Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{2b650aadc0b1473c8c54c386b9381b06,
title = "Обратная связь в обучении глазами российских подростков",
abstract = "Despite the obvious significance of the feedback phenomenon for school practice, there is a lack of valid analysis of students{\textquoteright} perception of feedback. This article explores how Russian adolescents conceptualize and perceive feedback as an educational tool. Descriptive research was conducted using an anonymous survey based on a questionnaire composed of open-ended questions. Seven hundred and three adolescents from large cities of Russia were asked questions about how they understood “feedback”, what kind of feedback they would like to receive, and what kind of feedback they actually received from teachers. This was followed by a field study that involved an overt observation and analysis of feedback manifestations in a secondary school program for gifted students (n = 140). Most senior students understand the range of problems associated with feedback, yet they perceive feedback itself as a resource to be used by the teacher, not by themselves. In their beliefs about feedback, adolescents intuitively rely on either “behavioral” or “existential” perspective. In the former case, feedback is perceived only as an external stimulus and the resulting response. In the latter, students regard feedback as a tool for dialogue, support, engaged communication, relationship development, and direct or indirect request for evaluation or assistance. The more complex interpretation may stem from students{\textquoteright} prior participation in situations of assistance and cooperation as well as their perceived need for a dialogue with the teacher or tutor. Since the sample was unrepresentative, the conclusions made in this study should be deemed preliminary. Nevertheless, they allow designing further research of feedback literacy in Russia{\textquoteright}s school education.",
keywords = "adolescents, communicative competence, feedback at school, feedback literacy, field research, questionnaire interview, school education, CLASSROOM, VOICE, SCIENCE",
author = "Азбель, {Анастасия Анатольевна} and Илюшин, {Леонид Сергеевич} and Морозова, {Полина Анатольевна}",
note = "Азбель А. А., Илюшин Л. С., Морозова П. А. (2021) Обратная связь в обучении глазами российских подростков // Вопросы образования / Educational Studies Moscow. № 1. С. 195–212. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-195-212",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-195-212",
language = "русский",
volume = "2021",
pages = "195--212",
journal = "Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow",
issn = "1814-9545",
publisher = "Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Обратная связь в обучении глазами российских подростков

AU - Азбель, Анастасия Анатольевна

AU - Илюшин, Леонид Сергеевич

AU - Морозова, Полина Анатольевна

N1 - Азбель А. А., Илюшин Л. С., Морозова П. А. (2021) Обратная связь в обучении глазами российских подростков // Вопросы образования / Educational Studies Moscow. № 1. С. 195–212. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-195-212

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Despite the obvious significance of the feedback phenomenon for school practice, there is a lack of valid analysis of students’ perception of feedback. This article explores how Russian adolescents conceptualize and perceive feedback as an educational tool. Descriptive research was conducted using an anonymous survey based on a questionnaire composed of open-ended questions. Seven hundred and three adolescents from large cities of Russia were asked questions about how they understood “feedback”, what kind of feedback they would like to receive, and what kind of feedback they actually received from teachers. This was followed by a field study that involved an overt observation and analysis of feedback manifestations in a secondary school program for gifted students (n = 140). Most senior students understand the range of problems associated with feedback, yet they perceive feedback itself as a resource to be used by the teacher, not by themselves. In their beliefs about feedback, adolescents intuitively rely on either “behavioral” or “existential” perspective. In the former case, feedback is perceived only as an external stimulus and the resulting response. In the latter, students regard feedback as a tool for dialogue, support, engaged communication, relationship development, and direct or indirect request for evaluation or assistance. The more complex interpretation may stem from students’ prior participation in situations of assistance and cooperation as well as their perceived need for a dialogue with the teacher or tutor. Since the sample was unrepresentative, the conclusions made in this study should be deemed preliminary. Nevertheless, they allow designing further research of feedback literacy in Russia’s school education.

AB - Despite the obvious significance of the feedback phenomenon for school practice, there is a lack of valid analysis of students’ perception of feedback. This article explores how Russian adolescents conceptualize and perceive feedback as an educational tool. Descriptive research was conducted using an anonymous survey based on a questionnaire composed of open-ended questions. Seven hundred and three adolescents from large cities of Russia were asked questions about how they understood “feedback”, what kind of feedback they would like to receive, and what kind of feedback they actually received from teachers. This was followed by a field study that involved an overt observation and analysis of feedback manifestations in a secondary school program for gifted students (n = 140). Most senior students understand the range of problems associated with feedback, yet they perceive feedback itself as a resource to be used by the teacher, not by themselves. In their beliefs about feedback, adolescents intuitively rely on either “behavioral” or “existential” perspective. In the former case, feedback is perceived only as an external stimulus and the resulting response. In the latter, students regard feedback as a tool for dialogue, support, engaged communication, relationship development, and direct or indirect request for evaluation or assistance. The more complex interpretation may stem from students’ prior participation in situations of assistance and cooperation as well as their perceived need for a dialogue with the teacher or tutor. Since the sample was unrepresentative, the conclusions made in this study should be deemed preliminary. Nevertheless, they allow designing further research of feedback literacy in Russia’s school education.

KW - adolescents

KW - communicative competence

KW - feedback at school

KW - feedback literacy

KW - field research

KW - questionnaire interview

KW - school education

KW - CLASSROOM

KW - VOICE

KW - SCIENCE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103709708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/48b38fba-056a-3bf7-9ece-7e0cc2a0531c/

U2 - 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-195-212

DO - 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-195-212

M3 - статья

VL - 2021

SP - 195

EP - 212

JO - Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow

JF - Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow

SN - 1814-9545

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 75134277