Standard

НАМЕРЕНИЕ И НАМЕРЕННОЕ ДЕЙСТВИЕ В ФИЛОСОФИИ ПРАВА : ПРИ ЧЕМ ЗДЕСЬ ВИТГЕНШТЕЙН? / Ogleznev, Vitaly V.

In: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2022, p. 38-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{16ddba8b36e14e6bb8f973d7be42f950,
title = "НАМЕРЕНИЕ И НАМЕРЕННОЕ ДЕЙСТВИЕ В ФИЛОСОФИИ ПРАВА: ПРИ ЧЕМ ЗДЕСЬ ВИТГЕНШТЕЙН?",
abstract = "The article examines K.A. Rodin{\textquoteright}s thesis on the possibility of including Wittgenstein{\textquoteright}s remarks on intention and action in the context of legal philosophy research. It is shown that although the concepts of intention and intentional action are relevant to the philosophy of law, Wittgenstein{\textquoteright}s own ideas did not have a significant impact on their relevance (and some of them did not have it at all). This influence is confined to the fact that, like Wittgenstein, many jurists and legal theorists, mainly those who were influenced by the ideas of H.L.A. Hart, also objected to the causal theory of action. However, the influence is limited to this approach.",
keywords = "intention, philosophy of law, theory of action, will, Wittgenstein",
author = "Ogleznev, {Vitaly V.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 RAS Institute of Philosophy. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.5840/eps20225914",
language = "русский",
volume = "59",
pages = "38--44",
journal = "ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ",
issn = "1811-833X",
publisher = "Институт философии РАН",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - НАМЕРЕНИЕ И НАМЕРЕННОЕ ДЕЙСТВИЕ В ФИЛОСОФИИ ПРАВА

T2 - ПРИ ЧЕМ ЗДЕСЬ ВИТГЕНШТЕЙН?

AU - Ogleznev, Vitaly V.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 RAS Institute of Philosophy. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The article examines K.A. Rodin’s thesis on the possibility of including Wittgenstein’s remarks on intention and action in the context of legal philosophy research. It is shown that although the concepts of intention and intentional action are relevant to the philosophy of law, Wittgenstein’s own ideas did not have a significant impact on their relevance (and some of them did not have it at all). This influence is confined to the fact that, like Wittgenstein, many jurists and legal theorists, mainly those who were influenced by the ideas of H.L.A. Hart, also objected to the causal theory of action. However, the influence is limited to this approach.

AB - The article examines K.A. Rodin’s thesis on the possibility of including Wittgenstein’s remarks on intention and action in the context of legal philosophy research. It is shown that although the concepts of intention and intentional action are relevant to the philosophy of law, Wittgenstein’s own ideas did not have a significant impact on their relevance (and some of them did not have it at all). This influence is confined to the fact that, like Wittgenstein, many jurists and legal theorists, mainly those who were influenced by the ideas of H.L.A. Hart, also objected to the causal theory of action. However, the influence is limited to this approach.

KW - intention

KW - philosophy of law

KW - theory of action

KW - will

KW - Wittgenstein

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128155906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5a89b8e2-0a26-38bb-8983-f72a2c85c336/

U2 - 10.5840/eps20225914

DO - 10.5840/eps20225914

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85128155906

VL - 59

SP - 38

EP - 44

JO - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

JF - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

SN - 1811-833X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 94855983