "Оксобораты группы людвигита: природные и минералоподобные соединения как перспективные материалы",
abstract = "Natural oxoborates of the ludwigite group, including azoproite, ludwigite, and vonsenite. Their empirical formulas based on five oxygen atoms have the following form: azoproite (Formula Presented), ludwigite (Formula Presented) and vonsenite (Formula Presented). Aim. To establish the relationship between the composition, crystal structure, and thermal behavior (293–1373 K) of the minerals. Materials and methods. Ludwigite was collected at the Iten{\textquoteright}yurginskoe tin skarn deposit; vonsenite was collected at the Titovskoe magnesium-skarn boron deposit; azoproite was collected at magnesian skarns of the Tazheran alkaline massif. The methods of single crystal X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, high-temperature X-ray diffraction, M{\"o}ssbauer spectroscopy, and thermal analysis were used. Results. Low-charge cations (Fe2+, Fe2.5+, Mg2+) tend to occupy the M(1)–M(3) sites, and high-charge cations (Fe3+, Al3+, Ti4+, Sn4+) generally occupy the M(4) site. Azoproite is characterized by the highest melting temperature Tm > 1650 K. Due to the low Fe2+ content, azoproite does not undergo solid-phase decomposition across the investigated temperature range. The melting point of ludwigite exceeds 1582 K, which is due to the high Mg content; as a result of the Fe2+ → → Fe3+ oxidation, it gradually decomposes with the formation of hematite, warwickite, and magnetite. The temperatures of oxidation and solid-phase decomposition in the Fe2+-rich vonsenite are approximately 100 K lower than those in ludwigite. The melting point of vonsenite is 1571 K. All the minerals are characterized by a weak degree of thermal expansion anisotropy. The main contribution to the thermal expansion anisotropy is due to the preferred orientation of the [BO3]3– triangles. Conclusions. The thermal properties of the oxoborates depend on their chemical composition. It was established that Tm increases with an increase in the Mg and Ti4+ content, and decreases with an increase in the Fe2+ content. The Fe2+ → → Fe3+ oxidation is observed when the FeO component in the minerals exceeds 10 wt %, which leads to the solid-phase decomposition starting at temperatures of about 500–600 K. The values of the293KαV volume thermal expansion of ludwigite and azoproite are comparable, while the largest values were observed for vonsenite. This is associated with the largest average bond lengths, primarily those of 6.",
keywords = "iron oxidation, ludwigite, oxoborates, thermal expansion, thermal properties",
author = "Бирюков, {Ярослав Павлович} and Алмаз Зинатуллин and Бубнова, {Римма Сергеевна} and Фарит Вагизов and Шаблинский, {Андрей Павлович} and Филатов, {Станислав Константинович} and Пеков, {Игорь Викторович}",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "3",
doi = "10.24930/1681-9004-2024-24-2-226-239",
language = "русский",
volume = "24",
pages = "226--239",
journal = "Lithosphere (Russian Federation)",
issn = "1681-9004",
publisher = "Институт геологии и геохимии им. академика А.Н. Заварицкого",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Оксобораты группы людвигита: природные и минералоподобные соединения как перспективные материалы

