TY - JOUR

T1 - Конференции по политическому моделированию: симуляция переговоров ЕС-ЕАЭС

AU - Гудалов, Николай Николаевич

AU - Трещенков, Евгений Юрьевич

AU - Леви, Дмитрий Андреевич

AU - Немчинова, Тамара Сергеевна

AU - Лагутина, Мария Львовна

N1 - Гудалов Н. Н., Трещенков Е. Ю., Леви Д. А., Немчинова Т. C., Лагутина М. Л.Конференции по политическому моделированию: симуляция переговоров ЕС — ЕАЭС // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Международные отношения. 2019. Т. 12. Вып. 4. С. 518–530. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2019.408

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - The article deals with the experience of modeling (simulating) trade negotiations between the European Union (EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), conducted with the support of the J. Monnet project at the St. Petersburg University (SPbU). The authors ana-lyze views on the strengths and limitations of modeling, which exist in academic literature. SPbU’s experience of modeling the United Nations and the European Union is examined in the article. One of the distinguishing features of the EU-EAEU simulation was its high degree of complexity in thematic and institutional respects. The task of this model was to draw up a deep free trade agreement including not only trade in goods, but also related issues concern-ing services and capital movement. The organizers’ approach to elaborating the model’s rules is explained in detail and the preparation of specific game materials is recounted. A detailed rulebook contained featured recommendations on participant preparation and rules of behav-ior, and described procedural questions, the role of the simulated institutions and their inter-action during each of the game’s days, in accordance with the program. Also, a description of the simulation’s task, the game’s program and a list of literature useful for the participants were prepared; and trainings before the game were conducted. Furthermore, the article analyses the simulation’s course with regard to the entry list, logistics, problems that emerged during the negotiations, and participant successes and failures. The authors thought it fruitful to end the article not with a traditional conclusion, but with detailed methodological guidelines on or-ganizing and conducting models, based on the organizers’ experience of this game and taking into account practices existing in the world.

AB - The article deals with the experience of modeling (simulating) trade negotiations between the European Union (EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), conducted with the support of the J. Monnet project at the St. Petersburg University (SPbU). The authors ana-lyze views on the strengths and limitations of modeling, which exist in academic literature. SPbU’s experience of modeling the United Nations and the European Union is examined in the article. One of the distinguishing features of the EU-EAEU simulation was its high degree of complexity in thematic and institutional respects. The task of this model was to draw up a deep free trade agreement including not only trade in goods, but also related issues concern-ing services and capital movement. The organizers’ approach to elaborating the model’s rules is explained in detail and the preparation of specific game materials is recounted. A detailed rulebook contained featured recommendations on participant preparation and rules of behav-ior, and described procedural questions, the role of the simulated institutions and their inter-action during each of the game’s days, in accordance with the program. Also, a description of the simulation’s task, the game’s program and a list of literature useful for the participants were prepared; and trainings before the game were conducted. Furthermore, the article analyses the simulation’s course with regard to the entry list, logistics, problems that emerged during the negotiations, and participant successes and failures. The authors thought it fruitful to end the article not with a traditional conclusion, but with detailed methodological guidelines on or-ganizing and conducting models, based on the organizers’ experience of this game and taking into account practices existing in the world.

KW - педагогика

KW - деловая игра (симуляция)

KW - политическое игровое моделирование

KW - переговорные навыки

KW - модель ЕС — ЕАЭС

KW - pedagogy

KW - simulation game

KW - POLITICAL SIMULATION MODELING

KW - NEGOTIATION SKILLS

KW - EU - EAEU MODEL

UR - https://irjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/7918/5810

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42542971

M3 - статья

VL - 12

SP - 518

EP - 530

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ

SN - 2411-121X

IS - 4

ER -