Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Опыт, опыт-предел и проблема «духовности» у Мишеля Фуко*. / Korotkov, D. M.; Tsypina, L. V.
In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, Vol. 37, No. 1, 31.03.2021, p. 64-76.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Опыт, опыт-предел и проблема «духовности» у Мишеля Фуко*
AU - Korotkov, D. M.
AU - Tsypina, L. V.
N1 - Funding Information: * The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-011-00826 ?The politicization and depoliticization of philosophy in the context of biopolitics: a comparative analysis of polemic discourses?. Publisher Copyright: © Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, 2021
PY - 2021/3/31
Y1 - 2021/3/31
N2 - The article is devoted to the historical and philosophical reconstruction of the concepts of experience and limit experience in the context of the problem of spirituality in Michel Foucault’s philosophy. The authors proceed from the thesis that in the postmodern space the concept of philosophical experience dramatically changes its traditional meaning. Turning to liminal philosophy, associated with the figures of Georges Bataille and Maurice Blanchot, the authors includes Foucault in this series in connection with the transformation of the concept of spirituality in the course of the intellectual evolution of the French thinker. In Foucault’s legacy, it is possible to distinguish several meanings of “experience”, each connected with a special type of “spirituality”, atheistic during the formation of Foucault’s philosophical position, political during its heyday and aesthetic during its decline. Regardless of these qualitative differences, spirituality in Foucault’s project remains an unattainable goal. The authors associate this feature of the Foucauldian interpretation of spirituality with the experience of desubjectivization. The “limit-experience” is understood by Foucault in two ways: how to set boundaries and how to overcome them. It is necessarily preceded by the experience of assembling the subject by the field of one or another truth. Between these two types of experience, Foucault places “experience-correlation”, which connects areas of knowledge, types of normativity, and forms of subjectivity. If “limit-experience” is established in the process of fleeing from the chaos of everyday life, then the “experience-correlation”, examined from the standpoint of Foucault’s archeology and genealogy, forces one to unravel the subject’s historical structures. Thanks to the practices of changing, dispersing, and splitting the subject, everyday life acquires once-lost meanings. However, spirituality remains an unattainable excess provoking a person to experience in which he himself will inevitably be absent.
AB - The article is devoted to the historical and philosophical reconstruction of the concepts of experience and limit experience in the context of the problem of spirituality in Michel Foucault’s philosophy. The authors proceed from the thesis that in the postmodern space the concept of philosophical experience dramatically changes its traditional meaning. Turning to liminal philosophy, associated with the figures of Georges Bataille and Maurice Blanchot, the authors includes Foucault in this series in connection with the transformation of the concept of spirituality in the course of the intellectual evolution of the French thinker. In Foucault’s legacy, it is possible to distinguish several meanings of “experience”, each connected with a special type of “spirituality”, atheistic during the formation of Foucault’s philosophical position, political during its heyday and aesthetic during its decline. Regardless of these qualitative differences, spirituality in Foucault’s project remains an unattainable goal. The authors associate this feature of the Foucauldian interpretation of spirituality with the experience of desubjectivization. The “limit-experience” is understood by Foucault in two ways: how to set boundaries and how to overcome them. It is necessarily preceded by the experience of assembling the subject by the field of one or another truth. Between these two types of experience, Foucault places “experience-correlation”, which connects areas of knowledge, types of normativity, and forms of subjectivity. If “limit-experience” is established in the process of fleeing from the chaos of everyday life, then the “experience-correlation”, examined from the standpoint of Foucault’s archeology and genealogy, forces one to unravel the subject’s historical structures. Thanks to the practices of changing, dispersing, and splitting the subject, everyday life acquires once-lost meanings. However, spirituality remains an unattainable excess provoking a person to experience in which he himself will inevitably be absent.
KW - Bataille
KW - Blanchot
KW - Desubjectivation
KW - Experience
KW - Foucault
KW - History
KW - Liminal philosophy
KW - Limit-experience
KW - Spirituality
KW - Subject
KW - Bataille
KW - Blanchot
KW - Foucault
KW - desubjectivation
KW - experience
KW - history
KW - liminal philosophy
KW - limit-experience
KW - spirituality
KW - subject
KW - Spirituality
KW - Desubjectivation
KW - History
KW - Limit-experience
KW - Subject
KW - Experience
KW - Liminal philosophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114594800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0358b2d3-5233-3f15-8e51-2863c07ebbaf/
U2 - 10.21638/spbu17.2021.106
DO - 10.21638/spbu17.2021.106
M3 - статья
AN - SCOPUS:85114594800
VL - 37
SP - 64
EP - 76
JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология
JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология
SN - 2542-2278
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 89745869