Standard

Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность? / Вальтер, Харри; Мокиенко, Валерий Михайлович.

XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи : у два тома. Vol. 1 Белград, 2018. p. 89-90.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Harvard

Вальтер, Х & Мокиенко, ВМ 2018, Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность? in XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи : у два тома. vol. 1, Белград, pp. 89-90, XVI Международный конгресс славистов, Белград, Serbia, 20/08/18.

APA

Вальтер, Х., & Мокиенко, В. М. (2018). Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность? In XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи : у два тома (Vol. 1, pp. 89-90).

Vancouver

Вальтер Х, Мокиенко ВМ. Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность? In XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи : у два тома. Vol. 1. Белград. 2018. p. 89-90

Author

Вальтер, Харри ; Мокиенко, Валерий Михайлович. / Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность?. XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи : у два тома. Vol. 1 Белград, 2018. pp. 89-90

BibTeX

@inproceedings{a1b4a61de56642149e5b5244196742d9,
title = "Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность?",
abstract = "The reconstruction of the Proto-Slavic vocabulary was and remains one of the priority tasks of comparative-historical Slavic studies. Different approaches to the solution of this problem are demonstrated by the monumental (although not completed) etymological dictionaries of the Proto-Slavic language, the hypothetical existence of which is recognized by most Slavists and Indo-Europeanists. Its reconstruction is performed almost exclusively on lexical material, and attempts to reconstruct the pre-Slavic phraseology are single. The method of such a reconstruction, based on a detailed account of the dialect material, was proposed in 1973 by N. I. Tolstoy. Studies in this direction make it possible to identify a zone of relative generality of Slavic phraseology, which, however, comes into contact with the Baltic and German-speaking zones. Inside such a Slavic massif, sub-zones of East Slavic-Polish phraseological interaction (often associated with the Baltic), West Slavic-Croatian-Slovenian (strongly influenced by German phraseology) and BulgarianMacedonian-Serbian (revealing traces of Turkic language influence) are revealed. In this general areal picture, there are many more concrete interactions, for example, a particular language specifics of the phraseology.",
author = "Харри Вальтер and Мокиенко, {Валерий Михайлович}",
year = "2018",
language = "русский",
isbn = "9788691794958",
volume = "1",
pages = "89--90",
booktitle = "XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи",
note = "null ; Conference date: 20-08-2018 Through 27-08-2018",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Праславянская фразеология – миф или реальность?

AU - Вальтер, Харри

AU - Мокиенко, Валерий Михайлович

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The reconstruction of the Proto-Slavic vocabulary was and remains one of the priority tasks of comparative-historical Slavic studies. Different approaches to the solution of this problem are demonstrated by the monumental (although not completed) etymological dictionaries of the Proto-Slavic language, the hypothetical existence of which is recognized by most Slavists and Indo-Europeanists. Its reconstruction is performed almost exclusively on lexical material, and attempts to reconstruct the pre-Slavic phraseology are single. The method of such a reconstruction, based on a detailed account of the dialect material, was proposed in 1973 by N. I. Tolstoy. Studies in this direction make it possible to identify a zone of relative generality of Slavic phraseology, which, however, comes into contact with the Baltic and German-speaking zones. Inside such a Slavic massif, sub-zones of East Slavic-Polish phraseological interaction (often associated with the Baltic), West Slavic-Croatian-Slovenian (strongly influenced by German phraseology) and BulgarianMacedonian-Serbian (revealing traces of Turkic language influence) are revealed. In this general areal picture, there are many more concrete interactions, for example, a particular language specifics of the phraseology.

AB - The reconstruction of the Proto-Slavic vocabulary was and remains one of the priority tasks of comparative-historical Slavic studies. Different approaches to the solution of this problem are demonstrated by the monumental (although not completed) etymological dictionaries of the Proto-Slavic language, the hypothetical existence of which is recognized by most Slavists and Indo-Europeanists. Its reconstruction is performed almost exclusively on lexical material, and attempts to reconstruct the pre-Slavic phraseology are single. The method of such a reconstruction, based on a detailed account of the dialect material, was proposed in 1973 by N. I. Tolstoy. Studies in this direction make it possible to identify a zone of relative generality of Slavic phraseology, which, however, comes into contact with the Baltic and German-speaking zones. Inside such a Slavic massif, sub-zones of East Slavic-Polish phraseological interaction (often associated with the Baltic), West Slavic-Croatian-Slovenian (strongly influenced by German phraseology) and BulgarianMacedonian-Serbian (revealing traces of Turkic language influence) are revealed. In this general areal picture, there are many more concrete interactions, for example, a particular language specifics of the phraseology.

UR - http://mks2018.fil.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Knjiga-Rezimea-1-jezicki-MKS.pdf

M3 - статья в сборнике материалов конференции

SN - 9788691794958

VL - 1

SP - 89

EP - 90

BT - XVI међународни конгрес слависта. Тезе и резимеи

CY - Белград

Y2 - 20 August 2018 through 27 August 2018

ER -

ID: 33895853