Standard

Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины. / Пантелеев, Алексей Дмитриевич.

In: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2025, p. 164-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Harvard

Пантелеев, АД 2025, 'Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины', Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 164-175. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp2306901529081

APA

Пантелеев, А. Д. (2025). Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины. Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, 29(2), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp2306901529081

Vancouver

Пантелеев АД. Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины. Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2025;29(2):164-175. https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp2306901529081

Author

Пантелеев, Алексей Дмитриевич. / Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины. In: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2025 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 164-175.

BibTeX

@article{46aa234b6e7a4b55b5c97b5288535598,
title = "Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины",
abstract = "This article studies the terms which were used to describe apostasy and apostates in early Christian literature (1st - late 2nd century). These terms may indicate the authors' attitude towards apostates, how they differentiated between cases of apostasy, and how unforgivable this sin was considered to be. Our analysis covers the New Testament, the “Shepherd of Hermas”, the writings of Justin Martyr, and three hagiographic works: the “Martyrdom of Polycarp”, the “Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienna”, and the “Martyrdom of Pionius”. An analysis of these texts reveals that many authors drew a distinction between apostasy involving sacrifice to pagan gods or the emperor, and apostasy involving blasphemy and betrayal of Christians. While the former was considered a grave but venial sin, the latter was deemed completely unjustifiable. Similarly, consideration was given to whether the act was carried out voluntarily or under duress. Finally, the very possibility of forgiving apostates was an important issue. These differences prompted church authors to use various designations borrowed from the New Testament tradition to describe different categories of fallen ones, and to avoid the word 'apostasia', which denotes unforgivable apostasy.",
keywords = "Judaism, New Testament, apostates, early Christianity, hagiography",
author = "Пантелеев, {Алексей Дмитриевич}",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.30842/ielcp2306901529081",
language = "русский",
volume = "29",
pages = "164--175",
journal = "Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология",
issn = "2306-9015",
publisher = "Институт лингвистических исследований РАН",
number = "2",
note = "Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология : Чтения памяти И. М. Тронского ; Conference date: 16-06-2025 Through 18-06-2025",
url = "https://iling.spb.ru/conferences/2025/4414",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Отступничество в раннем христианстве: явление и термины

AU - Пантелеев, Алексей Дмитриевич

N1 - Conference code: XXIX

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This article studies the terms which were used to describe apostasy and apostates in early Christian literature (1st - late 2nd century). These terms may indicate the authors' attitude towards apostates, how they differentiated between cases of apostasy, and how unforgivable this sin was considered to be. Our analysis covers the New Testament, the “Shepherd of Hermas”, the writings of Justin Martyr, and three hagiographic works: the “Martyrdom of Polycarp”, the “Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienna”, and the “Martyrdom of Pionius”. An analysis of these texts reveals that many authors drew a distinction between apostasy involving sacrifice to pagan gods or the emperor, and apostasy involving blasphemy and betrayal of Christians. While the former was considered a grave but venial sin, the latter was deemed completely unjustifiable. Similarly, consideration was given to whether the act was carried out voluntarily or under duress. Finally, the very possibility of forgiving apostates was an important issue. These differences prompted church authors to use various designations borrowed from the New Testament tradition to describe different categories of fallen ones, and to avoid the word 'apostasia', which denotes unforgivable apostasy.

AB - This article studies the terms which were used to describe apostasy and apostates in early Christian literature (1st - late 2nd century). These terms may indicate the authors' attitude towards apostates, how they differentiated between cases of apostasy, and how unforgivable this sin was considered to be. Our analysis covers the New Testament, the “Shepherd of Hermas”, the writings of Justin Martyr, and three hagiographic works: the “Martyrdom of Polycarp”, the “Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienna”, and the “Martyrdom of Pionius”. An analysis of these texts reveals that many authors drew a distinction between apostasy involving sacrifice to pagan gods or the emperor, and apostasy involving blasphemy and betrayal of Christians. While the former was considered a grave but venial sin, the latter was deemed completely unjustifiable. Similarly, consideration was given to whether the act was carried out voluntarily or under duress. Finally, the very possibility of forgiving apostates was an important issue. These differences prompted church authors to use various designations borrowed from the New Testament tradition to describe different categories of fallen ones, and to avoid the word 'apostasia', which denotes unforgivable apostasy.

KW - Judaism

KW - New Testament

KW - apostates

KW - early Christianity

KW - hagiography

UR - https://iling.spb.ru/conferences/2025/4414

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7bc6c45c-4b20-3aff-8410-c8bf75a88e40/

U2 - 10.30842/ielcp2306901529081

DO - 10.30842/ielcp2306901529081

M3 - статья в журнале по материалам конференции

VL - 29

SP - 164

EP - 175

JO - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

JF - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

SN - 2306-9015

IS - 2

T2 - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

Y2 - 16 June 2025 through 18 June 2025

ER -

ID: 137113544