Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Онтология русской художественной культуры. / Цветаева, М.Н.
In: Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства, No. 6, 2016, p. 777-783.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Онтология русской художественной культуры
AU - Цветаева, М.Н.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - A profound analysis of modern culture, in the context of its foundations and connection with the previous tradition defined by Christian ontology and anthropology, is very important for the time being. It reveals soteriological, ontological, symbolical, liturgical, psychological, ethical, and anagogical aspects. Ascetic practices and patristic literature, for example works by Archimandrite Sophronius (Sakharov), the biographer of Silouan the Athonite, state that the basis and the meaning of culture is to witness the Truth, Beauty and Good. Modern culture cannot discard heavenly, iconic, logocentric, and sofinety approaches as a basis for the creation of an artistic image. We are talking about inversions, shifting of meaning and value of the language. It is important to analyze so called “artistic forfeit” and its influence upon our cognitive abilities. We have suffered great losses: a sense of harmony, divine beauty, ability for metaphoric thinking. For example, due to the lack of spiritual and psychological content, contemporary icon-painting is in a crisis. It seems crucial to learn more about interactions between Old Russian, classical and avant-garde phases of art. Interpretations of artistic texts, “seeing” a profound meaning, the sense of the divine eternity are also actual problems of the modern culture. It is important to discuss the meaning of an artist’s responsibility, freedom of creation, spiritualism, spiritual supervision, the meaning of words and prospects of an artwork.
AB - A profound analysis of modern culture, in the context of its foundations and connection with the previous tradition defined by Christian ontology and anthropology, is very important for the time being. It reveals soteriological, ontological, symbolical, liturgical, psychological, ethical, and anagogical aspects. Ascetic practices and patristic literature, for example works by Archimandrite Sophronius (Sakharov), the biographer of Silouan the Athonite, state that the basis and the meaning of culture is to witness the Truth, Beauty and Good. Modern culture cannot discard heavenly, iconic, logocentric, and sofinety approaches as a basis for the creation of an artistic image. We are talking about inversions, shifting of meaning and value of the language. It is important to analyze so called “artistic forfeit” and its influence upon our cognitive abilities. We have suffered great losses: a sense of harmony, divine beauty, ability for metaphoric thinking. For example, due to the lack of spiritual and psychological content, contemporary icon-painting is in a crisis. It seems crucial to learn more about interactions between Old Russian, classical and avant-garde phases of art. Interpretations of artistic texts, “seeing” a profound meaning, the sense of the divine eternity are also actual problems of the modern culture. It is important to discuss the meaning of an artist’s responsibility, freedom of creation, spiritualism, spiritual supervision, the meaning of words and prospects of an artwork.
KW - Anti-icon
KW - Apostasy
KW - Archimandrite Sophronius (Sakharov)
KW - Body integrity
KW - Disembodiment
KW - Iconicity
KW - Ontology
KW - Prototype
KW - Soteriology
KW - Spirit
KW - The knowledge of God
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030120494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18688/aa166-11-85
DO - 10.18688/aa166-11-85
M3 - статья
SP - 777
EP - 783
JO - Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства
JF - Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства
SN - 2312-2129
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 49973749