Авторы, рецензенты, редакторы

Standard

Авторы, рецензенты, редакторы. / Желтов, Александр Юрьевич.

In: Antropologicheskij Forum, Vol. 17, No. 50, 2021, p. 11-100.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{d299e95c64d14c238a745b5872437739,

title = "Авторы, рецензенты, редакторы",

abstract = "The 50th issue of the journal marks a jubilee. We have decided to mark this exceptional event in the journal{\textquoteright}s history by organising a {\textquoteleft}forum{\textquoteright} on an exceptional subject: the relations between two different camps in the academic world: authors and editors. Sometimes these relations are harmonious and friendly, at other times less so; at other times again, they can be plain tense, or even openly hostile. The situation is further complicated by the activities of peer reviewers (a relatively novel phenomenon in the Russian speaking world, more familiar in the USA and UK, and in parts of Western Europe). Participants were invited to share their experience of working with editors / editorial boards / authors and to describe the ideal editor (or conversely, the ideal author), and the ideal peer reviewer — as well as the anti-heroes. They were at liberty to use pseudonyms or their real names.",

author = "Желтов, {Александр Юрьевич}",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-50-11-100",

language = "русский",

volume = "17",

pages = "11--100",

journal = "Antropologicheskij Forum",

issn = "1815-8870",

publisher = "Музей антропологии и этнографии им. Петра Великого РАН (Кунсткамера) ",

number = "50",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Авторы, рецензенты, редакторы

AU - Желтов, Александр Юрьевич

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The 50th issue of the journal marks a jubilee. We have decided to mark this exceptional event in the journal’s history by organising a ‘forum’ on an exceptional subject: the relations between two different camps in the academic world: authors and editors. Sometimes these relations are harmonious and friendly, at other times less so; at other times again, they can be plain tense, or even openly hostile. The situation is further complicated by the activities of peer reviewers (a relatively novel phenomenon in the Russian speaking world, more familiar in the USA and UK, and in parts of Western Europe). Participants were invited to share their experience of working with editors / editorial boards / authors and to describe the ideal editor (or conversely, the ideal author), and the ideal peer reviewer — as well as the anti-heroes. They were at liberty to use pseudonyms or their real names.

AB - The 50th issue of the journal marks a jubilee. We have decided to mark this exceptional event in the journal’s history by organising a ‘forum’ on an exceptional subject: the relations between two different camps in the academic world: authors and editors. Sometimes these relations are harmonious and friendly, at other times less so; at other times again, they can be plain tense, or even openly hostile. The situation is further complicated by the activities of peer reviewers (a relatively novel phenomenon in the Russian speaking world, more familiar in the USA and UK, and in parts of Western Europe). Participants were invited to share their experience of working with editors / editorial boards / authors and to describe the ideal editor (or conversely, the ideal author), and the ideal peer reviewer — as well as the anti-heroes. They were at liberty to use pseudonyms or their real names.

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ec94d458-83fa-3a90-8d84-bd7b49f916ea/

U2 - 10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-50-11-100

DO - 10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-50-11-100

M3 - редакционная статья

VL - 17

SP - 11

EP - 100

JO - Antropologicheskij Forum

JF - Antropologicheskij Forum

SN - 1815-8870

IS - 50

ER -

ID: 87571448