TY - JOUR

T1 - Конструирование арктической идентичности Китая в условиях глобальной турбулентности

AU - Лексютина, Яна Валерьевна

PY - 2025/10/1

Y1 - 2025/10/1

N2 - The current Arctic governance draws a clear distinction between Arctic and non-Arctic countries, which limits China’s participation in it. To overcome this limitation, Beijing has been making efforts to construct its identity in Arctic affairs and develop a new philosophy of Arctic governance that will provide non-Arctic states with greater opportunities to participate in Arctic affairs. This article is one of the first study in Russian scientific literature on the process of China’s conceptualization of its identity in Arctic affairs. The purpose of this article, written within the framework of a constructivist approach, is to identify the features of China’s self-positioning in Arctic affairs at each stage of the conceptualization of its Arctic identity. The main method used is a qualitative discursive analysis of Chinese research literature from 2022–2025, taking into account the peculiarities of the current geopolitical situation in the Arctic and revealing the evolution of foreign policy rhetoric and conceptualization of China’s Arctic identity. The article presents China’s identity as having gone through three stages: "non-Arctic country", "near-Arctic country", "stakeholder in Arctic affairs". It is concluded that China’s current Arctic identity should be considered ideologically as a three-tier system combining the philosophy of the concept of "community with a common destiny for mankind", "responsible great power" and "stakeholder in Arctic affairs". In addition to those that are widely used in Chinese official documents, the article also analyzes concepts that are still circulating at the expert level – "community with a common Arctic destiny" and "Global Arctic". It also summarizes Chinese assessments of the impact of the new geopolitical situation on the formation of China’s Arctic identity. It is concluded that China’s work on theoretical justification of increasing China’s role in Arctic governance up to its acquisition of status and rights equal to the Arctic countries will be continued.

AB - The current Arctic governance draws a clear distinction between Arctic and non-Arctic countries, which limits China’s participation in it. To overcome this limitation, Beijing has been making efforts to construct its identity in Arctic affairs and develop a new philosophy of Arctic governance that will provide non-Arctic states with greater opportunities to participate in Arctic affairs. This article is one of the first study in Russian scientific literature on the process of China’s conceptualization of its identity in Arctic affairs. The purpose of this article, written within the framework of a constructivist approach, is to identify the features of China’s self-positioning in Arctic affairs at each stage of the conceptualization of its Arctic identity. The main method used is a qualitative discursive analysis of Chinese research literature from 2022–2025, taking into account the peculiarities of the current geopolitical situation in the Arctic and revealing the evolution of foreign policy rhetoric and conceptualization of China’s Arctic identity. The article presents China’s identity as having gone through three stages: "non-Arctic country", "near-Arctic country", "stakeholder in Arctic affairs". It is concluded that China’s current Arctic identity should be considered ideologically as a three-tier system combining the philosophy of the concept of "community with a common destiny for mankind", "responsible great power" and "stakeholder in Arctic affairs". In addition to those that are widely used in Chinese official documents, the article also analyzes concepts that are still circulating at the expert level – "community with a common Arctic destiny" and "Global Arctic". It also summarizes Chinese assessments of the impact of the new geopolitical situation on the formation of China’s Arctic identity. It is concluded that China’s work on theoretical justification of increasing China’s role in Arctic governance up to its acquisition of status and rights equal to the Arctic countries will be continued.

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d239e648-4b7b-3935-9a16-fe9c6c99e781/

U2 - 10.63973/1998-6785/2025-3/169-178

DO - 10.63973/1998-6785/2025-3/169-178

M3 - статья

VL - 19

SP - 169

EP - 178

JO - Ojkumena Regional Researches

JF - Ojkumena Regional Researches

SN - 1998-6785

IS - 3

ER -