Standard

Механизмы блокады ионных каналов глутаматных рецепторов : парадокс 9-аминоакридина. / Kim, K. H.; Gmiro, V. E.; Tikhonov, D. B.; Magazanik, L. G.

In: Biologicheskie Membrany, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2007, p. 97-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{7cc2acf36ee548369a38d19278013035,
title = "Механизмы блокады ионных каналов глутаматных рецепторов: парадокс 9-аминоакридина",
abstract = "9-Aminoacridine and tacrine differ from other potent channel blockers of NMDA receptors because their binding prevents channel closing and agonist dissociation. The specific properties that determine this mechanism of action remain unknown. In the present work, we studied the action of dicationic analogs of 9-aminoacridine and other tricyclic compounds on the native NMDA receptor in hippocampal pyramidal neurons of rat brain. All the drugs induced a voltage-dependent block of NMDA receptor channels. At -80 mV, they demonstrated IC50 values from 1 to 50 μM. Dicationic compounds had the same voltage dependence as the monocationic ones. Both mono- and dicationic threecyclic compounds are weak blockers of AMPA receptor channels. Thus, they differ significantly from the derivatives of adamantane, di- and triphenyl, for which it has been demonstrated that dicationic analogs are more voltage-dependent NMDA receptor channel blockers then the monocationic analogs. Additionally, the dicationic derivatives of adamantane, di- and threephenyl are the potent antagonists of AMPA receptor channels. The threecyclic compounds including dicationic analogs of 9-aminoacridine differ from 9-aminoacridine by the mechanism of block because they do not prevent NMDA receptor channel from closing. It is concluded that the site of action of 9-aminoacridine on the NMDA receptor channel has specific organization and is very selective for the ligand structure.",
author = "Kim, {K. H.} and Gmiro, {V. E.} and Tikhonov, {D. B.} and Magazanik, {L. G.}",
year = "2007",
language = "русский",
volume = "24",
pages = "97--104",
journal = "БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ МЕМБРАНЫ: ЖУРНАЛ МЕМБРАННОЙ И КЛЕТОЧНОЙ БИОЛОГИИ",
issn = "0233-4755",
publisher = "Российская академия наук",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Механизмы блокады ионных каналов глутаматных рецепторов

T2 - парадокс 9-аминоакридина

AU - Kim, K. H.

AU - Gmiro, V. E.

AU - Tikhonov, D. B.

AU - Magazanik, L. G.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - 9-Aminoacridine and tacrine differ from other potent channel blockers of NMDA receptors because their binding prevents channel closing and agonist dissociation. The specific properties that determine this mechanism of action remain unknown. In the present work, we studied the action of dicationic analogs of 9-aminoacridine and other tricyclic compounds on the native NMDA receptor in hippocampal pyramidal neurons of rat brain. All the drugs induced a voltage-dependent block of NMDA receptor channels. At -80 mV, they demonstrated IC50 values from 1 to 50 μM. Dicationic compounds had the same voltage dependence as the monocationic ones. Both mono- and dicationic threecyclic compounds are weak blockers of AMPA receptor channels. Thus, they differ significantly from the derivatives of adamantane, di- and triphenyl, for which it has been demonstrated that dicationic analogs are more voltage-dependent NMDA receptor channel blockers then the monocationic analogs. Additionally, the dicationic derivatives of adamantane, di- and threephenyl are the potent antagonists of AMPA receptor channels. The threecyclic compounds including dicationic analogs of 9-aminoacridine differ from 9-aminoacridine by the mechanism of block because they do not prevent NMDA receptor channel from closing. It is concluded that the site of action of 9-aminoacridine on the NMDA receptor channel has specific organization and is very selective for the ligand structure.

AB - 9-Aminoacridine and tacrine differ from other potent channel blockers of NMDA receptors because their binding prevents channel closing and agonist dissociation. The specific properties that determine this mechanism of action remain unknown. In the present work, we studied the action of dicationic analogs of 9-aminoacridine and other tricyclic compounds on the native NMDA receptor in hippocampal pyramidal neurons of rat brain. All the drugs induced a voltage-dependent block of NMDA receptor channels. At -80 mV, they demonstrated IC50 values from 1 to 50 μM. Dicationic compounds had the same voltage dependence as the monocationic ones. Both mono- and dicationic threecyclic compounds are weak blockers of AMPA receptor channels. Thus, they differ significantly from the derivatives of adamantane, di- and triphenyl, for which it has been demonstrated that dicationic analogs are more voltage-dependent NMDA receptor channel blockers then the monocationic analogs. Additionally, the dicationic derivatives of adamantane, di- and threephenyl are the potent antagonists of AMPA receptor channels. The threecyclic compounds including dicationic analogs of 9-aminoacridine differ from 9-aminoacridine by the mechanism of block because they do not prevent NMDA receptor channel from closing. It is concluded that the site of action of 9-aminoacridine on the NMDA receptor channel has specific organization and is very selective for the ligand structure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947211280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:33947211280

VL - 24

SP - 97

EP - 104

JO - БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ МЕМБРАНЫ: ЖУРНАЛ МЕМБРАННОЙ И КЛЕТОЧНОЙ БИОЛОГИИ

JF - БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ МЕМБРАНЫ: ЖУРНАЛ МЕМБРАННОЙ И КЛЕТОЧНОЙ БИОЛОГИИ

SN - 0233-4755

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 99384542