Standard

Конфликтология современного терроризма в контексте риск-рефлексивного подхода*. / Sunami, Artem N.; Крюкова, Ксения Вячеславовна.

In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, Vol. 36, No. 1, 03.2020, p. 116-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{56c6d576ad6d486eb81fd192051c9cad,
title = "Конфликтология современного терроризма в контексте риск-рефлексивного подхода*",
abstract = "The article examines the conflict nature of modern terrorism. It is proposed to consider this phenomenon through the prism of a risk-reflective approach. The article demonstrates that modern terrorism is losing its previous ontological features, attachment to a geographical, cultural or political location, and the goals that it manifests acquire an existential character. The current academic discussion around modern terrorism is analyzed and its basic interpretation is given as a means of conflictive action in a political struggle that is characterized by the use of open violence against the civilian population under a certain degree of protection of the opponent and, consequently, the formation of stable social phobias that influence political decision-making. Using original research interpretations of modern terrorism, such as “superterrorism” (E. A. Stepanova), “terrorist situation” (J. Baudrillard), “global war” (M. Hardt, A. Negri), and classic conflict theories expounded by L. Coser, R. Dahrendorf, K. Boulding, L. Kriesberg, the authors conclude that the changed parameters of terrorism lead as well to the transformation of conflict where it is used in a permanent conflict situation. This does not fundamentally imply the quasi-group{\textquoteright}s transition into real conflict groups, or into an unrealistic conflict, where terror and the fear generated by it from an instrument of political struggle turns into an end in itself. As it is shown in the article, the ability of social groups to correlate a response to threats with realistic terrorism parameters is significantly reduced. The article raises the issue of the high danger of terrorism risk-reflection transition into the format of social phobia that is spontaneously activated and subsided as a result of the manipulative effect of discursive strategies used by elite groups on it. It is confirmed that the sum of costs generated by the new format of terrorism is becoming a serious factor for modern practices of maintaining the social order in conditions of global competition.",
keywords = "Conflict management, Discourse strategy, Risk, Risk-reflection, Terrorism, conflict management, discourse strategy, risk, risk-reflection, terrorism",
author = "Sunami, {Artem N.} and Крюкова, {Ксения Вячеславовна}",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
doi = "10.21638/SPBU17.2020.110",
language = "русский",
volume = "36",
pages = "116--130",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Конфликтология современного терроризма в контексте риск-рефлексивного подхода*

AU - Sunami, Artem N.

AU - Крюкова, Ксения Вячеславовна

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - The article examines the conflict nature of modern terrorism. It is proposed to consider this phenomenon through the prism of a risk-reflective approach. The article demonstrates that modern terrorism is losing its previous ontological features, attachment to a geographical, cultural or political location, and the goals that it manifests acquire an existential character. The current academic discussion around modern terrorism is analyzed and its basic interpretation is given as a means of conflictive action in a political struggle that is characterized by the use of open violence against the civilian population under a certain degree of protection of the opponent and, consequently, the formation of stable social phobias that influence political decision-making. Using original research interpretations of modern terrorism, such as “superterrorism” (E. A. Stepanova), “terrorist situation” (J. Baudrillard), “global war” (M. Hardt, A. Negri), and classic conflict theories expounded by L. Coser, R. Dahrendorf, K. Boulding, L. Kriesberg, the authors conclude that the changed parameters of terrorism lead as well to the transformation of conflict where it is used in a permanent conflict situation. This does not fundamentally imply the quasi-group’s transition into real conflict groups, or into an unrealistic conflict, where terror and the fear generated by it from an instrument of political struggle turns into an end in itself. As it is shown in the article, the ability of social groups to correlate a response to threats with realistic terrorism parameters is significantly reduced. The article raises the issue of the high danger of terrorism risk-reflection transition into the format of social phobia that is spontaneously activated and subsided as a result of the manipulative effect of discursive strategies used by elite groups on it. It is confirmed that the sum of costs generated by the new format of terrorism is becoming a serious factor for modern practices of maintaining the social order in conditions of global competition.

AB - The article examines the conflict nature of modern terrorism. It is proposed to consider this phenomenon through the prism of a risk-reflective approach. The article demonstrates that modern terrorism is losing its previous ontological features, attachment to a geographical, cultural or political location, and the goals that it manifests acquire an existential character. The current academic discussion around modern terrorism is analyzed and its basic interpretation is given as a means of conflictive action in a political struggle that is characterized by the use of open violence against the civilian population under a certain degree of protection of the opponent and, consequently, the formation of stable social phobias that influence political decision-making. Using original research interpretations of modern terrorism, such as “superterrorism” (E. A. Stepanova), “terrorist situation” (J. Baudrillard), “global war” (M. Hardt, A. Negri), and classic conflict theories expounded by L. Coser, R. Dahrendorf, K. Boulding, L. Kriesberg, the authors conclude that the changed parameters of terrorism lead as well to the transformation of conflict where it is used in a permanent conflict situation. This does not fundamentally imply the quasi-group’s transition into real conflict groups, or into an unrealistic conflict, where terror and the fear generated by it from an instrument of political struggle turns into an end in itself. As it is shown in the article, the ability of social groups to correlate a response to threats with realistic terrorism parameters is significantly reduced. The article raises the issue of the high danger of terrorism risk-reflection transition into the format of social phobia that is spontaneously activated and subsided as a result of the manipulative effect of discursive strategies used by elite groups on it. It is confirmed that the sum of costs generated by the new format of terrorism is becoming a serious factor for modern practices of maintaining the social order in conditions of global competition.

KW - Conflict management

KW - Discourse strategy

KW - Risk

KW - Risk-reflection

KW - Terrorism

KW - conflict management

KW - discourse strategy

KW - risk

KW - risk-reflection

KW - terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091455553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/81cd04d0-b590-3859-be55-b38b74f5050f/

U2 - 10.21638/SPBU17.2020.110

DO - 10.21638/SPBU17.2020.110

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85091455553

VL - 36

SP - 116

EP - 130

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 62940135