DOI

This paper focuses on the concept of the scientific-technical revolution. This concept is relevant today most of all in the context of historiographic studies of the Soviet period or the reflection of contemporary technological transformation from the Marxist position. The article demonstrates its relevance in the context of important contemporary issues. For a conceptual framework, the author uses the works on the social history of science by J. D. Bernal, the contemporary studies of science, technology and society, and the critical theory of technology, which seeks to integrate the philosophy of science and technology into topical socio-political discussions. The author reveals the concept of the scientific-technical revolution as describing the radical transformations taking place since the beginning of the 20th century in science, society, and technology. These transformations manifest the essential social and technological character of science and its previously hidden contradiction. The social character of science involves an increasing number of participants of these transformations, but the technological character leaves them passive objects of the efficiency requirements. However, the scientific-technical revolution offers a lesson in overcoming this contradiction, creating conditions for the activity of various participants — scientists, nature, lay experts, and technologies themselves. The emphasis on the radical revolutionary changes that have occurred with science allows us to keep in the spotlight the foundations of modern problems and how to solve them.

Translated title of the contributionScientific-technical revolution — important lessons of unimportant concept
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)313-325
Number of pages13
JournalVestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Jun 2020

    Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Philosophy
  • Religious studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

    Research areas

  • academic capitalism, communication, innovation, post-normal science, scientific community, uncertainty

ID: 72124126