The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статьярецензирование

Аннотация

Studying cultural memory and practices of “oblivion” and “remembrance”, scholars encounter a whole range of phenomena which have remained nameless and practically undescribed in special literature so far and, therefore, are, in a manner of speaking, “illegitimate”. Moreover, to use well-established terminology inevitably means to employ traditional approaches, which due to their retrospective character aren't able to recognize new phenomena. hus, we should describe such phenomena and “bring them to light” by means of speciic terminology. he paper introduces these fundamental terms, allowing for the description of previously unapparent cultural phenomena. he list of these terms includes “cultural exclusion zones”, “current (ield) of culture”, “deactualization,” “reactualization”, and “cultural frontier (borderline) zones”.

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Страницы (с-по)165-180
Число страниц16
ЖурналRivista di Estetica
Том67
Номер выпуска1
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 1 апр 2018

Предметные области Scopus

  • Философия

Fingerprint Подробные сведения о темах исследования «The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones». Вместе они формируют уникальный семантический отпечаток (fingerprint).

Цитировать