AU - Бирюков, Ярослав Павлович

AU - Зинатуллин, Алмаз

AU - Бубнова, Римма Сергеевна

AU - Вагизов , Фарит

AU - Шаблинский, Андрей Павлович

AU - Филатов, Станислав Константинович

AU - Пеков, Игорь Викторович

PY - 2024/5/3

Y1 - 2024/5/3

N2 - Natural oxoborates of the ludwigite group, including azoproite, ludwigite, and vonsenite. Their empirical formulas based on five oxygen atoms have the following form: azoproite (Formula Presented), ludwigite (Formula Presented) and vonsenite (Formula Presented). Aim. To establish the relationship between the composition, crystal structure, and thermal behavior (293–1373 K) of the minerals. Materials and methods. Ludwigite was collected at the Iten’yurginskoe tin skarn deposit; vonsenite was collected at the Titovskoe magnesium-skarn boron deposit; azoproite was collected at magnesian skarns of the Tazheran alkaline massif. The methods of single crystal X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, high-temperature X-ray diffraction, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and thermal analysis were used. Results. Low-charge cations (Fe2+, Fe2.5+, Mg2+) tend to occupy the M(1)–M(3) sites, and high-charge cations (Fe3+, Al3+, Ti4+, Sn4+) generally occupy the M(4) site. Azoproite is characterized by the highest melting temperature Tm > 1650 K. Due to the low Fe2+ content, azoproite does not undergo solid-phase decomposition across the investigated temperature range. The melting point of ludwigite exceeds 1582 K, which is due to the high Mg content; as a result of the Fe2+ → → Fe3+ oxidation, it gradually decomposes with the formation of hematite, warwickite, and magnetite. The temperatures of oxidation and solid-phase decomposition in the Fe2+-rich vonsenite are approximately 100 K lower than those in ludwigite. The melting point of vonsenite is 1571 K. All the minerals are characterized by a weak degree of thermal expansion anisotropy. The main contribution to the thermal expansion anisotropy is due to the preferred orientation of the [BO3]3– triangles. Conclusions. The thermal properties of the oxoborates depend on their chemical composition. It was established that Tm increases with an increase in the Mg and Ti4+ content, and decreases with an increase in the Fe2+ content. The Fe2+ → → Fe3+ oxidation is observed when the FeO component in the minerals exceeds 10 wt %, which leads to the solid-phase decomposition starting at temperatures of about 500–600 K. The values of the293KαV volume thermal expansion of ludwigite and azoproite are comparable, while the largest values were observed for vonsenite. This is associated with the largest average bond lengths, primarily those of 6.

AB - Natural oxoborates of the ludwigite group, including azoproite, ludwigite, and vonsenite. Their empirical formulas based on five oxygen atoms have the following form: azoproite (Formula Presented), ludwigite (Formula Presented) and vonsenite (Formula Presented). Aim. To establish the relationship between the composition, crystal structure, and thermal behavior (293–1373 K) of the minerals. Materials and methods. Ludwigite was collected at the Iten’yurginskoe tin skarn deposit; vonsenite was collected at the Titovskoe magnesium-skarn boron deposit; azoproite was collected at magnesian skarns of the Tazheran alkaline massif. The methods of single crystal X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, high-temperature X-ray diffraction, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and thermal analysis were used. Results. Low-charge cations (Fe2+, Fe2.5+, Mg2+) tend to occupy the M(1)–M(3) sites, and high-charge cations (Fe3+, Al3+, Ti4+, Sn4+) generally occupy the M(4) site. Azoproite is characterized by the highest melting temperature Tm > 1650 K. Due to the low Fe2+ content, azoproite does not undergo solid-phase decomposition across the investigated temperature range. The melting point of ludwigite exceeds 1582 K, which is due to the high Mg content; as a result of the Fe2+ → → Fe3+ oxidation, it gradually decomposes with the formation of hematite, warwickite, and magnetite. The temperatures of oxidation and solid-phase decomposition in the Fe2+-rich vonsenite are approximately 100 K lower than those in ludwigite. The melting point of vonsenite is 1571 K. All the minerals are characterized by a weak degree of thermal expansion anisotropy. The main contribution to the thermal expansion anisotropy is due to the preferred orientation of the [BO3]3– triangles. Conclusions. The thermal properties of the oxoborates depend on their chemical composition. It was established that Tm increases with an increase in the Mg and Ti4+ content, and decreases with an increase in the Fe2+ content. The Fe2+ → → Fe3+ oxidation is observed when the FeO component in the minerals exceeds 10 wt %, which leads to the solid-phase decomposition starting at temperatures of about 500–600 K. The values of the293KαV volume thermal expansion of ludwigite and azoproite are comparable, while the largest values were observed for vonsenite. This is associated with the largest average bond lengths, primarily those of 6.

KW - iron oxidation

KW - ludwigite

KW - oxoborates

KW - thermal expansion

KW - thermal properties

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d9e557c3-c733-3d64-860c-0624adbaec39/

U2 - 10.24930/1681-9004-2024-24-2-226-239

DO - 10.24930/1681-9004-2024-24-2-226-239

M3 - статья

VL - 24

SP - 226

EP - 239

JO - Lithosphere (Russian Federation)

JF - Lithosphere (Russian Federation)

SN - 1681-9004

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 127773804