TY - JOUR

T1 - Как сегодня изучать историю восточной европы? дискуссия

AU - Алимов, Денис Евгеньевич

AU - Филюшкин, Александр Ильич

AU - Даниш, Мирослав

AU - Дмитриев, Михаил Владимирович

AU - Ивонина, Людмила Ивановна

AU - Кузьмин, Андрей Валентинович

AU - Мартынюк, Алексей Викторович

AU - Попович, Михайло

AU - Селарт, Анти

AU - Хакманн, Йорг

AU - Чурзин, Вячеслав Васильевич

N1 - Как сегодня изучать историю Восточной Европы? Дискуссия // Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2020. № 1 (27). С. 39-65.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The discussion, devoted to the consideration of the papers of Alexander Filyushkin and Alexey Martyniuk, took part at the special section of the Petersburg Historical Forum. The participants are from Russia, Austria, Slovakia, Estonia, Germany etc. Participants in the discussion highlighted the problematic points in the study of the history of the Eastern European region: the difficulty of defining the geographical and chronological framework, the problems of an established terminology, the break in the historiographic tradition, the need to search for new methodological tools and, at the same time, to verify the correctness of its application. Arguments were expressed both “for” and “against” the proposed thesis of Alexey Martyniuk about the “Byzantinization” of the history of Old Rus'. Most of the speakers spoke in favor of overcoming the situation of “national fragmentation” of the medieval history of Eastern Europe. The development of that research perspective that would allow us to see the history of this region as the history of a single space, which has its own dynamics, its own “rhythms” and its own characteristics, which are not reducible only to the common history of modern states and nations. The importance of comparative studies was emphasized - the need, when considering the history of Old Rus' and the Eastern Slavs in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, to refer to the experience of studying the history of the southern and western Slavs, Byzantium and the medieval Balkans, the regions of the Baltic and Black Seas and, in the end, not to be afraid the search for typological parallels in “distant lands and eras” - in the history of Antiquity, the medieval Latin world, classical Western European Modernity. The discussion showed the importance of historians' reflection on the subject and method of their research, as well as the need for constant professional dialogue between representatives of different national schools and historiographic traditions.

AB - The discussion, devoted to the consideration of the papers of Alexander Filyushkin and Alexey Martyniuk, took part at the special section of the Petersburg Historical Forum. The participants are from Russia, Austria, Slovakia, Estonia, Germany etc. Participants in the discussion highlighted the problematic points in the study of the history of the Eastern European region: the difficulty of defining the geographical and chronological framework, the problems of an established terminology, the break in the historiographic tradition, the need to search for new methodological tools and, at the same time, to verify the correctness of its application. Arguments were expressed both “for” and “against” the proposed thesis of Alexey Martyniuk about the “Byzantinization” of the history of Old Rus'. Most of the speakers spoke in favor of overcoming the situation of “national fragmentation” of the medieval history of Eastern Europe. The development of that research perspective that would allow us to see the history of this region as the history of a single space, which has its own dynamics, its own “rhythms” and its own characteristics, which are not reducible only to the common history of modern states and nations. The importance of comparative studies was emphasized - the need, when considering the history of Old Rus' and the Eastern Slavs in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, to refer to the experience of studying the history of the southern and western Slavs, Byzantium and the medieval Balkans, the regions of the Baltic and Black Seas and, in the end, not to be afraid the search for typological parallels in “distant lands and eras” - in the history of Antiquity, the medieval Latin world, classical Western European Modernity. The discussion showed the importance of historians' reflection on the subject and method of their research, as well as the need for constant professional dialogue between representatives of different national schools and historiographic traditions.

KW - Byzantium

KW - Civilizational approach

KW - Eastern European Middle Ages

KW - Global history

KW - Historical memory

KW - Historiography

KW - Medieval studies

KW - Methodology

KW - Old Russia

KW - Regional studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092159649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21638/spbu19.2020.103

DO - 10.21638/spbu19.2020.103

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85092159649

VL - 27

SP - 39

EP - 65

JO - Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana

JF - Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana

SN - 1995-848X

IS - 1

ER -