To which species should the name heynei Rühl, [1893] (Lepidoptera

Nymphalidae) be referred?

Peter J.C. Russell, Vladimir A. Lukhtanov

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьянаучнаярецензирование

Выдержка

Historical records of Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758) and M. arduinna (Esper, [1783]) from the mountains of Central Asia, including named subspecies and forms, are reviewed with particular reference to the name heynei Rühl, [1893], which has been associated with both of the aforementioned species. It is concluded that the name heynei should be associated with M. arduinna and not M. cinxia. For the sake of nomenclatural stability, a specimen of M. arduinna from the southern slope of Alai Mountains (Kyrgyzstan, Daroot-Korgon) is designated as the neotype of Melitaea cinxia var. heynei Rühl, [1893]. The morphological features of M. cinxia and M. arduinna, including the subspecies of the latter, are compared and figured. The historic and recent misidentifications of M. cinxia as M. arduinna and vice versa are exemplified.

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Страницы (с-по)81-94
Число страниц14
ЖурналZootaxa
Том4531
Номер выпуска1
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 11 дек 2018

Предметные области Scopus

  • Экология, эволюция поведение и систематика
  • Зоология и животноводство

Цитировать

@article{4e7460c7b2854291adad8f3973f7b824,
title = "To which species should the name heynei R{\"u}hl, [1893] (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) be referred?",
abstract = "Historical records of Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758) and M. arduinna (Esper, [1783]) from the mountains of Central Asia, including named subspecies and forms, are reviewed with particular reference to the name heynei R{\"u}hl, [1893], which has been associated with both of the aforementioned species. It is concluded that the name heynei should be associated with M. arduinna and not M. cinxia. For the sake of nomenclatural stability, a specimen of M. arduinna from the southern slope of Alai Mountains (Kyrgyzstan, Daroot-Korgon) is designated as the neotype of Melitaea cinxia var. heynei R{\"u}hl, [1893]. The morphological features of M. cinxia and M. arduinna, including the subspecies of the latter, are compared and figured. The historic and recent misidentifications of M. cinxia as M. arduinna and vice versa are exemplified.",
keywords = "Alai, Arduinna, Central Asia, Cinxia, Heynei, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Melitaea, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan",
author = "Russell, {Peter J.C.} and Lukhtanov, {Vladimir A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.11646/zootaxa.4531.1.3",
language = "English",
volume = "4531",
pages = "81--94",
journal = "Zootaxa",
issn = "1175-5326",
publisher = "Magnolia Press",
number = "1",

}

To which species should the name heynei Rühl, [1893] (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) be referred? / Russell, Peter J.C.; Lukhtanov, Vladimir A.

В: Zootaxa, Том 4531, № 1, 11.12.2018, стр. 81-94.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьянаучнаярецензирование

TY - JOUR

T1 - To which species should the name heynei Rühl, [1893] (Lepidoptera

T2 - Nymphalidae) be referred?

AU - Russell, Peter J.C.

AU - Lukhtanov, Vladimir A.

PY - 2018/12/11

Y1 - 2018/12/11

N2 - Historical records of Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758) and M. arduinna (Esper, [1783]) from the mountains of Central Asia, including named subspecies and forms, are reviewed with particular reference to the name heynei Rühl, [1893], which has been associated with both of the aforementioned species. It is concluded that the name heynei should be associated with M. arduinna and not M. cinxia. For the sake of nomenclatural stability, a specimen of M. arduinna from the southern slope of Alai Mountains (Kyrgyzstan, Daroot-Korgon) is designated as the neotype of Melitaea cinxia var. heynei Rühl, [1893]. The morphological features of M. cinxia and M. arduinna, including the subspecies of the latter, are compared and figured. The historic and recent misidentifications of M. cinxia as M. arduinna and vice versa are exemplified.

AB - Historical records of Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758) and M. arduinna (Esper, [1783]) from the mountains of Central Asia, including named subspecies and forms, are reviewed with particular reference to the name heynei Rühl, [1893], which has been associated with both of the aforementioned species. It is concluded that the name heynei should be associated with M. arduinna and not M. cinxia. For the sake of nomenclatural stability, a specimen of M. arduinna from the southern slope of Alai Mountains (Kyrgyzstan, Daroot-Korgon) is designated as the neotype of Melitaea cinxia var. heynei Rühl, [1893]. The morphological features of M. cinxia and M. arduinna, including the subspecies of the latter, are compared and figured. The historic and recent misidentifications of M. cinxia as M. arduinna and vice versa are exemplified.

KW - Alai

KW - Arduinna

KW - Central Asia

KW - Cinxia

KW - Heynei

KW - Kazakhstan

KW - Kyrgyzstan

KW - Melitaea

KW - Tajikistan

KW - Uzbekistan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058154068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11646/zootaxa.4531.1.3

DO - 10.11646/zootaxa.4531.1.3

M3 - Article

VL - 4531

SP - 81

EP - 94

JO - Zootaxa

JF - Zootaxa

SN - 1175-5326

IS - 1

ER -