The Ethnic Key of Polity and the State-Building Failure in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Результат исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборникенаучнаярецензирование

Аннотация

Twenty years after the signing of the GFAP, the «primary ambiguity» of this Agreement does not seem to have been overcome.
The ambiguity we are speaking about, lays mainly on the ambivalence of the Agreement’s political content. Shortly speaking, its entering into force has legitimised the existence of an independent State of Bosnia-Herzegovina, while establishing two Entities (called Republika Srpska and Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina) with a so wide autonomy to appear the key components of a loose confederation .
Since then, the reached accommodation has remained ambivalent in defining the character of the State.
The chapter, therefore, discusses the main reasons why twenty year after the peace treaty was signed the Balkan weakness is meeting the European irresolution on the implementation of its political project, stemming from the political crisis that dates from the failure of the constitutional treaty in 2005 and the persistence of the economic and financial crisis since 2008. Increasingly, the chapter suggests that the enduring hesitancy and outlet of the latter will deeply determine the evolution of the former.
Язык оригиналаанглийский
Название основной публикацииTwenty Years After Dayton. The Constitutional Transition of Bosnia-Herzegovina-Proceeding of the Conference
РедакторыLudovica Benedizione, Valentina Rita Scotti
Место публикацииRome
ИздательLUISS University Press
Страницы129-140
Число страниц11
ISBN (электронное издание)978-88-6856-083-6
СостояниеОпубликовано - 2016

Fingerprint

Подробные сведения о темах исследования «The Ethnic Key of Polity and the State-Building Failure in Bosnia-Herzegovina». Вместе они формируют уникальный семантический отпечаток (fingerprint).

Цитировать