This article discusses the prominent issues of PPTs, such
as taste, fun etc. The main point in the article related to the discussion
between contextualism and realativism, taking into account earlier
researchers. Modern logician and linglinguists notice the puzzle about
faultless disagreement, which is about two contradiction propositions in
dialogue, which contain the PPTs. It is shown that relativists, who based
on the classical theories of reference, propose to expand the number
of parameters. In contrast to them, contextualists pay attention to the
speaker’s point of view. We intuitively assert, that we have to consider
the link between perception of the person and proposition, which he use.
It is proposed to explore the requiring of first-hand experience in PPTs