Standard

Власть как публичный процесс. / Федоров, Сергей Егорович.

In: ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ, Vol. 13, No. 1(111), 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Федоров, СЕ 2022, 'Власть как публичный процесс', ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ, vol. 13, no. 1(111). https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840019082-9, https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840019082-9

APA

Федоров, С. Е. (2022). Власть как публичный процесс. ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ, 13(1(111)). https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840019082-9, https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840019082-9

Vancouver

Федоров СЕ. Власть как публичный процесс. ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ. 2022;13(1(111)). https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840019082-9, https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840019082-9

Author

Федоров, Сергей Егорович. / Власть как публичный процесс. In: ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ. 2022 ; Vol. 13, No. 1(111).

BibTeX

@article{29cb9aa243664ea29b177b8bac4f80fb,
title = "Власть как публичный процесс",
abstract = "The article underlines applicability of relationistic and systemic approaches to a phenomenon of the power and subsequent power relations. Relationists consider power and subsequent power relations as a possibility for an individual or group to change the behavior of another individual or group. In the systemic approach power is defined as a specific impersonal quality of political system, as an internal functional, not joined by an individual or group of individuals. The article develops some points on advantages of the systemic approach for an understanding of power relations in the Medieval societies as a public process. Key elements of the conceptual scheme are realized within a context, which determined major trends in development of an idea of absolute royal power in the Western European monarchies. Suggesting that medieval concept of the royal prerogatives was influenced by theological and legal (almost canon law) discourses, the author demonstrates how they were finely unified in the 14th century intellectual controversies and in what way they became instrumental for Baldus de Ubaldis{\textquoteright}s political thought. New preferences were based on a strong distinction of an absolute and ordained power: supreme secular authorities, while functioned, perceived their unlimited prerogatives as a perspective potential but emphasized a constructiveness of applicability of their limited credentials.",
keywords = "absolute power, Early Modern, limited power, Middle Ages, relationistic approach to the power relations system{\textquoteright}s approach to the power relations, Western Europe, Early Modern, Middle Ages, Western Europe, absolute power, limited power, relationistic approach to the power relations system{\textquoteright}s approach to the power relations",
author = "Федоров, {Сергей Егорович}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.18254/s207987840019082-9",
language = "русский",
volume = "13",
journal = "ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ",
issn = "2079-8784",
publisher = "Интеграция: Образование и Наука",
number = "1(111)",
note = "Первый международный Петербургский исторический форум (Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, 29.10. – 03.11.2019 г.) ; Conference date: 29-10-2019 Through 03-11-2019",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Власть как публичный процесс

AU - Федоров, Сергей Егорович

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The article underlines applicability of relationistic and systemic approaches to a phenomenon of the power and subsequent power relations. Relationists consider power and subsequent power relations as a possibility for an individual or group to change the behavior of another individual or group. In the systemic approach power is defined as a specific impersonal quality of political system, as an internal functional, not joined by an individual or group of individuals. The article develops some points on advantages of the systemic approach for an understanding of power relations in the Medieval societies as a public process. Key elements of the conceptual scheme are realized within a context, which determined major trends in development of an idea of absolute royal power in the Western European monarchies. Suggesting that medieval concept of the royal prerogatives was influenced by theological and legal (almost canon law) discourses, the author demonstrates how they were finely unified in the 14th century intellectual controversies and in what way they became instrumental for Baldus de Ubaldis’s political thought. New preferences were based on a strong distinction of an absolute and ordained power: supreme secular authorities, while functioned, perceived their unlimited prerogatives as a perspective potential but emphasized a constructiveness of applicability of their limited credentials.

AB - The article underlines applicability of relationistic and systemic approaches to a phenomenon of the power and subsequent power relations. Relationists consider power and subsequent power relations as a possibility for an individual or group to change the behavior of another individual or group. In the systemic approach power is defined as a specific impersonal quality of political system, as an internal functional, not joined by an individual or group of individuals. The article develops some points on advantages of the systemic approach for an understanding of power relations in the Medieval societies as a public process. Key elements of the conceptual scheme are realized within a context, which determined major trends in development of an idea of absolute royal power in the Western European monarchies. Suggesting that medieval concept of the royal prerogatives was influenced by theological and legal (almost canon law) discourses, the author demonstrates how they were finely unified in the 14th century intellectual controversies and in what way they became instrumental for Baldus de Ubaldis’s political thought. New preferences were based on a strong distinction of an absolute and ordained power: supreme secular authorities, while functioned, perceived their unlimited prerogatives as a perspective potential but emphasized a constructiveness of applicability of their limited credentials.

KW - absolute power

KW - Early Modern

KW - limited power

KW - Middle Ages

KW - relationistic approach to the power relations system’s approach to the power relations

KW - Western Europe

KW - Early Modern

KW - Middle Ages

KW - Western Europe

KW - absolute power

KW - limited power

KW - relationistic approach to the power relations system’s approach to the power relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129667869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a25789c1-9578-3e7a-8b2a-8a1e3d98c575/

U2 - 10.18254/s207987840019082-9

DO - 10.18254/s207987840019082-9

M3 - статья

VL - 13

JO - ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ

JF - ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ

SN - 2079-8784

IS - 1(111)

T2 - Первый международный Петербургский исторический форум (Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, 29.10. – 03.11.2019 г.)

Y2 - 29 October 2019 through 3 November 2019

ER -

ID: 93824982